Giving TM the truth test...

TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion.

Here's my challenge to TM: Prove your assertion. Remember that your proof
needs to include a *distinct* group of people who have BMI's over 40. Are
you going to fail again miserably in your efforts to prove this ludicrous
claim of yours? Your type of propaganda kills people.

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:

> TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
> because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
> death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
> He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion.

Already posted the article with the exact quote. Please look back and
see.

> Here's my challenge to TM: Prove your assertion.

Prove what part of it? The proof that "30 minute brisk walk on most days
of the week is all the exercise you need" is already established in
previous posts. All you have to do is look back in Google groups and find
it. You're welcomed.

> Remember that your proof
> needs to include a *distinct* group of people who have BMI's over 40.

Great, you going to give me the 1.2 million bucks it will take for me to
personally conduct the experiment that you have requested?

On Apr 14, 9:16*pm, for...@futurewebhost.com (Kenny) wrote:
> TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
> because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
> death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
> He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion. *
>
> Here's my challenge to TM: *Prove your assertion. *Remember that your proof
> needs to include a *distinct* group of people who have BMI's over 40. *Are
> you going to fail again miserably in your efforts to prove this ludicrous
> claim of yours? *Your type of propaganda kills people.

Who gives a fuck about your challenge to anybody? As I have asserted
before you are far to stupid to be allowed to live. Your type of
bullshit kills as well. It bores people to death.

W.

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:
>
>>TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
>>because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
>>death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
>>He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion.
>
>Already posted the article with the exact quote. Please look back and see.

Read the challenge again, dumbass.

>
>>Here's my challenge to TM: Prove your assertion.
>
>Prove what part of it? The proof that "30 minute brisk walk on most days
>of the week is all the exercise you need" is already established in
>previous posts. All you have to do is look back in Google groups and find
>it. You're welcomed.

Here's your exact assertion:

From: The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
Subject: Re: Obesity epidemic (TOTALLY acceptable)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:19 +0000
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0804111344260.28048@sdf.lonestar.or g>

"I may be fat, but I CAN walk briskly for 30 minutes... According to the
study, my risk of mortality is the same as a skinny person who can do the
same 30 minute brisk walk."

**end quote**

Prove this claim.

>
>>Remember that your proof
>>needs to include a distinct group of people who have BMI's over 40.
>
>Great, you going to give me the 1.2 million bucks it will take for me to
>personally conduct the experiment that you have requested?

In other words, you are a liar and unable to prove your assertion.

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Brain dead Kenny wrote:

>>> TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
>>> because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
>>> death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
>>> He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion.
>>
>> Already posted the article with the exact quote. Please look back and see.
>
> Read the challenge again, dumbass.

Let's see...

"because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of
premature death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for
30 mintues."

Doctor Blair already did, dumbass.

"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week

"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
have increased mortality," the authors conclude.

>> Prove what part of it? The proof that "30 minute brisk walk on most days
>> of the week is all the exercise you need" is already established in
>> previous posts. All you have to do is look back in Google groups and find
>> it. You're welcomed.
>
> Here's your exact assertion:
>
> From: The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
> Subject: Re: Obesity epidemic (TOTALLY acceptable)
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:19 +0000
> Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0804111344260.28048@sdf.lonestar.or g>
>
> "I may be fat, but I CAN walk briskly for 30 minutes... According to the
> study, my risk of mortality is the same as a skinny person who can do the
> same 30 minute brisk walk."
>
> **end quote**
>
> Prove this claim.

"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week

"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
have increased mortality," the authors conclude.

*victory dance*

Stupid Kenny.

>>> Remember that your proof
>>> needs to include a distinct group of people who have BMI's over 40.
>>
>> Great, you going to give me the 1.2 million bucks it will take for me to
>> personally conduct the experiment that you have requested?
>
> In other words, you are a liar and unable to prove your assertion.

Except for the fact that Dr. Blair already did prove it. I just wanted
your money, stupid Kenny...

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Brain dead Kenny wrote:
>
>>>>TM, who happens to be 35 years old and morbidly obese (BMI 40+), claims
>>>>because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of premature
>>>>death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for 30 mintues.
>>>>He has failed repeatedly to prove this assertion.
>>>
>>>Already posted the article with the exact quote. Please look back and see.
>>
>>Read the challenge again, dumbass.
>
>Let's see...
>
>"because he can walk briskly for 30 mintues, has the same risk of
>premature death as someone who is of normal BMI and can walk briskly for
>30 mintues."
>
>Doctor Blair already did, dumbass.

