 |  | | The Future of MFW. Discuss The Future of MFW, on Health Forums.
| | 
11-10-2006, 03:30 AM
| | | The Future of MFW | 
11-10-2006, 07:10 AM
| | | Re: The Future of MFW John Williams wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/ynaj6l
I'm watching Akeelah and the Bee - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0437800/
- starring Angela Bassett, she of gorgeous face and stunning biceps,
Laurence Fishburne, and Keke Palmer as supah speeler Akeelah Anderson.
Hypertrophic could be heard as a spelling word during the film's
fictional district competition.
Sweet.
Anyway.
Williams, Williams, Williams. Rec.arts.bodyart's denizens are those you
would typically dismiss due to their numerous piercings and incredible
ink yet you're using their behavior via the offered URL to... do...
what? You're a hypocrite grasping at straws, imo. The future of MFW? It
ain't you.
And as I stated previously, you're entirely predictable. It is
apparently your habit to skulk around and then make some attempt at a
diminishing comment as a result of your wondrous discoveries. Oooooh!
Regardless, comparing MFW to RAB is akin to comparing apples to oranges
or, perhaps more accurately, anvils to mixed epithelial and mesenchymal
cells. ;o)
I doubt that any of the current MFW patrons will be leaving due to my
presence, however if you'd like to be the first to do so, well, door,
ass, etc., pal. You recently received a compliment from PV, iirc, re
your somethingsomething knowledge wrt somethingsomething, but if I'm
not mistaken they also mentioned your poor attitude.
(Googles)
Character.
Get some, John. Get some.
And since you lean on the RAB archives so heavily, perhaps you'll
appreciate these words:
Don't blame your disappointment, seeming misery and dissatisfaction on
me.
Perhaps you saw that quote during your RAB searches. ;o) Directly
applicable to your situation, imo.
Good luck with that, Mr. Long Row To Hoe.
--
Curt | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | Re: The Future of MFW In article <oep7l2t2ej8lf41jhhdf3e45mkm3khrj1g@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/ynaj6l
Geez. I didn't even show up. That's a switch. ;-)
Guess I'll have to try a bit harder?
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Omelet wrote:
> JMW wrote:
>
> > http://tinyurl.com/ynaj6l
>
> Geez. I didn't even show up.
Weeeeeeeell, you *did* show up on MFW's October stats.
Twice.
That puts you at 304 posts for the month.
Of course, so did JMW. His combined total being 250.
The stats list I refer to offers the following.
Shute in 2nd place with 306 posts.
Bully in 3rd spot with 287.
Charles almost tied, but at 4th with 285.
Pete 5th then with 264.
And in sixth place, John Williams tallying 205 posts for the month.
If your two posting addresses are combined, Om, then Bully is bumped
from the bronze medal to the 4th position which pushes Charles, Pete,
and Johnny down a placing as well.
Fwiw, yes, I have a very comfortable "lead" with four hundred and seven
frigging posts. Note: It's fun. It could be called stress relief. That,
and I do not watch any television. I don't even have a TV at home. I do
have a laptop and recently watched the stunning Akeelah and the Bee and
the rather disappointing first four episodes of season two of Lost.
Maaan, forGET pushing that button. I'm already ship (or plane) wrecked.
I say let the 108 minutes expire without pressing the button. Maybe
something nice will happen. ;o)
Oh. Sidetracked.
