<!-- google_ad_section_start -->HST -- Did I Understand This?<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Fitness and Nutrition > Fitness > misc.fitness.weights

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
xmp333@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default HST -- Did I Understand This?

Hi All,


I've been digging around to make sure I understand the HST principles,
and I think I got it. However, I would like to put it in my own words
to make sure I'm on the mark. Please let me know if I'm wrong, and if
so, what I've gotten wrong. Thanks in advance.

Assuming I start this on a Monday:

1. Spend Monday figuring out what my 15 Rep Max is for each exercise.
2. Spend Wednesday figuring out what my 10 Rep Max is for each
exercise.
3. Spend Friday figuring out what my 5 Rep Max is for each exercise

4. No resistance training for 9-14 days.

5. Start a two week block with 1 set of 15 Reps for each exercise,
increasing the weight each workout so that the last workout is with the
weight on my 15 Rep max.

6. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 10 Rep max.

7. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 5 Rep max.

8. Start a two week block training to failure. This can be with a
weight greater than my 5 Rep Max, or with multiple sets of 5 Reps.

9. Repeat from Step 1.


Thanks again.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
Andrzej Rosa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

Dnia 2006-11-16 xmp333@yahoo.com napisał(a):
> Hi All,
>
>
> I've been digging around to make sure I understand the HST principles,


It's three days a week full body workout. You cycle the stimulus by
starting light and gradually increasing weight. By doing this you
change the focus of your workouts, which helps in avoiding stagnation.
Every consecutive stage also starts light and intensity increases as
you go. After ridiculously high intensity period you need a week off.

It also contains plenty of absolutely unnecessary mathematical
mumbo-jumbo, percentages, RMs and all that. Everyone is different,
every time of year is different, every workout is different.

> and I think I got it. However, I would like to put it in my own words
> to make sure I'm on the mark. Please let me know if I'm wrong, and if
> so, what I've gotten wrong. Thanks in advance.
>
> Assuming I start this on a Monday:
>
> 1. Spend Monday figuring out what my 15 Rep Max is for each exercise.
> 2. Spend Wednesday figuring out what my 10 Rep Max is for each
> exercise.
> 3. Spend Friday figuring out what my 5 Rep Max is for each exercise
>
> 4. No resistance training for 9-14 days.


Even if HST advocates it, it's stupid. You do not need 9-14 days of
recovery from one week of "figuring out".

> 5. Start a two week block with 1 set of 15 Reps for each exercise,
> increasing the weight each workout so that the last workout is with the
> weight on my 15 Rep max.
>
> 6. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 10 Rep max.
>
> 7. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 5 Rep max.


It makes sense here. If I wanted to do something HST-like, I'd stop
here and start over with stage 5. By this time you should know pretty
well what are your respective rep maxes.

> 8. Start a two week block training to failure. This can be with a
> weight greater than my 5 Rep Max, or with multiple sets of 5 Reps.


Don't they advocate going with negatives for every exercise any more?
They used to, iirc.

> 9. Repeat from Step 1.


I'm not sure if I get it. I do not understand why two weeks of
training to failure makes 9-14 days rest necessary. When I glanced at
HST it was necessary, because they used to increase weight every
workout and you ended up doing plenty of negatives for every exercise
(which is damn crazy), so there was not much choice. Maybe they
dropped it, but then why do they still advocate such a long rest period?
You shouldn't need that much. Maybe a week, but I'd go by feel.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
xmp333@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

Andrzej Rosa wrote:
[...]
> It's three days a week full body workout. You cycle the stimulus by
> starting light and gradually increasing weight. By doing this you
> change the focus of your workouts, which helps in avoiding stagnation.
> Every consecutive stage also starts light and intensity increases as
> you go. After ridiculously high intensity period you need a week off.


Yes, that's what I got. The idea being to shock the body into growth
by shifting things around so it can't adapt.


