Homosexuals

Look, I have nothing against gay people. I understand that around 10% of the
population is gay. As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why
do gays prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
to stats one of you is gay. Which one?

Charles
Lee Michaels
Cohen
Om
Pete
Cattleboy
Shute
Dally
Henry
DZ

So, which one??

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:

> Look, I have nothing against gay people.

Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.

> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.

Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to San
Fransisco.

> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according to
> stats one of you is gay. Which one?

> Charles
> Lee Michaels
> Cohen
> Om
> Pete
> Cattleboy
> Shute
> Dally
> Henry
> DZ

> So, which one??

Hmmm.
I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
other regulars are straight.

BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!

----
Pete

P.S. its Bully...

"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>
>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>
> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>
>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>
> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
> San Fransisco.
>
>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according to
>> stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>
>> Charles
>> Lee Michaels
>> Cohen
>> Om
>> Pete
>> Cattleboy
>> Shute
>> Dally
>> Henry
>> DZ
>
>> So, which one??
>
> Hmmm.
> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
> other regulars are straight.

Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
you'll recall.

Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.

David

In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

> Hmmm.
> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
> other regulars are straight.
>
> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!

<rofl>

>
> ----
> Pete

One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> schreef:

>>> So, which one??

>> Hmmm.
>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>> other regulars are straight.

> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
> you'll recall.

Sure.
I remember that Lyle even said he had "evidence" that i was gay.

Havent heard that expression for a while, BTW...
I remember that Billy Chambless said it to Andrulla whe she posted here a
few times.

She was pretty fucking pissed...

> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.

Kinky...

----
Pete

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> schreef:

>> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!

> One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....

Well...

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils...y_is_a_sin.htm

----
Pete

In article <453e0714$0$56769$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> schreef:
>
> >> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>
> > One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
>
> Well...
>
> http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils...exuality_is_a_
> sin.htm
>
> ----
> Pete

Scary...

Probably a Caucasian supremacist...
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Pete wrote:
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>
>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>
> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>
>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>
> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket
> to San Fransisco.
>
>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
>> prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
>> their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people -
>> according to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>
>> Charles
>> Lee Michaels
>> Cohen
>> Om
>> Pete
>> Cattleboy
>> Shute
>> Dally
>> Henry
>> DZ
>
>> So, which one??
>
> Hmmm.
> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all
> the other regulars are straight.
>
> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>
> ----
> Pete
>
> P.S. its Bully...

Gay as a newly-shaved lamb, I am !!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
newsmp_omelet-0801B4.07164224102006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm.
>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>> other regulars are straight.
>>
>> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>
> <rofl>

yes that was kind of amusing!
>
>>
>> ----
>> Pete
>
> One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....

Now Om, some things are too obvious
(BTW Om . . . .something about you ,. . . . .. it couldn't be . . .. ah
no , . .. it was just a passing thought with no basis in fact,. . . . well
.. . . perish the thought but you do make souffle right?? . . . .)

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove _ to validate e-mails.
>
> "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack
> Nicholson

In article <453e0973$0$11968$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
> newsmp_omelet-0801B4.07164224102006@news.giganews.com...
> > In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
> > "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> Hmmm.
> >> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> >> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
> >> other regulars are straight.
> >>
> >> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
> >
> > <rofl>
>
> yes that was kind of amusing!
> >
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Pete
> >
> > One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
>
> Now Om, some things are too obvious
> (BTW Om . . . .something about you ,. . . . .. it couldn't be . . .. ah
> no , . .. it was just a passing thought with no basis in fact,. . . . well
> . . . perish the thought but you do make souffle right?? . . . .)
>

Pray tell, what gender are some of the most famous chefs in the world?
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:uun%g.12193$Lv3.8168@newsread1.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>>
>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>>
>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>>
>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>>
>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
>> San Fransisco.
>>
>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
>>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>>> to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>>
>>> Charles
>>> Lee Michaels
>>> Cohen
>>> Om
>>> Pete
>>> Cattleboy
>>> Shute
>>> Dally
>>> Henry
>>> DZ
>>
>>> So, which one??
>>
>> Hmmm.
>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>> other regulars are straight.
>
> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
> you'll recall.

Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)

>
> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.

Thing is that it is *consensual* - kangaroo always hangs around doesn't she?