The full list:
MFW Top 25 Users
[407] Curt James <curtjames at gmail.com> 9.1%
[306] Shute <Shute at nowhere.com> 6.8%
[287] Bully <bully1 at proteinbars.co.ok> 6.4%
[285] Charles <jrh at msn.com> 6.4%
[264] Pete <phoutstra at wanadoo.nl> 5.9%
[205] JMW <jmwilliams at enforcergraphics.f2s.com> 4.6%
[182] Andrzej Rosa <bakters at yahoo.com> 4.1%
[158] OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp.omelet at gmail.com> 3.5%
[146] OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp_omelet at gmail.com> 3.3%
[102] Robert Schuh <rschuh at hameggsyahoo.com> 2.3%
[99] David Cohen <sammiesdad at earthlink.net> 2.2%
[95] David <forgotwhy at yahoo.com.au> 2.1%
[82] Steve Freides <steve at fridayscomputer.com> 1.8%
[68] kcmunchkin <kcmunchkin at gmail.com> 1.5%
[67] Hobbes <khobman800 at yahoo.com> 1.5%
[59] Henry <911 at insidejob.gov> 1.3%
[53] John Hanson <jhanson at northernlinks.com> 1.2%
[46] Dally <Dally at myself.com> 1.0%
[45] JMW <jmwilliams_56 at yahoo.com> 1.0%
[39] Tom Anderson <twic at urchin.earth.li> 0.9%
[35] fish. <fishcakes at tanksville.com> 0.8%
[32] Lee Michaels <leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast.net> 0.7%
[31] Will Brink <willbrink at comcast.net> 0.7%
[31] Proctologically Violated©® <entropic3.14decay at
optonline2.718.net> 0.7%
[30] Jason Earl <jearl at xmission.com> 0.7%
MFW Top 10 Thread
[402] HST simplified...please 8.96%
[187] Dally returns! 4.17%
[156] OMG... True story 3.48%
[113] gaining muscles.. 2.52%
[113] OT (happy, cohen?): gun illiterate 2.52%
[91] A Question for the Engineers Among You 2.03%
[88] Conspiracy theorists help 9-11 truth movement... 1.96%
[87] proposal for a new group 1.94%
[85] Only 16% of U.S. citizens believe Bush regime... 1.90%
[80] Almost no equipment training (On Topic). 1.78%
[...]
> Guess I'll have to try a bit harder?
I'd say you're doing fine, actually. ;o)
> Peace, Om
--
Curt | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)
"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
Omelet wrote:
> JMW wrote:
>
> > http://tinyurl.com/ynaj6l
>
> Geez. I didn't even show up.
Weeeeeeeell, you *did* show up on MFW's October stats.
Twice.
That puts you at 304 posts for the month.
Of course, so did JMW. His combined total being 250.
The stats list I refer to offers the following.
Shute in 2nd place with 306 posts.
Bully in 3rd spot with 287.
Charles almost tied, but at 4th with 285.
Pete 5th then with 264.
And in sixth place, John Williams tallying 205 posts for the month.
If your two posting addresses are combined, Om, then Bully is bumped
from the bronze medal to the 4th position which pushes Charles, Pete,
and Johnny down a placing as well.
Fwiw, yes, I have a very comfortable "lead" with four hundred and seven
frigging posts. Note: It's fun. It could be called stress relief. That,
and I do not watch any television. I don't even have a TV at home. I do
have a laptop and recently watched the stunning Akeelah and the Bee and
the rather disappointing first four episodes of season two of Lost.
Maaan, forGET pushing that button. I'm already ship (or plane) wrecked.
I say let the 108 minutes expire without pressing the button. Maybe
something nice will happen. ;o)
Oh. Sidetracked.
