An e-book by Anna K. - Remarks

Remarks on Anna K's e-book, The Do's and Don'ts of Online Dating

>Was I too
>trusting? Did I let others into my life too quickly? Was I naïve to believe men?
>Should I have never given out my address to anyone? Maybe I still did not
>know how to tell if someone is lying to me or not, even though I read many
>books on body language, eye movement and “signals” to tell liars apart from
>the honest folks.

None of the above. What she did was unscrupulously use and manipulate men for her own
selfish purposes and "dating experiments." Stop worrying about trying to read people,
read their body language and every nuance of their movements, and start being honest
for a change.

>Was it possible that other
>women could be as trusting as me and end up in the same situation?

Not likely, because most other women are a little less cold blooded about things as
Anna Kubit is.

>I am confident that I will compile much data
>that could make a difference between you keeping your good name or
>becoming a victim like me.

Finally, we see what's really behind the scenes here. Anna Kubit has a victim
mentality. She's the victim, everyone else is the bad guys. She can't grasp the
plain, ultra-simple concept of what she does: uses and deceives people. She does no
wrong to others, they only do it to her. This is her thinking as you can clearly see.

>Maybe Steve was one
>of my 20 min coffee dates that did not impress me and he had a bad problem
>with rejection.

Or maybe what she did, was much, much worse. Maybe she lied to a deceived someone on
a massive scale, and now just can't fit it into her small mind as to why they might
be a bit upset.

>What triggers negative, angry or otherwise scary behavior in the people
>who you know? If you mention x to that person – what happens? Make
>a list of these things and be sure not to say them to the person

Put another way, be a fake, phony, manipulative, just as she's always advocated at
least as far as her own behavior. Nothing new here.

>You’d be surprised at how mean
>someone that you might not know that much can get if you confront or
>anger him/her.

Especially if you blatantly lie to them or screw them over in a really big way.
That's usually the reaction to something like that. Of course, Anna Kubit expects
people to be good boys or girls and take whatever she has to dish out without
question.

>You don’t need to deal with how rebellious someone can
>get for something as little as your opinion. So express, that what you are
>saying is ONLY your opinion.

Rebellious, rebellious?! Because they're calling her out on her crap? Yes it hurts
when her behavior is discovered for what it is.

_____________________________________________

Dave Shmitz Wrote:

In the archives and remnants of a once-was Florida based web site called Don?t Get
Played.com, it seems that you were voted by men in or around Naples as (not my words)
the "#1 skank of Naples and completely "undateable" material." Apparently the web
site was shut down in April of this year.

What?s funny is that out of the several men who posted your picture there, out of the
selectable eight check-boxes that supposedly made you "undateable" material, the same
four check-boxes were checked in each case, with each guy's rant. They were:
-manipulative, -prick-tease, -deceitful and -bad lay.

Under the picture and check-boxes, in the 'description' area (where people could
explain *why* someone is "undateable"), one gentleman stated that you and he went out
for a night on the town. Had dinner, coffee, etc., were laughing and having a
greatest time. He goes on to say that you later invited him back to your house (he
did mention there was old food, dirty plates and eating utensils laying around).
Moreover that you, in short order, dimmed the existing light, lit candles, lit
incense, and put on soft music. All of this only for you to send him packing 15
minutes later for no apparent reason.

I'm sure that, as the men here now think about this happening to them and how that
would feel, they would see you in a rather unpleasant way.

I don't know about the rest of the claims. They may be considered true, or not. But
this is definitely deceitful, manipulative, and in any guy's opinion, would be
considered a major prick-tease
____________________________________________

Anna Kubit never did directly address Dave Shmitz's question, she conveniently side
stepped that issue.

>Be more secretive.

Translation: be even MORE deceptive! Will Anna Kubit ever learn? It was, in part, her
deception and deliberate misdirection that got her in trouble in the first place. And
now she is advocating this very same behavior to women in e-books she writes and
distributes! Real great "dating coach."

> If he proves worth it, you can always tell him more in due
>time.

What if he's waiting to see if she's worth it? Anna Kubit is one of those types that
believes that because of her God given physical equipment, that she can view and
treat men as toys, playing with them and picking and choosing at her leisure. She
hasn't yet realized we've moved into the 21st century.

>I thought that the men who I associated
>with liked me, respected me and I never, ever thought that they would write
>something like this about me –

Here's the simple truth. Up until now, as much manipulation and deceit that Anna
Kubit has dished out, she has never met an individual who was willing to finally call
her on her crap. They've all put up with it in hopes that she might throw them a
bone. They make no waves or point out her atrocious behavior for fear she "might not
like them." Most men don't have the stones to do it. Most, not all. It's that simple.