Nope. That is a selective quote. Keep reading.

>
>"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
>including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
>such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week
>
>"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
>were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
>have increased mortality," the authors conclude.

More selective quotes. Keep reading.

>
>>>Prove what part of it? The proof that "30 minute brisk walk on most days
>>>of the week is all the exercise you need" is already established in
>>>previous posts. All you have to do is look back in Google groups and find
>>>it. You're welcomed.
>>
>>Here's your exact assertion:
>>
>>From: The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>Subject: Re: Obesity epidemic (TOTALLY acceptable)
>>Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:19 +0000
>>Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0804111344260.28048@sdf.lonestar.or g>
>>
>>"I may be fat, but I CAN walk briskly for 30 minutes... According to the
>>study, my risk of mortality is the same as a skinny person who can do the
>>same 30 minute brisk walk."
>>
>>**end quote**
>>
>>Prove this claim.
>
>"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
>including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
>such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week
>
>"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
>were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
>have increased mortality," the authors conclude.
>
>*victory dance*
>
>Stupid Kenny.

Stupid TM. Re-read my challenge. In the study that you are quoting, there
is no distinct group of subjects who have a BMI of 40+.

>
>>>>Remember that your proof
>>>>needs to include a distinct group of people who have BMI's over 40.
>>>
>>>Great, you going to give me the 1.2 million bucks it will take for me to
>>>personally conduct the experiment that you have requested?
>>
>>In other words, you are a liar and unable to prove your assertion.
>
>Except for the fact that Dr. Blair already did prove it. I just wanted
>your money, stupid Kenny...

Once again, the snip and run coward selectively quotes the study.

Again. Here's your exact assertion:

From: The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
Subject: Re: Obesity epidemic (TOTALLY acceptable)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:19 +0000
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0804111344260.28048@sdf.lonestar.or g>

"I may be fat, but I CAN walk briskly for 30 minutes... According to the
study, my risk of mortality is the same as a skinny person who can do the
same 30 minute brisk walk."

**end quote**

The part of the study that you selectively omitted. Quoting the study:

"In the study, obese subjects who were fit had a lower risk of dying than
normal-weight subjects who were physically inactive."

You fail. Again.

Also, there were TWO obese classifications. Obese Class I group (BMI
30-34.9) and Obese Class II group (BMI 35+). The article does not state if
one or both Obese groups were being used to draw this conclusion, nor how
high the BMI of the Obese Class II group went. Most fat acceptors,
including you (unless you want to deny it), have a BMI in excess of 40.
That is the threshold of the clinical definition of morbid obesity.

You fail, dumbass. Miserably.

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Stupid Kenny wrote the following gibberish:

>> "It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
>> including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
>> such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week
>>
>> "Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
>> were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
>> have increased mortality," the authors conclude.
>
> More selective quotes. Keep reading.

Those ARE the quotes, stupid Kenny. I win, you lose. Deal with it. Cry,
bitch, and moan about it all you like stupid Kenny, the fact remains that
"brisk walking 30 minutes or more on most days of the week" is medically
proven to be enough for obese individuals to "not have increased
mortality". Your continued snottyness is only proof that you are
emotionally broken and cannot rationalize facts that don't fit within your
opinions.

In other words, too bad, sucks to be you.

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Stupid Kenny wrote the following gibberish:
>
>>>"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
>>>including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
>>>such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week
>>>
>>>"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
>>>were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
>>>have increased mortality," the authors conclude.
>>
>>More selective quotes. Keep reading.
>
>Those ARE the quotes, stupid Kenny. I win, you lose. Deal with it. Cry,
>bitch, and moan about it all you like stupid Kenny, the fact remains that
>"brisk walking 30 minutes or more on most days of the week" is medically
>proven to be enough for obese individuals to "not have increased
>mortality". Your continued snottyness is only proof that you are
>emotionally broken and cannot rationalize facts that don't fit within your
>opinions.
>
>In other words, too bad, sucks to be you.

You edited out the parts of my post where I completely invalidated your
claim. Snip and run cowardice is not victory, dumbass.

You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
for you in Walmart in a few years.

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:

> You edited out the parts of my post where I...

sounded like a total bitch cry baby? No, I leave them in.