The full list:
MFW Top 25 Users
[407] Curt James <curtjames at gmail.com> 9.1%
[306] Shute <Shute at nowhere.com> 6.8%
[287] Bully <bully1 at proteinbars.co.ok> 6.4%
[285] Charles <jrh at msn.com> 6.4%
[264] Pete <phoutstra at wanadoo.nl> 5.9%
[205] JMW <jmwilliams at enforcergraphics.f2s.com> 4.6%
[182] Andrzej Rosa <bakters at yahoo.com> 4.1%
[158] OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp.omelet at gmail.com> 3.5%
[146] OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp_omelet at gmail.com> 3.3%
[102] Robert Schuh <rschuh at hameggsyahoo.com> 2.3%
[99] David Cohen <sammiesdad at earthlink.net> 2.2%
[95] David <forgotwhy at yahoo.com.au> 2.1%
[82] Steve Freides <steve at fridayscomputer.com> 1.8%
[68] kcmunchkin <kcmunchkin at gmail.com> 1.5%
[67] Hobbes <khobman800 at yahoo.com> 1.5%
[59] Henry <911 at insidejob.gov> 1.3%
[53] John Hanson <jhanson at northernlinks.com> 1.2%
[46] Dally <Dally at myself.com> 1.0%
[45] JMW <jmwilliams_56 at yahoo.com> 1.0%
[39] Tom Anderson <twic at urchin.earth.li> 0.9%
[35] fish. <fishcakes at tanksville.com> 0.8%
[32] Lee Michaels <leemichaels*nadaspam* at comcast.net> 0.7%
[31] Will Brink <willbrink at comcast.net> 0.7%
[31] Proctologically Violated©® <entropic3.14decay at
optonline2.718.net> 0.7%
[30] Jason Earl <jearl at xmission.com> 0.7%
However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling, reverse trolling,
antitrolling, personal grudges and general bitch fights, paranoid delusions
by Mr Hankey, and all idiotic posts by Poop Shute, the picture changes
entirely.
David | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Hey, David, what's up with your quoting? Hosed, brah.
Fixed below.
Cohen wrote:
-=snipl=-
re lots 'n lots 'n lots of posts
> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling, reverse trolling,
> antitrolling, personal grudges and general bitch fights, paranoid delusions
> by <snip>, and all idiotic posts by <snip>, the picture changes
> entirely.
Agreed.
I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
> David
--
Curt | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)
"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
> Hey, David, what's up with your quoting? Hosed, brah.
That happens occasionally. Don't know why. Maybe one of the computer geeks
have an answer.
>> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling, reverse
>> trolling,
>> antitrolling, personal grudges and general bitch fights, paranoid
>> delusions
>> by <snip>, and all idiotic posts by <snip>, the picture changes
>> entirely.
You snipped Mr Hankey and Poop Shute! I didn't know you were a mohel.
> Agreed.
>
> I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
0.1% trolling and pointy stick moron poking.
David | 
11-10-2006, 11:07 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Cohen wrote:
> "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
(Cohen wrote)
[...]
> >> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling,
> >> reverse trolling, antitrolling, personal grudges and general
> >> bitch fights, paranoid delusions by <snip>, and all idiotic
> >> posts by <snip>, the picture changes entirely.
>
> You snipped Mr Hankey and Poop Shute! I didn't know you
> were a mohel.
Perhaps a maven and I would say a mensch but not a mohel. Likely more
prone to chasing zaftig shiksa than schlepping for schlong. Ymmv.
> > Agreed.
> >
> > I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
>
> Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
>
> 0.1% trolling and pointy stick moron poking.
Okay.
(Meshuggener.)
> David
--
Curt | 
11-10-2006, 11:08 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <%U45h.4864$l25.3434@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling, reverse trolling,
> antitrolling, personal grudges and general bitch fights, paranoid delusions
> by Mr Hankey, and all idiotic posts by Poop Shute, the picture changes
> entirely.
>
> David
<smiles> So I was in third place...
Sorry for changing the e-mail addy. I was trying to cut spam to the
gmail account.
The _ causes e-mails to bounce. The . did not.
Where do you fine these stats?
Oh, and here is another t-shirt for you. I'm debating getting this one
as a range shirt also: http://www.thoseshirts.com/select.html
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-10-2006, 11:08 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Omelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <%U45h.4864$l25.3434@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling, reverse trolling,
>> antitrolling, personal grudges and general bitch fights, paranoid delusions
>> by Mr Hankey, and all idiotic posts by Poop Shute, the picture changes
>> entirely.
>>
>> David
>
><smiles> So I was in third place...
>
>Sorry for changing the e-mail addy. I was trying to cut spam to the
>gmail account.
>
>The _ causes e-mails to bounce. The . did not.
>
>Where do you fine these stats?