> It also contains plenty of absolutely unnecessary mathematical
> mumbo-jumbo, percentages, RMs and all that. Everyone is different,
> every time of year is different, every workout is different.


True. I'm guessing they wanted to explain it in the most general case
which is why it appears more complex than it is. I would have
preferred it if they just took a sample case and worked it out from
beginning to end.


> > 4. No resistance training for 9-14 days.

>
> Even if HST advocates it, it's stupid. You do not need 9-14 days of
> recovery from one week of "figuring out".


The duration seems excessive as well, but if I knew so much about
working out, I wouldn't be following an outlined plan . In my case,
the figuring out is a workout in itself; I have to do at least 15 reps
of each exercise. My normal workout is 2 sets of 12 reps, with the
first set being a warmup.


> > 5. Start a two week block with 1 set of 15 Reps for each exercise,
> > increasing the weight each workout so that the last workout is with the
> > weight on my 15 Rep max.
> >
> > 6. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 10 Rep max.
> >
> > 7. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 5 Rep max.

>
> It makes sense here. If I wanted to do something HST-like, I'd stop
> here and start over with stage 5. By this time you should know pretty
> well what are your respective rep maxes.


Yes, I imagine that my next cycle of figuring out my maxes should be
easier. At worst, I work with a slight increment to the weight I'm
maxing out at. At best, I stick with that weight (if it's still my
max).



> > 8. Start a two week block training to failure. This can be with a
> > weight greater than my 5 Rep Max, or with multiple sets of 5 Reps.

>
> Don't they advocate going with negatives for every exercise any more?
> They used to, iirc.


The site I used advocated a few possibilities; negatives, drop sets,
and increasing sets to failure. Since I work out alone at home, I
think that leaves me no choice but to increase the weight or number of
sets to failure.



> > 9. Repeat from Step 1.

>
> I'm not sure if I get it. I do not understand why two weeks of
> training to failure makes 9-14 days rest necessary. When I glanced at
> HST it was necessary, because they used to increase weight every
> workout and you ended up doing plenty of negatives for every exercise
> (which is damn crazy), so there was not much choice. Maybe they
> dropped it, but then why do they still advocate such a long rest period?
> You shouldn't need that much. Maybe a week, but I'd go by feel.


Thanks for your input. This rest is definitely the part that has me
the most leery.

BTW, even though I only want hypertrophy on my upper body, I read
someplace that upper body growth is limited by the development of the
rest of the body, so the lower body can't be neglected. Is this true?
I have my HST workout (all dumbbells) planned with 2 lower body
workouts for this reason. If not true, I'd rather nix that and either
shorten the workout or add some extra exercises for my upper body. The
exercises I'm doing are:

Inclined Bench Press
Inclined Flyes
Bent Over Rows
Shoulder Press
Tricep Kickback
Bicep Curls
Hammer Curls
Lunges
Calf Raises
Crunches

I may stick with unweighted crunches until I feel my stomach is
sufficiently flat. I don't want bigger stomach muscles building up
under any fat and making it look like I have a gut


>
> --
> Andrzej Rosa 1127R



Thanks for your informative response, I greatly appreciate it.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
Shute
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

On 15 Nov 2006 16:17:14 -0800, xmp333@yahoo.com wrote:

>1. Spend Monday figuring out what my 15 Rep Max is for each exercise.
>2. Spend Wednesday figuring out what my 10 Rep Max is for each
>exercise.
>3. Spend Friday figuring out what my 5 Rep Max is for each exercise


I just use one of those rep calculators I found on the web:
http://strengthnspeed.com/Powerlifti...Calculator.htm

I think it gets me closer than trial and error. I don't follow the
particular plan you are going for so I can't comment on the rest.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
Shute
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:31:51 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
<bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:

>I'm not sure if I get it. I do not understand why two weeks of
>training to failure makes 9-14 days rest necessary. When I glanced at
>HST it was necessary, because they used to increase weight every
>workout and you ended up doing plenty of negatives for every exercise
>(which is damn crazy), so there was not much choice. Maybe they
>dropped it, but then why do they still advocate such a long rest period?
>You shouldn't need that much. Maybe a week, but I'd go by feel.