> completely invalidated your
> claim.

Kind of hard to do that, when I have direct quotes from the medical
doctors who conducted the study. You sure you are reading the results
correctly? Or are you saying that you understand their results better
then they do?

On 19 Apr 2008 14:32:07 -0000, foryou@futurewebhost.com (Kenny) wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>wrote:
>>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Stupid Kenny wrote the following gibberish:
>>
>>>>"It may be possible to reduce all-cause death rates among older adults,
>>>>including those who are obese, by promoting regular physical activity,
>>>>such as brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days of the week
>>>>
>>>>"Normal-weight individuals in our study had greater longevity only if they
>>>>were physically fit; furthermore, obese individuals who were fit did not
>>>>have increased mortality," the authors conclude.
>>>
>>>More selective quotes. Keep reading.
>>
>>Those ARE the quotes, stupid Kenny. I win, you lose. Deal with it. Cry,
>>bitch, and moan about it all you like stupid Kenny, the fact remains that
>>"brisk walking 30 minutes or more on most days of the week" is medically
>>proven to be enough for obese individuals to "not have increased
>>mortality". Your continued snottyness is only proof that you are
>>emotionally broken and cannot rationalize facts that don't fit within your
>>opinions.
>>
>>In other words, too bad, sucks to be you.
>
>You edited out the parts of my post where I completely invalidated your
>claim. Snip and run cowardice is not victory, dumbass.

It is the only chance he has at looking like a winner.

Jade

>
>You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>for you in Walmart in a few years.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:04:31 +0000, The Master
<tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:
>
>> You edited out the parts of my post where I...
>
>sounded like a total bitch cry baby? No, I leave them in.
>
>> completely invalidated your
>> claim.
>
>Kind of hard to do that, when I have direct quotes from the medical
>doctors who conducted the study. You sure you are reading the results
>correctly? Or are you saying that you understand their results better
>then they do?
>

Snipnrun coward.

teehee!

Jade

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Daedalus wrote:

> Snipnrun coward.

Single line whore...

Gee, this is fun. How have you been slutmonkey?

Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
news:4cfp0458uugb7g0s9o1quiutphhdrfo2hl@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:04:31 +0000, The Master
> <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:
>>
>>> You edited out the parts of my post where I...
>>
>>sounded like a total bitch cry baby? No, I leave them in.
>>
>>> completely invalidated your
>>> claim.
>>
>>Kind of hard to do that, when I have direct quotes from the medical
>>doctors who conducted the study. You sure you are reading the results
>>correctly? Or are you saying that you understand their results better
>>then they do?
>>
>
> Snipnrun coward.
>
> teehee!
>
> Jade
>

Especially this part:

"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
for you in Walmart in a few years."

--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?

On Tue, 6 May 2008 00:49:14 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
wrote:

>Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
>news:4cfp0458uugb7g0s9o1quiutphhdrfo2hl@4ax.com :
>
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:04:31 +0000, The Master
>> <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Kenny wrote:
>>>
>>>> You edited out the parts of my post where I...
>>>
>>>sounded like a total bitch cry baby? No, I leave them in.
>>>
>>>> completely invalidated your
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>>Kind of hard to do that, when I have direct quotes from the medical
>>>doctors who conducted the study. You sure you are reading the results
>>>correctly? Or are you saying that you understand their results better
>>>then they do?
>>>
>>
>> Snipnrun coward.
>>
>> teehee!
>>
>> Jade
>>
>
>Especially this part:
>
>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>for you in Walmart in a few years."

Let's see if he snips it again.

Jade

On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>
>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
>>>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
>>>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
>>>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>>>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>
>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>
>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is bitching
>about this time sigh
>
>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>after she lost weight.
>
>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent retreat
>(that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land. She
>is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.

You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
boot.

>
>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>
>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.

Low rent losers come in all sizes.

>
>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>you bragging rights.
>
>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can fit
>in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to Hollywood's
>direct question about what car I drive. The third time is now in
>reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that I some
>how "bragged" about it.

You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.

>
>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>
>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe that
>I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had that job
>while in college.

You have not rebounded from that low point.

>
>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>
>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the sting
>of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>
>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>
>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't need
>a scooter, don't want a scooter.

You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.

>
>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to? laugh
>Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit? Don't
>break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.

You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.

On Wed, 7 May 2008, Jo wrote:

>>>> "You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>> after she lost weight.
>>
>> Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent retreat
>> (that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land. She
>> is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>> bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>> I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>
> You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
> a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
> boot.

