MFW 2008 - a new beginning?

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:59:27 -0700 (PDT), David Cohen
<sammiesdad@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jul 15, 6:39*am, "Lester L." <lo...@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>>
>> I miss Whit, Elzi, Pat A., Lyle and the rest of the folks who have moved on.
>
>Lester, did you catch "Charles/John"'s entry in the Olympic Speed
>Hypocrisy event? First, he hopes for a kinder, gentler, less nasty
>MFW,

I really rather said that I don't like bullies and that they will find
me formidable opposition.

>and then goes out of his way to insult Elzi, who isn't even here.

Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
instructions, which I told her at the time.

She then ran fer them thar hills pardner, wrassled a wildcat with her
bare hands while roping a steer, and did three one-arm pull-ups from a
sky hook, while mending barbed wire fences with the other hand!! ;o)

>
>He's so brave in cyberspace. In person, Elzi would kick his ass.

Yeah, yeah, yeah; the usual tired old claptrap; we're all allegedly
"brave in cyberspace" when we don't agree with some fuckwit blowhard
and make them look a cunt!

Did you ever get around to actually giving her one Cohen? Most of your
chums did!! ;o)

>
>Between the Charles/Curt/David trio and those that enable them, this
>group is well and truly dead.

If the heat in the kitchen is too hot Moyshe, it's time to go for a
cold one...

>
>See you elsewhere.

Door on the way out and mind your arse ring a bell matey?!! ;o)

TTFN!

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:41:45 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@gmail.com> wrote
>
>On Jul 15, 6:39 am, "Lester L." <lo...@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>>
>> I miss Whit, Elzi, Pat A., Lyle and the rest of the folks who have moved
>> on.
>
>Lester, did you catch "Charles/John"'s entry in the Olympic Speed
>Hypocrisy event? First, he hopes for a kinder, gentler, less nasty
>MFW, and then goes out of his way to insult Elzi, who isn't even here.
>
>He's so brave in cyberspace. In person, Elzi would kick his ass.
>
>Between the Charles/Curt/David trio and those that enable them, this
>group is well and truly dead.
>---------------------
>Like all internet pussies, chucky and gang get real upset if anybody with
>any kind of expertise or knowledge is present.

Your recent arrival has certainly not raised any possibility of that
situation arising! ;o)

>So they run them off. It is
>part of dumbing down civilization until everything good is dead.
>

Right on cue...

....shout shit, and look who leaps on the shovel!! ;o)

This is just like old times; keep them coming Lee, your a laugh a
minute! ;o)

"Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>
> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>
Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.

I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:22:05 +0100, Charles <jrh@msn.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:41:45 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
><leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@gmail.com> wrote
>>
>>On Jul 15, 6:39 am, "Lester L." <lo...@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I miss Whit, Elzi, Pat A., Lyle and the rest of the folks who have moved
>>> on.
>>
>>Lester, did you catch "Charles/John"'s entry in the Olympic Speed
>>Hypocrisy event? First, he hopes for a kinder, gentler, less nasty
>>MFW, and then goes out of his way to insult Elzi, who isn't even here.
>>
>>He's so brave in cyberspace. In person, Elzi would kick his ass.
>>
>>Between the Charles/Curt/David trio and those that enable them, this
>>group is well and truly dead.
>>---------------------
>>Like all internet pussies, chucky and gang get real upset if anybody with
>>any kind of expertise or knowledge is present.
>
>Your recent arrival has certainly not raised any possibility of that
>situation arising! ;o)
>
>>So they run them off. It is
>>part of dumbing down civilization until everything good is dead.
>>
>
>Right on cue...
>
>...shout shit, and look who leaps on the shovel!! ;o)
>
>This is just like old times; keep them coming Lee, *your* a laugh a
>minute! ;o)

For the pedants among you, that should of course have read "you're"...

....sorry for that unusual lapse!! ;o)

"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> "Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>
>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>
> Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
> in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.
>
> I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.

With regard to areas of her expertise, I don't think there are many people
who could hold a candle to her. No doubt. But more importantly, in areas
where she wasn't an expert, I recall her being reasonable and not a
know-it-all. I don't recall the riding instructions issue, but I do know
that she seemed as level-headed as a woman can be.

Some people have trouble dealing with interaction with superiors in an
subject. The Oracle need not be easy reading.

-Lester

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:37 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>
>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>
>Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
>in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.

She knew fuck all about horses! ;o)

And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
"intellect"!!...