>
>Oh, and here is another t-shirt for you. I'm debating getting this one
>as a range shirt also:
>
>http://www.thoseshirts.com/select.html
<heh> http://www.thoseshirts.com/cat.html | 
11-10-2006, 11:08 PM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:33:36 GMT, "David Cohen"
<sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
>> Hey, David, what's up with your quoting? Hosed, brah.
>
>That happens occasionally. Don't know why. Maybe one of the computer geeks
>have an answer.
Yeah I am sure one of those "geeks" would be so happy to help out a
fuckwit like yourself. I am sure random stupid stuff happens on your
computer on all the time. As we say in the business the problem is
between the keyboard and the chair.
>Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
Extremely off topic is more like it. | 
11-11-2006, 09:30 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Omelet wrote:
[...]
> <smiles> So I was in third place...
Om, fwiw, you were only three posts from the second position.
[...]
> Where do you fine these stats? http://www.mailgate.org/ although I'm certain there are other sources.
As of this writing, Pete's in the first position with 158 posts, yours
truly is next with 151, Bully at 148, Shute at 137, Charles at 110 and
you with your underscore-added gmail address firmly in the sixth spot
with 106 posts.
Hmm. Maybe not firmly, though, as what'shisface with two posting
addresses was immediately following you on the list. Combining whatever
post counts he had split between the two addresses... I closed that
browser and don't care especially anyway.
I regularly posts stats in another ng, but haven't taken great interest
in it here until my bestestest pal, what'shisface, posted the stats
post from that alternate ng to MFW for reasons known only to him. Most
likely a jab of some weak sort.
Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts most or least.
I just like to write and read and, certainly, weights and fitness -
like tattoos and motorcycles - are subjects that keep my attention.
[...]
> Peace, Om
--
Curt | 
11-11-2006, 09:30 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) Curt wrote:
>
> Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts most or least.
> I just like to write and read and, certainly, weights and fitness -
> like tattoos and motorcycles - are subjects that keep my attention.
And Curt is all about attention. | 
11-11-2006, 09:30 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) John Williams wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> >
> > Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts
> > most or least. I just like to write and read and, certainly,
> > weights and fitness - like tattoos and motorcycles - are
> > subjects that keep my attention.
>
> And Curt is all about attention.
You're not? But enough about you!  )
Yes, luckily, you're here to shine a spotlight on all that is Curt.
Seriously, you don't want me to have attention then don't start a
frigging post that offers a link to a post that I wrote in another
newsgroup. What's your deal, Johnny? What don't you get?
Johnny: "Boy, I don't want to get any paint on my new white shirt. Let
me just open this can of black paint and pour it directly on my new
white shirt. Oh, dear, I got paint on my new white shirt."
You're not very bright, are you, John?
--
Curt | 
11-11-2006, 09:30 AM
| | | OT: JMW, cross-poster (was Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)) John Williams wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> >
> > Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts most or least.
> > I just like to write and read and, certainly, weights and fitness -
> > like tattoos and motorcycles - are subjects that keep my attention.
>
> And Curt is all about attention.
Just for the record, John Williams thought he'd be somethingsomething
as he recently cross-posted to another newsgroup that I frequent. He
tried this tactic with the folks at the motorcycle ng and was met by a
well-deserved wall of silence. Some of you may, however, remember at
least one RAB patron visiting here previously. And what a delight that
was.
Good looking out for the best interests of misc.fitness.weights,
counselor. HA!
Nice one, Johnny.
Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!m73g2000cwd .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "JMW" <jmwilliams_56 at yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: misc.fitness.weights,rec.arts.bodyart
Subject: Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)
Date: 10 Nov 2006 23:39:23 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <1163230763.716326.65340@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups. com>
References: <oep7l2t2ej8lf41jhhdf3e45mkm3khrj1g@4ax.com>
<omp_omelet-A78AA5.13055710112006@news.giganews.com>
<1163188219.802683.99330@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups. com>
<%U45h.4864$l25.3434@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink. net>
<omp_omelet-14CFDE.15145910112006@news.giganews.com>
<1163227979.233538.105360@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.140.43.39
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1163230769 13160 127.0.0.1 (11 Nov 2006
07:39:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:39:29 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=24.140.43.39;
posting-account=M9dSEwwAAACjyHhWXsXb3jSxA00BiSWO
Curt wrote:
--
Curt | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <41s9l298haqni1ommmqps2m1jjvij92gg0@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> >Oh, and here is another t-shirt for you. I'm debating getting this one
> >as a range shirt also:
> >
> >http://www.thoseshirts.com/select.html
>
> <heh> http://www.thoseshirts.com/cat.html
I saw that... ;-)
But I was disqualified from wearing it as I consider myself to be a
conservative liberal,
but it's still a funny shirt!