She lives in the same state, my home loan is at a lower rate then the one
I had when I was married to her, and I drive far because the the metro
area I work in has built up. The closest "large land" plots were about 45
minutes away, I live only 15 minutes past that.

I'm not sure what BFE means though... If you mean "out in the middle of
no place", yeah. That's why I was able to get the 1.5 acres. Try finding
a track home that offers you that much.

>>>> That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>> you bragging rights.
>>
>> Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>> apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can fit
>> in with ease.
>
> You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.

Reporting that I fit in it properly actually. I've driven a couple
Toyotas, a Mazda, and a Ford. None of them was comfortable to drive. The
Rio, however, was just fine and offered lots of room. Again, as it
relates to the group's charter, "hey people, this car has lots of room!"
If you can't understand that, it's not my fault.

> You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.

You are suffering from delusions of adequacy.

"Jo" <jo@forever.com> wrote in message
news:20080507125610.51DB44E4EB@outpost.zedz.net...
> On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master
<tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
> wrote:
> You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and
drive
> a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan
to
> boot.

Jo the psychic strikes!

> >>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.

Who cares?

> >Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>
> Low rent losers come in all sizes.

Does it make you feel like a winner to call someone else a
loser?

> You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
> >
> >>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
> >
> >That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I
believe that
> >I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had
that job
> >while in college.
>
> You have not rebounded from that low point.

Jo the psychic strikes again.

> >Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine.
Don't need
> >a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>
> You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.

Do you expect to need a scooter when you're older?

> >So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply
to? laugh
> >Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit?
Don't
> >break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>
> You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.

Why do you take Jade so seriously?

Robin

On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:

>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>wrote:
>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>
>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
>>>>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
>>>>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
>>>>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>>>>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>
>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>
>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is bitching
>>about this time sigh
>>
>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>after she lost weight.
>>
>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent retreat
>>(that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land. She
>>is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>>bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>>I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>
>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
>a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
>boot.
>
>>
>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>
>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>
>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>
>>
>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>you bragging rights.
>>
>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can fit
>>in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to Hollywood's
>>direct question about what car I drive. The third time is now in
>>reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that I some
>>how "bragged" about it.
>
>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>
>>
>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>
>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe that
>>I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had that job
>>while in college.
>
>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>
>>
>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>
>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the sting
>>of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>
>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>
>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't need
>>a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>
>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>
>>
>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to? laugh
>>Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit? Don't
>>break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>
>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>
>
Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
couldn't.

You faulted him for being economic with his money. I bet you have your
shirts imported and you drive a SUV. Gas hogged idiot.

You call him a loser but he has his smarts where they belong and you
sit on yours.

You have a problem and should not be seen in public without a keeper.

LV

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not
change the subject."

---Winston Churchill
----------------------------------------------

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigfoot.com> wrote in
newsph4249601n5384oejvs6ukr2jbktchen4@4ax.com:

> On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>wrote:
>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after
>>>>>she lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That
>>>>>is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you
>>>>>bragging rights. That is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That
>>>>>is why you are morbidly obese. Fortunately for you, there should be
>>>>>an electric scooter waiting for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>
>>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>>
>>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is
>>>bitching about this time sigh
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>>after she lost weight.
>>>
>>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent
>>>retreat (that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres
>>>of land. She is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's
>>>baby, in a 2 bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up.
>>>I don't think I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>>
>>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and
>>drive a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime
>>loan to boot.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>>
>>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>>
>>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>>you bragging rights.
>>>
>>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can
>>>fit in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to
>>>Hollywood's direct question about what car I drive. The third time is
>>>now in reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that
>>>I some how "bragged" about it.
>>
>>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>>
>>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe
>>>that I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had
>>>that job while in college.
>>
>>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>>
>>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the
>>>sting of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>>
>>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>
>>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't
>>>need a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>>
>>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>>
>>>
>>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to?
>>>laugh Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their
>>>shit? Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>>
>>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>>
>>
> Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
> environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
> stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
> couldn't.
>
> You faulted him for being economic with his money. I bet you have your
> shirts imported

Yes.

> and you drive a SUV.

No

> Gas hogged idiot.

That's you after a serve of refried beans.