I don't follow this particular routine so maybe it is different. But
I thought the rest period was at the start and in between cycles.
Not every two weeks but after you complete your 5,10, and 15 rep sets.
Which in this example given would be 6 weeks. The initial rest
period is to detrain your body from whatever you did before. Not sure
what the rest in between cycles is about.



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
Andrzej Rosa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

Dnia 2006-11-16 xmp333@yahoo.com napisał(a):
> Andrzej Rosa wrote:
> [...]
>> It's three days a week full body workout. You cycle the stimulus by
>> starting light and gradually increasing weight. By doing this you
>> change the focus of your workouts, which helps in avoiding stagnation.
>> Every consecutive stage also starts light and intensity increases as
>> you go. After ridiculously high intensity period you need a week off.

>
> Yes, that's what I got. The idea being to shock the body into growth
> by shifting things around so it can't adapt.


Hypertrophy is a form of adaptation. ;-)

[...]
>> > 4. No resistance training for 9-14 days.

>>
>> Even if HST advocates it, it's stupid. You do not need 9-14 days of
>> recovery from one week of "figuring out".

>
> The duration seems excessive as well, but if I knew so much about
> working out, I wouldn't be following an outlined plan .


You probably got it wrong on this. After you finish full cycle, some
lay off should make sense (but if you need so much, there is something
wrong with the program you are following). I see no reason to start
with detraining. Some trainers advocate it, but I suspect that they
want to be sure, that their program will work, no matter if it's
appropriate or not. After a period of detraining, everything will work
for a while.

> In my case,
> the figuring out is a workout in itself; I have to do at least 15 reps
> of each exercise. My normal workout is 2 sets of 12 reps, with the
> first set being a warmup.


I'd skip the initial lay off. After full cycle it makes some sense.

>> > 5. Start a two week block with 1 set of 15 Reps for each exercise,
>> > increasing the weight each workout so that the last workout is with the
>> > weight on my 15 Rep max.
>> >
>> > 6. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 10 Rep max.
>> >
>> > 7. Same as step 5, but using the weights for the 5 Rep max.

>>
>> It makes sense here. If I wanted to do something HST-like, I'd stop
>> here and start over with stage 5. By this time you should know pretty
>> well what are your respective rep maxes.

>
> Yes, I imagine that my next cycle of figuring out my maxes should be
> easier. At worst, I work with a slight increment to the weight I'm
> maxing out at. At best, I stick with that weight (if it's still my
> max).


I mostly meant that I'd skip training post failure three times per week
on all exercises. It's a surefire recipe for burnout, which helps no
one. HST makes you burn out and then recover. IMO both stages are
unnecessary. It's better to actually make some progress during this
time.

If you really like the idea of extra stimulus once in a while, do it
for one muscle group at a time. This way your system has a chance of
being able to deal with the stress.

>> > 8. Start a two week block training to failure. This can be with a
>> > weight greater than my 5 Rep Max, or with multiple sets of 5 Reps.

>>
>> Don't they advocate going with negatives for every exercise any more?
>> They used to, iirc.

>
> The site I used advocated a few possibilities; negatives, drop sets,
> and increasing sets to failure. Since I work out alone at home, I
> think that leaves me no choice but to increase the weight or number of
> sets to failure.


You'll violate one of the "key factors" of HST (AFAIR), which is
constant weight increases, but you may be able to actually make
progress. ;-)

Do not go crazy with intensity and a period of complete lay off
shouldn't be necessary. Training past failure on all exercises three
times per week is stupid. Staying away from a gym for two weeks is
also stupid. Do not worry about not being able to apply HST down to a
letter.

