Girly Exercises

Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.

Shute wrote:
> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
> mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
> besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.

Adductors and abductors. Apparently, weak adductors *can* limit your squat!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at gym?

"Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:qauti2lpnqhr56vgs0170clt1fi71bcaud@4ax.com...
> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
> mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
> besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>

"ryan scott" <err@fdgfg.55t> schreef:

> do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at gym?

Then you better advice them to do the "manly" exercises.

Like squats, deads, and last but not least, bent over rows.

Which will also result in wonderfull legs, glutes and spinals.

Which are a treat for the eye when they are in a certain position.

----
Pete

"Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> schreef:

> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
> mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
> besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.

I do those exercises after 11pm, when the gym is closed.

I am trying to fluff my inner thighs and medial glutes.

And you know what? I perform those exercises in my girlfriends underwear.

----
Pete

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:57:17 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl>
wrote:

>"Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> schreef:
>
>> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
>> mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
>> besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>
>I do those exercises after 11pm, when the gym is closed.
>
>I am trying to fluff my inner thighs and medial glutes.
>
>And you know what? I perform those exercises in my girlfriends underwear.
>

That's something of an acrobatic feat if she is wearing them, but it
sounds like fun.

Have a great weekend "fluffman" - you can guarantee that I intend to!
;o)

TFIF!

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, ryan scott wrote:

> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:qauti2lpnqhr56vgs0170clt1fi71bcaud@4ax.com...
>
>> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I mean.
>> The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean besides making
>> a me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>
> do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at gym?

No, he means in performing them. To which the answer is a definite yes -
stronger adductors help her to hold on in the 'driving the peg home'
position:

http://www.sexualpositionsfree.com/drivpeghomag.html

tom

--
the meaning is the illocutionary force of interrogativeness with no
propositional content -- Geoffrey K. Pullum

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Tom Anderson wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, ryan scott wrote:
>
>> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:qauti2lpnqhr56vgs0170clt1fi71bcaud@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I mean.
>>> The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean besides making a
>>> me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>>
>> do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at gym?
>
> No, he means in performing them. To which the answer is a definite yes -
> stronger adductors help her to hold on in the 'driving the peg home'
> position:
>
> http://www.sexualpositionsfree.com/drivpeghomag.html

Which, confusingly, wikipedia calls 'stand and carry':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand_and_carry_position

Who's in charge of standard sexual position nomenclature? ISO or the WHO?

tom

--
the meaning is the illocutionary force of interrogativeness with no
propositional content -- Geoffrey K. Pullum

Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, ryan scott wrote:
>
>> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:qauti2lpnqhr56vgs0170clt1fi71bcaud@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I mean.
>>> The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean besides making
>>> a me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>>
>> do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at gym?
>
>No, he means in performing them. To which the answer is a definite yes -
>stronger adductors help her to hold on in the 'driving the peg home'
>position:
>
>http://www.sexualpositionsfree.com/drivpeghomag.html

But they don't get rid of fat in the upper thighs, which why the
girlies are doing them.

JMW wrote:
> Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, ryan scott wrote:
>>
>>> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>> news:qauti2lpnqhr56vgs0170clt1fi71bcaud@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> Is there any benefit to the girly exercises? You know the ones I
>>>> mean. The girls do the leg scissor things in and out. I mean
>>>> besides making a me sweat a little more as I watch them.
>>>
>>> do you mean benefit in watching in them being performed by girls at
>>> gym?
>>
>> No, he means in performing them. To which the answer is a definite
>> yes - stronger adductors help her to hold on in the 'driving the peg
>> home' position:
>>
>> http://www.sexualpositionsfree.com/drivpeghomag.html
>
> But they don't get rid of fat in the upper thighs, which why the
> girlies are doing them.

Yes, correct. They're either toning their thighs or burning of fat.

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:25:15 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>But they don't get rid of fat in the upper thighs, which why the
>girlies are doing them.

Ah that explains it. That is the first intelligent thing I have ever
heard you say. You must have overheard some teenage girls talking
while you looked up their shorts.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:25:15 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>But they don't get rid of fat in the upper thighs, which why the
>>girlies are doing them.
>
>Ah that explains it. That is the first intelligent thing I have ever
>heard you say. You must have overheard some teenage girls talking
>while you looked up their shorts.

Are you related to Bill Davidson?