>
> You call him a loser but he has his smarts where they belong and you
> sit on yours.
>
> You have a problem and should not be seen in public without a keeper.
>
> LV
>
> "I rode a tank and held a general's rank
> When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
>
> ---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
> --------------------------------------------
> "A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not
> change the subject."
>
> ---Winston Churchill
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.usenet.com
>



--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?

"Lady Veteran" <armyvet@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
newsph4249601n5384oejvs6ukr2jbktchen4@4ax.com...
> On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>wrote:
>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after
>>>>>she
>>>>>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why
>>>>>you
>>>>>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights.
>>>>>That
>>>>>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>>>>>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter
>>>>>waiting
>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>
>>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>>
>>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is bitching
>>>about this time sigh
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>>after she lost weight.
>>>
>>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent
>>>retreat
>>>(that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land.
>>>She
>>>is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>>>bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>>>I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>>
>>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
>>a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
>>boot.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>>
>>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>>
>>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>>you bragging rights.
>>>
>>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can
>>>fit
>>>in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to Hollywood's
>>>direct question about what car I drive. The third time is now in
>>>reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that I some
>>>how "bragged" about it.
>>
>>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>>
>>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe
>>>that
>>>I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had that
>>>job
>>>while in college.
>>
>>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>>
>>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the sting
>>>of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>>
>>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>
>>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't
>>>need
>>>a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>>
>>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>>
>>>
>>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to?
>>>laugh
>>>Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit?
>>>Don't
>>>break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>>
>>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>>
>>
> Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
> environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
> stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
> couldn't.
>
> You faulted him for being economic with his money. I bet you have your
> shirts imported and you drive a SUV. Gas hogged idiot.
>
> You call him a loser but he has his smarts where they belong and you
> sit on yours.
>
> You have a problem and should not be seen in public without a keeper.
>
> LV

You have a problem because you are phat and ugly.

On Thu, 8 May 2008 00:59:10 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
wrote:

>Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigfoot.com> wrote in
>newsph4249601n5384oejvs6ukr2jbktchen4@4ax.com :
>
>> On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after
>>>>>>she lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That
>>>>>>is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you
>>>>>>bragging rights. That is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That
>>>>>>is why you are morbidly obese. Fortunately for you, there should be
>>>>>>an electric scooter waiting for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>>
>>>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>>>
>>>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is
>>>>bitching about this time sigh
>>>>
>>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>>>after she lost weight.
>>>>
>>>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent
>>>>retreat (that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres
>>>>of land. She is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's
>>>>baby, in a 2 bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up.
>>>>I don't think I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>>>
>>>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and
>>>drive a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime
>>>loan to boot.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>>>
>>>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>>>
>>>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>>>you bragging rights.
>>>>
>>>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can
>>>>fit in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to
>>>>Hollywood's direct question about what car I drive. The third time is
>>>>now in reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that
>>>>I some how "bragged" about it.
>>>
>>>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>>>
>>>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe
>>>>that I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had
>>>>that job while in college.
>>>
>>>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>>>
>>>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the
>>>>sting of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>>>
>>>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>
>>>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't
>>>>need a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>>>
>>>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to?
>>>>laugh Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their
>>>>shit? Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>>>
>>>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
>> environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
>> stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
>> couldn't.
>>
>> You faulted him for being economic with his money. I bet you have your
>> shirts imported
>
>Yes.
>
>> and you drive a SUV.
>
>No
>
>> Gas hogged idiot.
>
>That's you after a serve of refried beans.

lol!

Jade

On Wed, 07 May 2008 19:23:12 -0500, Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>wrote:
>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after she
>>>>>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why you
>>>>>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights. That
>>>>>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>>>>>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>
>>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>>
>>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is bitching
>>>about this time sigh
>>>
>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>>after she lost weight.
>>>
>>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent retreat
>>>(that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land. She
>>>is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>>>bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>>>I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>>
>>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
>>a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
>>boot.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>>
>>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>>
>>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>>you bragging rights.
>>>
>>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can fit
>>>in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to Hollywood's
>>>direct question about what car I drive. The third time is now in
>>>reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that I some
>>>how "bragged" about it.
>>
>>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>>
>>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe that
>>>I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had that job
>>>while in college.
>>
>>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>>
>>>
>>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>>
>>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the sting
>>>of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>>
>>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>
>>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't need
>>>a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>>
>>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>>
>>>
>>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to? laugh
>>>Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit? Don't
>>>break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>>
>>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>>
>>
>Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
>environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
>stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
>couldn't.
>

Bobbi is a fan of the Master.