>
> David
>

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
newsmp_omelet-84B778.07420124102006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <453e0973$0$11968$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> newsmp_omelet-0801B4.07164224102006@news.giganews.com...
>> > In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
>> > "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hmmm.
>> >> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>> >> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all
>> >> the
>> >> other regulars are straight.
>> >>
>> >> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>> >
>> > <rofl>
>>
>> yes that was kind of amusing!
>> >
>> >>
>> >> ----
>> >> Pete
>> >
>> > One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
>>
>> Now Om, some things are too obvious
>> (BTW Om . . . .something about you ,. . . . .. it couldn't be . . ..
>> ah
>> no , . .. it was just a passing thought with no basis in fact,. . . .
>> well
>> . . . perish the thought but you do make souffle right?? . . . .)
>>
>
> Pray tell, what gender are some of the most famous chefs in the world?

True . . . but I wonder what % of male apron boys are gay as fuck?

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove _ to validate e-mails.
>
> "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack
> Nicholson

"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl...
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>
>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>
> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.

Well . . . I don't about *absolutely* nothing . . .

>
>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>
> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
> San Fransisco.

that's not unlike ethnic cleansing?

>
>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according to
>> stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>
>> Charles
>> Lee Michaels
>> Cohen
>> Om
>> Pete
>> Cattleboy
>> Shute
>> Dally
>> Henry
>> DZ
>
>> So, which one??
>
> Hmmm.
> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...

OK, I know I forgot Curt - he will never forgive me!

> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
> other regulars are straight.
>
> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!

very fucking funny!
>
> ----
> Pete
>
> P.S. its Bully...
>

In article <453e0bb4$0$29329$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
> newsmp_omelet-84B778.07420124102006@news.giganews.com...
> > In article <453e0973$0$11968$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
> > "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> newsmp_omelet-0801B4.07164224102006@news.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
> >> > "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hmmm.
> >> >> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> >> >> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all
> >> >> the
> >> >> other regulars are straight.
> >> >>
> >> >> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
> >> >
> >> > <rofl>
> >>
> >> yes that was kind of amusing!
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> ----
> >> >> Pete
> >> >
> >> > One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
> >>
> >> Now Om, some things are too obvious
> >> (BTW Om . . . .something about you ,. . . . .. it couldn't be . . ..
> >> ah
> >> no , . .. it was just a passing thought with no basis in fact,. . . .
> >> well
> >> . . . perish the thought but you do make souffle right?? . . . .)
> >>
> >
> > Pray tell, what gender are some of the most famous chefs in the world?
>
> True . . . but I wonder what % of male apron boys are gay as fuck?
>

If I was a Catholic priest......

<inserts joke>

Two priests are in a Vatican bathroom using the urinals.
One of them looks at the other one's penis and notices
there's a "Nicoderm" patch on it. *He looks at the other
priest and says, "I believe you're supposed to put that
patch on your arm or shoulder, not your penis."

The other one replies, "It's working just fine. *I'm down
to two butts a day."
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
newsmp_omelet-211C05.07544624102006@news.giganews.com...
> In article <453e0bb4$0$29329$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> newsmp_omelet-84B778.07420124102006@news.giganews.com...
>> > In article <453e0973$0$11968$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> ,
>> > "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> newsmp_omelet-0801B4.07164224102006@news.giganews.com...
>> >> > In article <453dffc8$0$51339$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
>> >> > "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hmmm.
>> >> >> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>> >> >> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> other regulars are straight.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>> >> >
>> >> > <rofl>
>> >>
>> >> yes that was kind of amusing!
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ----
>> >> >> Pete
>> >> >
>> >> > One wonders why David did not include his own name there.....
>> >>
>> >> Now Om, some things are too obvious
>> >> (BTW Om . . . .something about you ,. . . . .. it couldn't be . . ..
>> >> ah
>> >> no , . .. it was just a passing thought with no basis in fact,. . . .
>> >> well
>> >> . . . perish the thought but you do make souffle right?? . . . .)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Pray tell, what gender are some of the most famous chefs in the world?
>>
>> True . . . but I wonder what % of male apron boys are gay as fuck?
>>
>
> If I was a Catholic priest......
>
> <inserts joke>
>
> Two priests are in a Vatican bathroom using the urinals.
> One of them looks at the other one's penis and notices
> there's a "Nicoderm" patch on it. He looks at the other
> priest and says, "I believe you're supposed to put that
> patch on your arm or shoulder, not your penis."
>
> The other one replies, "It's working just fine. I'm down
> to two butts a day."
> --

ha ha! Good one!