>not me; an aspiring motivational
>speaker/author, business consultant – me, a young, sweet, nice, young, female
>professional.

Anna Kubit omits a lot of the other sides of her personality.

I suggest to anyone that you read her e-book. It's entertaining. ;-)

Oh yeah, here's the link:

www.datingconsulting.com/free_ebook.html

Hmm, so "Steve," because I advocate that women shouldn't open up as
quickly as they normally do, it makes me deceptive and manipulative? I
advocate friendship first - what's wrong with that?

I never used men for any kind of experiments - that's all in your head
for who knows what reason. I date in hope of finding Mr. Right for me -
for a meaningful, long term, loving relationship. And some of the men I
turned down - can tell you just that - that I wanted something more
than just fun, or that I didn't feel there was chemistry enough so I
put an end to it right there and then -- normal behavior. But, yep in
your mind that would automatically make me deceptive, manipulative and
doing experiments on men - only because I have not found the right one
yet, correct? So because I chose to be a dating consultant, it
automatically means that I experiment on men? I survey people - I ask
questions, I read on the topic of men/women, observe and gain most of
my knowledge that way.

Your logic is flawed Steve. Any point can be argued in a million
different ways - we all know that. Still, it's just opinions and
theories - and not facts. Let's talk about facts here.

1. "Steve," prove please that my businesses are a scam.
2. Prove that I have AIDS.
3. Prove that I am deceptive and manipulative. Give actual anecdotal
evidence and present it in a way that it's valid - a recorded
conversation for instance with someone's real name and contact info -
and please someone who actually knows me - a photo will be nice as I am
visual and remember faces better than names. You can have the 1st shot
and then I can comment on the validity of your proof.

You talk about playing fair - ok -- then let's play fair and talk about
the facts.

Give me solid evidence that I am in fact manipulative and deceptive.
How about if you prove it by for instance having someone who felt
manipulated by me call me to talk about it.

It'd be great to hear about what your REAL problem with me is as well,
while we are at it - as it's not AIDS, as I don't have it.

The records of the entries on me on that site you mention are nowhere
to be found - so I am led to believe that you are lying about this as
you are lying about too many other things. Prove it that this was
written about me - give us a link.

Steve, you lied about me having AIDS. YOU LIED - and that makes you
very non-credible on the topic of me, I think. Why would people listen
to a liar? Think about it. It's my policy and rule to tell people who I
know/meet (at least over the last few months since one of my mentors
taught me a related valuable lesson) to please tell me the truth always
and hope that they do. I have gotten feedback that was not positive
before - and I love that feedback as it makes me grow as a person. I
want to know my mistakes and I welcome that feedback. In a recent email
series I had asked for feedback from people who I know or who I have
met and I said in there - that I would like the negative comments too
;-) You are right in that many people do not have the guts to tell
others what they see or what they believe. But how can you talk about
having guts if you never brought your issue up with me directly?(still
you haven't actually told us the issue by the way - again it's not AIDS
- so admit to lying about that already). If you believe so strongly in
feedback - then please give me some feedback. Talk to me about what I
did wrong in person - in detail, specifically, without lies about aids
and other thing that you make up. Tell me what I did that was hurtful
to you and I will be happy to try to correct what I did wrong - but
"Steve," I cannot do so if you do not tell me what's really wrong here.

We all make mistakes and it's part of being human. I would like to fix
my past mistakes or wrongful actions - give me the chance to do so.
People miscommunicate and misunderstand each other all the time - most
people will talk out their problem instead of posting it all over
google - very, very mean what you did. I'm happy to talk with you - but
for some reason you don't seem interested in talking to me, which
contradicts much of your reasoning and beliefs in your posts.

Oh and yes - the INTRO ebook is about me and my story - that was the
point of the INTRO ebook - to share my story and my point of view on
this topic of internet defamation and then to give some pointers to
women which I believe may help in avoiding lies from the "Steves" of
this world. See I do not even know if I know you or not as you won't
disclose your real identity or your real age - but I bet that IF I did
meet you before through a dating site as you claim; you wouldn't be so
very upset if I took my time and only allowed for friendship. But then
again - that could make you furious if you are someone who cannot take
no for an answer. Either way, it's best to take it slow in my opinion.
I learned that jumping into things too quickly can ruin a good thing,
so I recommend that today's women take their time and that they be more
honest and up front about their needs, beliefs, etc. so that
misunderstandings like this one are not as likely to occur. The INTRO
ebook is a 1st version write without edits as noted. I will be editing
it for clarity and giving much more thought and research to it prior to
it being revised and then written as a full ebook. ;-)

Have a great weekend everyone!

Anna



Steve wrote:
> Oh yeah, here's the link:
>
> www.datingconsulting.com/free_ebook.html