>> I'm not sure if I get it. I do not understand why two weeks of
>> training to failure makes 9-14 days rest necessary. When I glanced at
>> HST it was necessary, because they used to increase weight every
>> workout and you ended up doing plenty of negatives for every exercise
>> (which is damn crazy), so there was not much choice. Maybe they
>> dropped it, but then why do they still advocate such a long rest period?
>> You shouldn't need that much. Maybe a week, but I'd go by feel.

>
> Thanks for your input. This rest is definitely the part that has me
> the most leery.


If you would do what they advocate, you'd need it. At least a week,
but quite possibly more than that.

> BTW, even though I only want hypertrophy on my upper body, I read
> someplace that upper body growth is limited by the development of the
> rest of the body,


Look at boxers. They have sticks for legs and plenty of upper body mass.
You can develop only your forearms, if you like a Popeye look, if you
wish.

> so the lower body can't be neglected. Is this true?


I don't buy it.

> I have my HST workout (all dumbbells) planned with 2 lower body
> workouts for this reason. If not true, I'd rather nix that and either
> shorten the workout or add some extra exercises for my upper body.


You can do that.

> The
> exercises I'm doing are:
>
> Inclined Bench Press
> Inclined Flyes
> Bent Over Rows
> Shoulder Press
> Tricep Kickback
> Bicep Curls
> Hammer Curls
> Lunges
> Calf Raises
> Crunches


Rotate the order of push and pull exercises. You may think that
pulling is not important, but it's because you do not see your back much.
Others do see it. Besides, when your scapular retractors are stronger
your pecs will look twice bigger. It's magic, but it's true (well, not
magic, but proper posture works like that). I'd drop flyes and replace
them with another kind of row. I'd also start some workouts with pulls
and others with pushes to make sure that I put equal emphasise on both
sides of shoulder girdle. Triceps kickbacks are worthless. Replace
them with laying triceps extensions or french presses.

> I may stick with unweighted crunches until I feel my stomach is
> sufficiently flat. I don't want bigger stomach muscles building up
> under any fat and making it look like I have a gut


Do not go crazy with crunches too. You do not do anything for lower
back, so your posture may suffer if you'll build your abs much.
Stronger abs will flatten your stomach, if they are week now.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:04 AM
Andrzej Rosa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

Dnia 2006-11-16 Shute napisał(a):
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:31:51 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
><bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm not sure if I get it. I do not understand why two weeks of
>>training to failure makes 9-14 days rest necessary. When I glanced at
>>HST it was necessary, because they used to increase weight every
>>workout and you ended up doing plenty of negatives for every exercise
>>(which is damn crazy), so there was not much choice. Maybe they
>>dropped it, but then why do they still advocate such a long rest period?
>>You shouldn't need that much. Maybe a week, but I'd go by feel.

>
> I don't follow this particular routine so maybe it is different. But
> I thought the rest period was at the start and in between cycles.
> Not every two weeks but after you complete your 5,10, and 15 rep sets.
> Which in this example given would be 6 weeks. The initial rest
> period is to detrain your body from whatever you did before.


Good way to make sure, that *my* program will be the holy grail.

> Not sure
> what the rest in between cycles is about.


HST ends in training past failure for all exercises all the time. With
three times a week full body workouts it must lead to burnout, so to
start over one must rest. It's stupid, that's what it is.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2006, 09:01 AM
Shute
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: HST -- Did I Understand This?

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:03:27 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
<bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Good way to make sure, that *my* program will be the holy grail.


Pretty much. I think they assume people have been doing all sorts of
stupid things. They don't want hat to taint their program.

>> Not sure
>> what the rest in between cycles is about.

>
>HST ends in training past failure for all exercises all the time. With
>three times a week full body workouts it must lead to burnout, so to
>start over one must rest. It's stupid, that's what it is.


Yeah I don't get how the HST website uses the HIT approach. I tried
HIT once but didn't like it although it sounded good. I am using a
similar rep approach in my current workout but it's design is closer
to typical workouts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I don't understand... OmManiPadmeOmelet misc.fitness.weights 38 11-09-2006 09:35 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41