....and all the alleged intelligence in her supposed "little finger"
does little to disguise the fact that you still possess all the charm
and intelligence of a horse's arse!!

>
>I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.
>

If you carry on in this vein Lee I'm going to get the impression that
you don't like me! ;o)

NEXT!!

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:37:23 -0400, "Lester L."
<long5@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:

>"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> "Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>>
>>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>>
>> Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
>> in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.
>>
>> I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.
>
>With regard to areas of her expertise, I don't think there are many people
>who could hold a candle to her. No doubt. But more importantly, in areas
>where she wasn't an expert, I recall her being reasonable and not a
>know-it-all. I don't recall the riding instructions issue, but I do know
>that she seemed as level-headed as a woman can be.

Well this time she was literally talking out of the arse by which she
reckoned she steered!!

>
>Some people have trouble dealing with interaction with superiors in an
>subject.

She certainly did this time.

She 'bit' off more than she could chew, and it was necessary to 'rein'
her in, but she 'bridled' so I had to 'pull her up'.

> The Oracle need not be easy reading.
>

The Coracle was also difficult to navigate. ;o)

"Charles" Gossiped some
>
> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
> "intellect"!!...
>
Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
disqualification was another person with the same name. Elzi had a medical
condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned substances
safely.

Good show chucky. Never let the facts get in the way of your classless
gossiping.

And she does work as a scientist. Which you find objectionable. In your
world gossip passes as fact. No wonder you object to any kind of true
intelligence.

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:lonp741v9qv40fhk2nvelq9mbuj4gdjij4@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:37 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
>
> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
> "intellect"!!...

How does your proposition (disqualified from a contest for taking illegal
substance) relate to her arguments and opinions?

> ...and all the alleged intelligence in her supposed "little finger"
> does little to disguise the fact that you still possess all the charm
> and intelligence of a horse's arse!!

I'd guess her IQ is quite high, and in terms of charm, she seemed quite nice
at least online. Then again, I took her posts at face value and didn't get
too involved.

"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:RdmdnXZVcra1dOHVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
> "Charles" Gossiped some
>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>> "intellect"!!...
>>
> Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
> disqualification was another person with the same name. Elzi had a
> medical condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned
> substances safely.

Really? Wow. That's truly a coincidence, that two female bodybuilders
having the same name. Then again, maybe not, assuming Elzi is short for
Elizabeth which is pretty common.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:09 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Charles" Gossiped some
>>
>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>> "intellect"!!...
>>
>Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
>disqualification was another person with the same name.

The telephone directory is simply full of mid-50's female bodybuilding
Elzi Volks darling; it's such a tiresomely common name....

>Elzi had a medical
>condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned substances
>safely.

BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... etc

That excuse was as pathetic then as it is now.

>
>Good show chucky. Never let the facts get in the way of your classless
>gossiping.

I would suspect that you think that Elzi would find your slavering
defence of her somehow endearing. The truth of the matter is that she
will think you are the pratt you really are and be well pissed of with
you, for regurgitating the whole distasteful saga again.

You are a "troll" Mr Michaels and if you are not very careful I may
have to give serious consideration, with all due deliberation, whether
or not to threaten you with a jolly good "killfiling" if you don't
mend your ways!!

[You may recall "killfiles" I trust? Remember, you used to say you
couldn't see a thing I wrote because I was in your "killfiles" - or
"bozo bin" as you so playfully called them. Of course then you forgot,
as you have now, and in anger felt compelled to respond to me directly
- you silly old impetuous thing!!]

KGFY!

Okay yah? ;o)

Burr wrote:
> "David"
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd consider it, but then I'd lose the overtime I'm earning by doing
>>> this. I can use the money at time and a half. ;-) I may whine
>>> about it now but I'll be glad some next payday...
>>
>> Yeah I was kidding - you can't let your team down like that -
>>
>>> --
>>> Peace! Om
>>>
>>> "Human nature seems to be to control other people
>>> until they put their foot down." -- Stephan Rothstein
>>
>>
>
> Shit, he didn't say a word about "team" all he said was money!!!!
>
> That's all he cares about, fuck the team!!!