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <1163227979.233538.105360@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> Omelet wrote:
> [...]
>
> > <smiles> So I was in third place...
>
> Om, fwiw, you were only three posts from the second position.
>
> [...]
>
> > Where do you fine these stats?
>
> http://www.mailgate.org/ although I'm certain there are other sources.
Hope so. I don't want to have to sign on to another website. :-p
I get too much spam as it is!
>
> As of this writing, Pete's in the first position with 158 posts, yours
> truly is next with 151, Bully at 148, Shute at 137, Charles at 110 and
> you with your underscore-added gmail address firmly in the sixth spot
> with 106 posts.
Cool.
I did post a LOT while I was on vacation but I've been a bit busy this
week. I'm still sitting on Dally's last thread to peruse at my leisure.
I'm hosting a special dinner Sunday night so I have some house cleaning
and prep work to do today, then I have to cook and entertain tomorrow.
Grilled cornish game hen etc. Gotta soak my grills and clean the BBQ
today. Just got off work so I'm taking a break until Target opens.
>
> Hmm. Maybe not firmly, though, as what'shisface with two posting
> addresses was immediately following you on the list. Combining whatever
> post counts he had split between the two addresses... I closed that
> browser and don't care especially anyway.
I don't anticipate making any more changes anytime soon .
>
> I regularly posts stats in another ng, but haven't taken great interest
> in it here until my bestestest pal, what'shisface, posted the stats
> post from that alternate ng to MFW for reasons known only to him. Most
> likely a jab of some weak sort.
>
> Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts most or least.
> I just like to write and read and, certainly, weights and fitness -
> like tattoos and motorcycles - are subjects that keep my attention.
>
Trivia is entertaining. :-)
I'd like to get a local group together for Trivial Pursuit. I've not
played in years and it's more fun if you team up.
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)
"Omelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news  mp_omelet-3E6E23.07255311112006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <1163227979.233538.105360@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Where do you fine these stats?
>>
>> http://www.mailgate.org/ although I'm certain there are other sources.
>
> Hope so. I don't want to have to sign on to another website. :-p
> I get too much spam as it is!
>
Hi Om,
You can also get them through Google. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mis...ts/about?hl=en
This month's top posters
165 phouts...@wanadoo.nl
159 bul...@proteinbars.co.ok
156 Curt
139 s...@nowhere.com
117 j...@msn.com
109 omp_ome...@gmail.com
100 jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com
87 entropic3.14de...@optonline2.718.net
82 bakt...@yahoo.com
63 sammies...@earthlink.net
All time top posters
17690 lyle...@onr.com
15999 wat...@watsonmusic.com
12830 jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com
11754 sammies...@earthlink.net
9432 gsty...@ix.netcom.com
9316 parno...@ix.netcom.com
7694 forgot...@yahoo.com.au
7616 rsc...@ix.netcom.com
7351 wrobe...@grove.ufl.edu
7190 robertd...@japan.com
Bill | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <5Ik5h.15201$Zy3.3115@newsfe2-win.ntli.net>,
"Bill" <bunce@mangle.mon> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> You can also get them through Google.
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mis...ts/about?hl=en
Cool, so how would I get Octobers or further back?
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) "Bill" <bunce@mangle.mon> schreef:
> This month's top posters
> 165 phouts...@wanadoo.nl
I am Numero Uno!
The way it should be.
> 159 bul...@proteinbars.co.ok
Ha!