> Peace, Om
>
> Remove _ to validate e-mails.
>
> "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack
> Nicholson

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote
>> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
>>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>>>
>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>>>
>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>>>
>>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>>>
>>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
>>> San Fransisco.
>>>
>>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
>>>> prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
>>>> their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people -
>>>> according to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>>>
>>>> Charles
>>>> Lee Michaels
>>>> Cohen
>>>> Om
>>>> Pete
>>>> Cattleboy
>>>> Shute
>>>> Dally
>>>> Henry
>>>> DZ
>>>
>>>> So, which one??
>>>
>>> Hmmm.
>>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>>> other regulars are straight.
>>
>> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
>> you'll recall.
>
> Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
> who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)


Good thing I'm in a profession that is well known for it's manly, macho,
heterosexual men.


>> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.
>
> Thing is that it is *consensual* - kangaroo always hangs around doesn't
> she?


Marsupial sluts!

David

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:G9o%g.12202$Lv3.2718@newsread1.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote

[.......]

>>
>> Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that
>> people who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . ..
>> 'different'!)
>
>
> Good thing I'm in a profession that is well known for it's manly, macho,
> heterosexual men.

funny that but I've been around hospitals (my wife was an RN) and the male
nurses that I've met without exception were big muscular guys who I would
not want to tangle with

>
>
>>> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.
>>
>> Thing is that it is *consensual* - kangaroo always hangs around doesn't
>> she?
>
>
> Marsupial sluts!

yeah great . . . now you have cast a slur on a whole species. are you proud
of yourself??

>
> David
>

In article <G9o%g.12202$Lv3.2718@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> > "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote
> >> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
> >>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
> >>>
> >>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
> >>>
> >>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
> >>>
> >>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
> >>>
> >>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
> >>> San Fransisco.
> >>>
> >>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
> >>>> prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
> >>>> their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people -
> >>>> according to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
> >>>
> >>>> Charles
> >>>> Lee Michaels
> >>>> Cohen
> >>>> Om
> >>>> Pete
> >>>> Cattleboy
> >>>> Shute
> >>>> Dally
> >>>> Henry
> >>>> DZ
> >>>
> >>>> So, which one??
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm.
> >>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
> >>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
> >>> other regulars are straight.
> >>
> >> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
> >> you'll recall.
> >
> > Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
> > who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)
>
>
> Good thing I'm in a profession that is well known for it's manly, macho,
> heterosexual men.
>

<cough>

Glad I'd put the hot Earl Gray's tea down......
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:44:40 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:uun%g.12193$Lv3.8168@newsread1.news.pas.eart hlink.net...
>>
>> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
>>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>>>
>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>>>
>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>>>
>>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>>>
>>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
>>> San Fransisco.
>>>
>>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
>>>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>>>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>>>> to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>>>
>>>> Charles
>>>> Lee Michaels
>>>> Cohen
>>>> Om
>>>> Pete
>>>> Cattleboy
>>>> Shute
>>>> Dally
>>>> Henry
>>>> DZ
>>>
>>>> So, which one??
>>>
>>> Hmmm.
>>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>>> other regulars are straight.
>>
>> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
>> you'll recall.
>
>Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
>who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)

You promised not to tell you rotten bugger; that's the last time I
slip you a crippler - I'm going back to girls. (You never, ever
brought me to a climax, so up yours from SW1.)

Anyway, as Cohen so rightly reminded us, we're all as gay as fuck at
MFW! ;o)

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:qp5sj21s2oi4oddeph8sob6u0b0pkrg03l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:44:40 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>news:uun%g.12193$Lv3.8168@newsread1.news.pas.ear thlink.net...
>>>
>>> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
>>>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>>>>
>>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>>>>
>>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>>>>
>>>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>>>>
>>>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket
>>>> to
>>>> San Fransisco.
>>>>
>>>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
>>>>> prefer
>>>>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>>>>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>>>>> to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>>>>
>>>>> Charles
>>>>> Lee Michaels
>>>>> Cohen
>>>>> Om
>>>>> Pete
>>>>> Cattleboy
>>>>> Shute
>>>>> Dally
>>>>> Henry
>>>>> DZ
>>>>
>>>>> So, which one??
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm.
>>>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>>>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>>>> other regulars are straight.
>>>
>>> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
>>> you'll recall.
>>
>>Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
>>who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)
>
> You promised not to tell you rotten bugger; that's the last time I
> slip you a crippler - I'm going back to girls. (You never, ever
> brought me to a climax, so up yours from SW1.)