depends - who is on the team
>
> Killer

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:k3up74pgpd15jgd0cfem2ccg4h74nm81su@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:09 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
> <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Charles" Gossiped some
>>>
>>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>>> "intellect"!!...
>>>
>>Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
>>disqualification was another person with the same name.
>
> The telephone directory is simply full of mid-50's female bodybuilding
> Elzi Volks darling; it's such a tiresomely common name....
>
>>Elzi had a medical
>>condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned substances
>>safely.
>
> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... etc
>
> That excuse was as pathetic then as it is now.
>
>>
>>Good show chucky. Never let the facts get in the way of your classless
>>gossiping.
>
> I would suspect that you think that Elzi would find your slavering
> defence of her somehow endearing. The truth of the matter is that she
> will think you are the pratt you really are and be well pissed of with
> you, for regurgitating the whole distasteful saga again.
>
> You are a "troll" Mr Michaels and if you are not very careful I may
> have to give serious consideration, with all due deliberation, whether
> or not to threaten you with a jolly good "killfiling" if you don't
> mend your ways!!
>
> [You may recall "killfiles" I trust? Remember, you used to say you
> couldn't see a thing I wrote because I was in your "killfiles" - or
> "bozo bin" as you so playfully called them. Of course then you forgot,
> as you have now, and in anger felt compelled to respond to me directly
> - you silly old impetuous thing!!]
>
> KGFY!
>
> Okay yah? ;o)

Still delusional as ever.

Still the total troll and scumbag.

Now it all comes back to me.

Why it is just not worth the effort to deal with slime like you chucky.

I will go now and unsubscribe. You are free to promote gossip and
mediocrity now chucky.

Charles wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:37:23 -0400, "Lester L."
> <long5@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>
>>With regard to areas of her expertise, I don't think there are many people
>>who could hold a candle to her. No doubt. But more importantly, in areas
>>where she wasn't an expert, I recall her being reasonable and not a
>>know-it-all. I don't recall the riding instructions issue, but I do know
>>that she seemed as level-headed as a woman can be.
>
> Well this time she was literally talking out of the arse by which she
> reckoned she steered!!

What she wrote?

Because something similar actually happens. You can steer a horse with the
way you sit on it. It all depends on a horse and its training, of course,
but most of advanced stuff (how do you call it, dressage?) isn't even
possible without directing your mount with the way you sit on it.

While not exactly what you wrote, it seems enough to be suspicious.

[...]
--
Andrzej Rosa

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:16:54 +0100, Charles <jrh@msn.com> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

>
>Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>instructions, which I told her at the time.

Elzi has/had a nice ass so it was all good.

>
>Did you ever get around to actually giving her one Cohen? Most of your
>chums did!! ;o)
>
I never did and she had a nice ass.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:09 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>
>"Charles" Gossiped some
>>
>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>> "intellect"!!...
>>
>Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
>disqualification was another person with the same name. Elzi had a medical
>condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned substances
>safely.

Uhmm, it was her and her suspension is over. Let's move on.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:41:34 +0100, Charles <jrh@msn.com> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

>On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:37 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
><leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>>
>>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>>
>>Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
>>in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.
>
>She knew fuck all about horses! ;o)
>
>And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>"intellect"!!...

That's pretty low John.

>
>...and all the alleged intelligence in her supposed "little finger"
>does little to disguise the fact that you still possess all the charm
>and intelligence of a horse's arse!!
>
>>
>>I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.
>>
>
>If you carry on in this vein Lee I'm going to get the impression that
>you don't like me! ;o)
>
>NEXT!!

So much for trying to let bygones be bygones. I'm disappointed in you
John. Elzi is a very nice woman...and intelligent.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:41:45 -0400, "Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@gmail.com> wrote
>
>On Jul 15, 6:39 am, "Lester L." <lo...@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>>
>> I miss Whit, Elzi, Pat A., Lyle and the rest of the folks who have moved
>> on.
>
>Lester, did you catch "Charles/John"'s entry in the Olympic Speed
>Hypocrisy event? First, he hopes for a kinder, gentler, less nasty
>MFW, and then goes out of his way to insult Elzi, who isn't even here.
>
>He's so brave in cyberspace. In person, Elzi would kick his ass.
>
>Between the Charles/Curt/David trio and those that enable them, this
>group is well and truly dead.
>---------------------
>Like all internet pussies, chucky and gang get real upset if anybody with
>any kind of expertise or knowledge is present. So they run them off. It is
>part of dumbing down civilization until everything good is dead.