> 156 Curt
Ha!
> 139 s...@nowhere.com
> 117 j...@msn.com
> 109 omp_ome...@gmail.com
> 100 jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com
> 87 entropic3.14de...@optonline2.718.net
> 82 bakt...@yahoo.com
> 63 sammies...@earthlink.net
> All time top posters
> 17690 lyle...@onr.com
Jesus Christ... Close to 20.000!
> 15999 wat...@watsonmusic.com
> 12830 jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com
> 11754 sammies...@earthlink.net
> 9432 gsty...@ix.netcom.com
> 9316 parno...@ix.netcom.com
> 7694 forgot...@yahoo.com.au
Huh? David?
> 7616 rsc...@ix.netcom.com
> 7351 wrobe...@grove.ufl.edu
> 7190 robertd...@japan.com
I did a search between July 1 1998 and July 1 2000.
I got 3710 hits
I doubt if anyone can top that...
----
Pete | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:
>The full list:
>MFW Top 25 Users
[407] Curt James <curtjames at gmail.com> 9.1%
[306] Shute <Shute at nowhere.com> 6.8%
[287] Bully <bully1 at proteinbars.co.ok> 6.4%
[285] Charles <jrh at msn.com> 6.4%
[264] Pete <phoutstra at wanadoo.nl> 5.9%
I want to be number one...
I am going to number one...
And nobody, NOBODY can stop me!
>MFW Top 10 Thread
[402] HST simplified...please 8.96%
[187] Dally returns! 4.17%
[156] OMG... True story 3.48%
[113] gaining muscles.. 2.52%
[113] OT (happy, cohen?): gun illiterate 2.52%
[91] A Question for the Engineers Among You 2.03%
[88] Conspiracy theorists help 9-11 truth movement... 1.96%
[87] proposal for a new group 1.94%
[85] Only 16% of U.S. citizens believe Bush regime... 1.90%
[80] Almost no equipment training (On Topic). 1.78%
This pisses me off.
I want to start a thread that will top this...
----
Pete | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> schreef:
> However, quantity =/= quality.
Thanks for pointing that out, David.
I am sure you meant that the quality of my posts are second to none. Thanks!
> If we eliminate trolling, reverse trolling, antitrolling, personal grudges
> and general bitch fights...
Then YOU guys would have nothing to talk about.
> paranoid delusions...
The *I* would have nothing to talk about.
The end of MFW. As we know it.
----
Pete | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In rec.arts.bodyart Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Williams wrote:
>> Curt wrote:
>> >
>> > Regardless, stats are fun trivia. I don't care who posts
>> > most or least. I just like to write and read and, certainly,
>> > weights and fitness - like tattoos and motorcycles - are
>> > subjects that keep my attention.
>>
>> And Curt is all about attention.
>
> You're not? But enough about you! )
>
> Yes, luckily, you're here to shine a spotlight on all that is Curt.
>
> Seriously, you don't want me to have attention then don't start a
> frigging post that offers a link to a post that I wrote in another
> newsgroup. What's your deal, Johnny? What don't you get?
>
> Johnny: "Boy, I don't want to get any paint on my new white shirt. Let
> me just open this can of black paint and pour it directly on my new
> white shirt. Oh, dear, I got paint on my new white shirt."
>
> You're not very bright, are you, John?
>
Nice. Everyone still hates curt, as per norm.
-----yttrx
-- http://www.yttrx.net | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)
"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163192584.895182.201400@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> Cohen wrote:
>> "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
> (Cohen wrote)
>
> [...]
>
>> >> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling,
>> >> reverse trolling, antitrolling, personal grudges and general
>> >> bitch fights, paranoid delusions by <snip>, and all idiotic
>> >> posts by <snip>, the picture changes entirely.
>>
>> You snipped Mr Hankey and Poop Shute! I didn't know you
>> were a mohel.
>
> Perhaps a maven and I would say a mensch but not a mohel. Likely more
> prone to chasing zaftig shiksa than schlepping for schlong. Ymmv.