>You faulted him for being economic with his money.

Uh...lol! (hint: everyone is "economic" with their money)

Jade

On Wed, 7 May 2008 20:44:49 -0700, "Anthony X"
<insurancefraud@asb-comm-logicx.net> wrote:

>
>"Lady Veteran" <armyvet@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
>newsph4249601n5384oejvs6ukr2jbktchen4@4ax.com.. .
>> On 7 May 2008 12:56:11 -0000, jo@forever.com (Jo) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 6 May 2008, Daedalus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you after
>>>>>>she
>>>>>>lost weight. That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart. That is why
>>>>>>you
>>>>>>believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives you bragging rights.
>>>>>>That
>>>>>>is why you used to work at Radio Shack. That is why you are morbidly
>>>>>>obese. Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter
>>>>>>waiting
>>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>>
>>>>>Let's see if he snips it again.
>>>>
>>>>Do the trolls lives really revolve around me? I'd be so honored if I
>>>>wasn't so disturbed by it... Ok, so let's see what the troll is bitching
>>>>about this time sigh
>>>>
>>>>>>"You are a failure, TM. That is why your former wife left you
>>>>>>after she lost weight.
>>>>
>>>>Already addressed this in the past. I own a 3 bedroom plus parent
>>>>retreat
>>>>(that can be converted into a 4th bedroom) house on 1.5 acres of land.
>>>>She
>>>>is pregnant with her live-in security guard boy friend's baby, in a 2
>>>>bedroom apartment. She traded skinny, but in no way up. I don't think
>>>>I'm a failure, I think it's funny as hell.
>>>
>>>You live in a state with low real estate prices, you live in BFE and drive
>>>a considerable distance to work. You probably have a subprime loan to
>>>boot.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you buy your shirts at Walmart.
>>>>
>>>>Lots of people buy clothes at Walmart. Fat and skinny alike.
>>>
>>>Low rent losers come in all sizes.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you believe that buying a 3 year old Kia Rio gives
>>>>>>you bragging rights.
>>>>
>>>>Bragging rights? Lets see, the first time I mentioned it, I did so as
>>>>apart of this group's charter, saying that it's a small car that I can
>>>>fit
>>>>in with ease. The second time I mentioned it was in reply to Hollywood's
>>>>direct question about what car I drive. The third time is now in
>>>>reference to a troll's bitching about it, thinking in error that I some
>>>>how "bragged" about it.
>>>
>>>You seemed very proud when you announced your purchase.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you used to work at Radio Shack.
>>>>
>>>>That one I conversationally call the low point of my life. I believe
>>>>that
>>>>I even called it that when I mentioned it. For the record, I had that
>>>>job
>>>>while in college.
>>>
>>>You have not rebounded from that low point.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>That is why you are morbidly obese.
>>>>
>>>>LOL! "Take that, fat man! HAHAHA, I called you fat, now feel the sting
>>>>of my remark" LV's famous "brain stem" comment anyone? yawn
>>>>
>>>>>>Fortunately for you, there should be an electric scooter waiting
>>>>>>for you in Walmart in a few years."
>>>>
>>>>Why would I need one? Like I said, I can walk perfectly fine. Don't
>>>>need
>>>>a scooter, don't want a scooter.
>>>
>>>You're 35 years old. Give it a few years.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>So, that was the comment Jade and her friends wanted me to reply to?
>>>>laugh
>>>>Is it any wonder why I don't bother replying to most of their shit?
>>>>Don't
>>>>break your arm patting yourself on the back over this one.
>>>
>>>You snip the parts where you are smacked down. Loser.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, let's see, brain stem. This man drives a car that is
>> environmentally correct and can fit behind the well after your fellow
>> stupids said that fat people in general and him in particular said he
>> couldn't.
>>
>> You faulted him for being economic with his money. I bet you have your
>> shirts imported and you drive a SUV. Gas hogged idiot.
>>
>> You call him a loser but he has his smarts where they belong and you
>> sit on yours.
>>
>> You have a problem and should not be seen in public without a keeper.
>>
>> LV
>
>You have a problem because you are phat and ugly.
>
You have a problem becuase you are ugly inside and out. Come back when
you know what you are talking about.

LV

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not
change the subject."

---Winston Churchill
----------------------------------------------

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com