Well you certainly did a good job of faking it then . . . you were always a
slut anyway .. , (I thought you said you 'tried' girls once but you
couldn't find their penis so you gave up??)
'

>
> Anyway, as Cohen so rightly reminded us, we're all as gay as fuck at
> MFW! ;o)

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:41:30 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>Look, I have nothing against gay people. I understand that around 10% of the
>population is gay. As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why
>do gays prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
>their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>
>Charles
>Lee Michaels
>Cohen
>Om
>Pete
>Cattleboy
>Shute
>Dally
>Henry
>DZ
>
>So, which one??

Henry would be my starter for ten! ;o)

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:48:36 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:qp5sj21s2oi4oddeph8sob6u0b0pkrg03l@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:44:40 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>>>news:uun%g.12193$Lv3.8168@newsread1.news.pas.ea rthlink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote
>>>>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>>>>>
>>>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket
>>>>> to
>>>>> San Fransisco.
>>>>>
>>>>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>>>>>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>>>>>> to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>> Lee Michaels
>>>>>> Cohen
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>> Cattleboy
>>>>>> Shute
>>>>>> Dally
>>>>>> Henry
>>>>>> DZ
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, which one??
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm.
>>>>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>>>>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>>>>> other regulars are straight.
>>>>
>>>> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
>>>> you'll recall.
>>>
>>>Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
>>>who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)
>>
>> You promised not to tell you rotten bugger; that's the last time I
>> slip you a crippler - I'm going back to girls. (You never, ever
>> brought me to a climax, so up yours from SW1.)
>
>Well you certainly did a good job of faking it then . . . you were always a
>slut anyway .. , (I thought you said you 'tried' girls once but you
>couldn't find their penis so you gave up??)

I didn't give up, I said I was looking into it! ;o)

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> schreef:

>>> Pete, we are all "Gay As Fuck", and have been for a number of years, if
>>> you'll recall.

>>Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that people
>>who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . .. 'different'!)

> You promised not to tell you rotten bugger; that's the last time I
> slip you a crippler - I'm going back to girls. (You never, ever
> brought me to a climax, so up yours from SW1.)

> Anyway, as Cohen so rightly reminded us, we're all as gay as fuck at
> MFW! ;o)

High androgen levels sure as hell had that effect on me!

After a few years on steroids, i noticed i had this deep, DEEP urge to dress
up in leather, let my moustache grow and all that stuff. And i developed
this affinity for short, slim, feminine looking guys.

So i guess i am gay in a "Freddy Mercury kinda way"!

But...there is no way i top Freddy, of course. That would be arrogant,

Freddy was the UberGay, and will always be remembered as such.
If usenet availeble in the here-after, he sure as hell would be reading our
ON TOPIC posts!

----
Pete

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:

>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.

>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.

> Well . . . I don't about *absolutely* nothing . . .

A certain % of gay men are... bodybuilders. No really, they are.

>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.

>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
>> San Fransisco.

> that's not unlike ethnic cleansing?

Homosexuals first, Mulsims second. The black guys can stay.

>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays prefer
>>> to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of their
>>> sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people - according
>>> to stats one of you is gay. Which one?

>>> Charles
>>> Lee Michaels
>>> Cohen
>>> Om
>>> Pete
>>> Cattleboy
>>> Shute
>>> Dally
>>> Henry
>>> DZ

>>> So, which one??

>> Hmmm.
>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...

> OK, I know I forgot Curt - he will never forgive me!

I would be pretty fucking pissed if i wasnt on the list!

>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>> other regulars are straight.

>> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!

> very fucking funny!

And informative!
Not to mention that each and every time you provide me with an excuse to
spew all my male chauvinist bigot BS!

Which is, of course, only part of me "Cyber Personality"...

In reality, i have a lot of respect for women. I really do.
Who are *WE* to tell them NOT to play in pornographic films?

Or to be prostitutes?

I mean, they can decide that for themselves, cant they ?!?!?!

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote >>
>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote
>
> [.......]
>
>>> Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that
>>> people who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . ..
>>> 'different'!)
>>
>> Good thing I'm in a profession that is well known for it's manly, macho,
>> heterosexual men.
>
> funny that but I've been around hospitals (my wife was an RN) and the male
> nurses that I've met without exception were big muscular guys who I would
> not want to tangle with


The stereotypre was probably true many years ago, but with the massive and
increasing nursing shortage, plus the increasing wages (some of my
colleagues who actually like to work overtime have annual salaries near
$200,000), plus a lot of ex-military corpman types, has changed the
demographic.

>
>>>> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.
>>>
>>> Thing is that it is *consensual* - kangaroo always hangs around doesn't
>>> she?
>>
>> Marsupial sluts!
>
> yeah great . . . now you have cast a slur on a whole species. are you
> proud of yourself??

It's the 'roos I have experience with.