>
>> > Agreed.
>> >
>> > I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
>>
>> Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
>>
>> 0.1% trolling and pointy stick moron poking.
>
> Okay.
>
> (Meshuggener.)
>
>> David
>
> --
> Curt
>
Schlepping for schlong? | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <45562d53_1@news.iprimus.com.au>, "Mike" <Mike@home.com>
wrote:
> > Perhaps a maven and I would say a mensch but not a mohel. Likely more
> > prone to chasing zaftig shiksa than schlepping for schlong. Ymmv.
> >
> >> > Agreed.
> >> >
> >> > I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
> >>
> >> Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
> >>
> >> 0.1% trolling and pointy stick moron poking.
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > (Meshuggener.)
> >
> >> David
> >
> > --
> > Curt
> >
> Schlepping for schlong?
<cough>
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In article <fyq5h.116$wV.24@fe176.usenetserver.com>, yttrx@yttrx.net (yttrx) wrote:
> In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > yttrx@yttrx.net (yttrx) wrote:
> >>
> >>Nice. Everyone still hates curt, as per norm.
> >
> > But few express it as well as you did:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...fb2b733?hl=en&
> > (http://tinyurl.com/yfvtzz)
> >
> > Many thanks.
>
> Ah, I forgot about that! Thanks yerself.
>
>
>
>
> -----yttrx
>
>
That _was_ rather eloquent...
One can always appreciate a variegated vocabulary
and creativity in the insult department. ;-)
What was the reply?
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Yiddish ROCKS! (was Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)) Mike wrote:
> "Curt" wrote
> > Cohen wrote:
> >> "Curt" wrote
> > (Cohen wrote)
> > [...]
> >
> >> >> However, quantity =/= quality. If we eliminate trolling,
> >> >> reverse trolling, antitrolling, personal grudges and general
> >> >> bitch fights, paranoid delusions by <snip>, and all idiotic
> >> >> posts by <snip>, the picture changes entirely.
> >>
> >> You snipped Mr Hankey and Poop Shute! I didn't know you
> >> were a mohel.
> >
> > Perhaps a maven and I would say a mensch but not a mohel.
> > Likely more prone to chasing zaftig shiksa than schlepping
> > for schlong. Ymmv.
> >
> >> > Agreed.
> >> >
> >> > I'm curious what category you'd drop your post into, however.
> >>
> >> Extremely high quality, as are 99.9% of my posts.
> >>
> >> 0.1% trolling and pointy stick moron poking.
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > (Meshuggener.)
[...]
> Schlepping for schlong?
heh ;o)
Not that that's a bad thing.
No, you will find me chasing the zaftig shiksa in their low cut blouses
and short skirts, however. I would never schlep for schlong. Not my
nature.
Yes, not to kibitz but this goy, perhaps something of a klutz, believes
that Yiddish rocks! While others may kvetch and kvetch about
immigration and insurgents, I offer a toast to Yiddish: "l'chaim!"
In fact, cheers to all languages. I have a French course somewhere
around here, several Spanish courses, both CD and text, have taken two
years of Spanish in h.s. and both Spanish and German in college. I can
effectively communicate "Where's the bathroom?" and "i NEED beer!" in
slurred English (after two drinks). And, yeah, I can politely ask my
students to have a seat and "Look here!" in Spanish. ;o) I've even
acted as a substitute teacher in a Latin class and know the correct
pronunciation of Veni, vidi, vici.
Regardless, I admire anyone who can speak more than one language. (Go
Pete!) There's a teacher in the school district who speaks eight! The
one local convenience store speaks five. And a since-moved neighbor,
graduate of Carlisle's Dickinson College spoke Chinese fluently.
Spanish, to me, sounds like music when spoken. I need a Spanish
girlfriend. She could complain all day long and I'd smile. That's not
the case in English, unfortunately.
Well, before this post becomes even more of a megillah, I'll end with a
hearty Mazel tov to my MFW mishpocha.
--
Curt | 
11-12-2006, 02:29 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) In rec.arts.bodyart Omelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <fyq5h.116$wV.24@fe176.usenetserver.com>,
> yttrx@yttrx.net (yttrx) wrote:
>
>> In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> > yttrx@yttrx.net (yttrx) wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Nice. Everyone still hates curt, as per norm.
>> >
>> > But few express it as well as you did:
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...fb2b733?hl=en&
>> > (http://tinyurl.com/yfvtzz)
>> >
>> > Many thanks.
>>
>> Ah, I forgot about that! Thanks yerself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----yttrx
>>
>>
>
> That _was_ rather eloquent...
>
> One can always appreciate a variegated vocabulary
> and creativity in the insult department. ;-)
>
> What was the reply? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...abf9203fb2b733
Really not much of one from curt.
-----yttrx
-- http://www.yttrx.net | 
11-13-2006, 05:55 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:25:52 -0500, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
>yttrx@yttrx.net (yttrx) wrote:
>>
>>Nice. Everyone still hates curt, as per norm.
>
>But few express it as well as you did:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...fb2b733?hl=en&
>(http://tinyurl.com/yfvtzz)
>
>Many thanks.
He was far too nice to that piece of shit loser with no life. Curt
ought to do himself and the world a favor and off himself. | 
11-13-2006, 05:55 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) John Hanson wrote:
[...]
> <snip>piece of shit loser with no life.
Talking about yourself again, Hanson?
> Curt ought to do himself and the world a favor
> and off himself.
Hey, I'll think about that if you ever total more than Jason Burnell,
okay?
L-L-L-L-LOSER! ;o)
And a cross-posting POS loser at that.
Hth.
--
Curt | 
11-13-2006, 05:55 AM
| | | Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW) On 11 Nov 2006 22:05:19 -0800, "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:
>John Hanson wrote:
>[...]
>
>> <snip>piece of shit loser with no life.
>
>Talking about yourself again, Hanson?
>
>> Curt ought to do himself and the world a favor
>> and off himself.
>
>Hey, I'll think about that if you ever total more than Jason Burnell,
>okay?
>
>L-L-L-L-LOSER! ;o)
>
>And a cross-posting POS loser at that.
>
>Hth.
>
You're scum. You're a loser and you're a pile of shit. Everyone
knows that including you. You have no life so you hang out on Usenet
on groups like MFW even though you are a weak and ugly asshole who has
never competed in his life. You can't even out total women who weigh
half your weight. Even Wendy blows you away and she's one of them
fucking runners.
Curt, you have more yesterdays than you do tomorrows. Why don't you
do something with your pathetic life? If you are not hated, you are
only just tolerated. So, either change your worthless self or quit
wasting oxygen. | 
11-13-2006, 05:55 AM
| | | Underoos inna bunch much? (was Re: October 2006 Stats (was Re: The Future of MFW)) John Hanson wrote:
[...]
> >> Curt ought to do himself and the world a favor
> >> and off himself.
I scribbled:
> > Hey, I'll think about that if you ever total more than
> > Jason Burnell, okay?
> >
> >L-L-L-L-LOSER! ;o)
[...]
> You're scum. You're a loser and you're a pile of shit. Everyone
> knows that including you. You have no life so you hang out on Usenet
> on groups like MFW even though you are a weak and ugly asshole who has
> never competed in his life. You can't even out total women who weigh
> half your weight. Even Wendy blows you away and she's one of them
> fucking runners.
>
> Curt, you have more yesterdays than you do tomorrows. Why don't you
> do something with your pathetic life? If you are not hated, you are
> only just tolerated. So, either change your worthless self or quit
> wasting oxygen.
That's awesome. You're like a toy that takes no batteries but just wind
it up a quarter-turn and it goes and goes and goes! You'll never know
how hard I laughed at that.  D
Hey, we missed you at John's party. Enjoy your Sunday, pal. Give my
best to Jason. ;o)
--
Curt | 
11-13-2006, 05:55 AM
| | | Re: Underoos inna bunch much? (was Re: October 2006 Stats (w | | |