David

David wrote:
> "Pete" wrote
[...]

> > Hmmm.
> > I wonder why certain people are in that list and others
> > are not...

Classic diversion strategy on David's part? ;o)

> OK, I know I forgot Curt - he will never forgive me!

There goes YOUR blowjob, pal.

--
Curt

"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:453e26ed$0$92785$dbd43001@news.wanadoo.nl...
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>
>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>
>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>
>> Well . . . I don't about *absolutely* nothing . . .
>
> A certain % of gay men are... bodybuilders. No really, they are.
>
http://www.catholiceducation.org/art...ty/ho0039.html

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:zUq%g.14448$Y24.5566@newsread4.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote >>
>>> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote
>>
>> [.......]
>>
>>>> Well I just had a hunch - maybe Charles ?? (I heard somewhere that
>>>> people who had a fascination with weekends could be . .. uh . ..
>>>> 'different'!)
>>>
>>> Good thing I'm in a profession that is well known for it's manly, macho,
>>> heterosexual men.
>>
>> funny that but I've been around hospitals (my wife was an RN) and the
>> male nurses that I've met without exception were big muscular guys who I
>> would not want to tangle with
>
>
> The stereotypre was probably true many years ago, but with the massive and
> increasing nursing shortage, plus the increasing wages (some of my
> colleagues who actually like to work overtime have annual salaries near
> $200,000), plus a lot of ex-military corpman types, has changed the
> demographic.
>
>>
>>>>> Except for a certain Down Under Kangaroo Fucker, who likes girl 'roos.
>>>>
>>>> Thing is that it is *consensual* - kangaroo always hangs around doesn't
>>>> she?
>>>
>>> Marsupial sluts!
>>
>> yeah great . . . now you have cast a slur on a whole species. are you
>> proud of yourself??
>
> It's the 'roos I have experience with.

They say once you have experienced a 'roo, you would never go back to your
everyday wallabie

>
> David
>

"Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:453e26ed$0$92785$dbd43001@news.wanadoo.nl...
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:
>
>>>> Look, I have nothing against gay people.
>
>>> Me neither. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being gay.
>
>> Well . . . I don't about *absolutely* nothing . . .
>
> A certain % of gay men are... bodybuilders. No really, they are.
>
>>>> I understand that around 10% of the population is gay.
>
>>> Not here. 1% at most. And when we find out, they get a one way ticket to
>>> San Fransisco.
>
>> that's not unlike ethnic cleansing?
>
> Homosexuals first, Mulsims second. The black guys can stay.
>
>>>> As 10% is a significant percentage of the population, why do gays
>>>> prefer to be 'in the closet'? They have no reason to be ashamed of
>>>> their sexuality. So who is gay in this group? Here are 10 people -
>>>> according to stats one of you is gay. Which one?
>
>>>> Charles
>>>> Lee Michaels
>>>> Cohen
>>>> Om
>>>> Pete
>>>> Cattleboy
>>>> Shute
>>>> Dally
>>>> Henry
>>>> DZ
>
>>>> So, which one??
>
>>> Hmmm.
>>> I wonder why certain people are in that list and others are not...
>
>> OK, I know I forgot Curt - he will never forgive me!
>
> I would be pretty fucking pissed if i wasnt on the list!
>
>>> Anyway, according to the stats, that entire list can be gay. If all the
>>> other regulars are straight.
>
>>> BTW, i like these on topic posts Good Job!
>
>> very fucking funny!
>
> And informative!
> Not to mention that each and every time you provide me with an excuse to
> spew all my male chauvinist bigot BS!
>
> Which is, of course, only part of me "Cyber Personality"...
>
> In reality, i have a lot of respect for women. I really do.
> Who are *WE* to tell them NOT to play in pornographic films?
>
> Or to be prostitutes?
>
> I mean, they can decide that for themselves, cant they ?!?!?!
Yes, that goes without saying. And if they insist on doing the laundry and
cleaning etc who are we do discourage them?

>

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> schreef:

>> In reality, i have a lot of respect for women. I really do.
>> Who are *WE* to tell them NOT to play in pornographic films?

>> Or to be prostitutes?

>> I mean, they can decide that for themselves, cant they ?!?!?!

> Yes, that goes without saying. And if they insist on doing the laundry and
> cleaning etc who are we do discourage them?

Exactly!

And most women like to cook as well. And they are not exactly great
thinkers.
Those who are probably have a surplus of testosterone. Very unnatural.

I also think its better if they stayed away from the gym, and should get
huge the nature intended them to.

By getting pregnant.

----
Pete