If one allows a couple of internet pussies run him off,
well, you complete the thought.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:29:04 +0200, Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Charles wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:37:23 -0400, "Lester L."
>> <long5@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:
>>
>>>With regard to areas of her expertise, I don't think there are many people
>>>who could hold a candle to her. No doubt. But more importantly, in areas
>>>where she wasn't an expert, I recall her being reasonable and not a
>>>know-it-all. I don't recall the riding instructions issue, but I do know
>>>that she seemed as level-headed as a woman can be.
>>
>> Well this time she was literally talking out of the arse by which she
>> reckoned she steered!!
>
>What she wrote?
>
>Because something similar actually happens. You can steer a horse with the
>way you sit on it. It all depends on a horse and its training, of course,
>but most of advanced stuff (how do you call it, dressage?) isn't even
>possible without directing your mount with the way you sit on it.

The point is taken and while you are loosely correct about postural
indications to one's mount, there are a whole host of signals and
instructions that convey the rider's intentions to a trained horse.

Squeezing alternate buttocks to indicate the choice of direction
(left/right) required is not one of them. While knee and other leg
pressures are acknowledged control options, just how a horse is
expected to know what your arse cheeks are doing, through the depth of
a fucking great leather saddle, is patent nonsense and what made her
bullshit so hilariously risible.

>
>While not exactly what you wrote, it seems enough to be suspicious.
>

You will need to know a great deal more about equine practices to
validate any such harboured "suspicions"!!

Trust me - I know these things!! ;o)

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:24:47 -0500, John Hanson
<jhanson@northernlinks.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:41:34 +0100, Charles <jrh@msn.com> wrote in
>misc.fitness.weights:
>
>>On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:25:37 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
>><leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>>>
>>>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>>>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>>>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>>>
>>>Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working knowledge
>>>in her little finger than you will have in your whole miserable existence.
>>
>>She knew fuck all about horses! ;o)
>>
>>And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>>taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>>"intellect"!!...
>
>That's pretty low John.

She would not hesitate to use such information to have a sideswipe at
me!

>
>>
>>...and all the alleged intelligence in her supposed "little finger"
>>does little to disguise the fact that you still possess all the charm
>>and intelligence of a horse's arse!!
>>
>>>
>>>I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.
>>>
>>
>>If you carry on in this vein Lee I'm going to get the impression that
>>you don't like me! ;o)
>>
>>NEXT!!
>
>So much for trying to let bygones be bygones.

I started off with good intentions as I really thought there was a
mood to reconcile.

Unfortunately, Cohen (with whom I normally get on very well) threw a
spanner in those works, while the malcontent Idiot Michaels couldn't
wait to weigh in and vent his foul spleen.

You know me well enough John and would perhaps recognise, as no doubt
did they, that I responded typically and predictably.

>I'm disappointed in you
>John. Elzi is a very nice woman...and intelligent.

That is not how she presented herself to me!

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:29:26 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:k3up74pgpd15jgd0cfem2ccg4h74nm81su@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:15:09 -0400, "Lee Michaels"
>> <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Charles" Gossiped some
>>>>
>>>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>>>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>>>> "intellect"!!...
>>>>
>>>Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
>>>disqualification was another person with the same name.
>>
>> The telephone directory is simply full of mid-50's female bodybuilding
>> Elzi Volks darling; it's such a tiresomely common name....
>>
>>>Elzi had a medical
>>>condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned substances
>>>safely.
>>
>> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... etc
>>
>> That excuse was as pathetic then as it is now.
>>
>>>
>>>Good show chucky. Never let the facts get in the way of your classless
>>>gossiping.
>>
>> I would suspect that you think that Elzi would find your slavering
>> defence of her somehow endearing. The truth of the matter is that she
>> will think you are the pratt you really are and be well pissed of with
>> you, for regurgitating the whole distasteful saga again.
>>
>> You are a "troll" Mr Michaels and if you are not very careful I may
>> have to give serious consideration, with all due deliberation, whether
>> or not to threaten you with a jolly good "killfiling" if you don't
>> mend your ways!!
>>
>> [You may recall "killfiles" I trust? Remember, you used to say you
>> couldn't see a thing I wrote because I was in your "killfiles" - or
>> "bozo bin" as you so playfully called them. Of course then you forgot,
>> as you have now, and in anger felt compelled to respond to me directly
>> - you silly old impetuous thing!!]
>>
>> KGFY!
>>
>> Okay yah? ;o)
>
>Still delusional as ever.
>
>Still the total troll and scumbag.
>
>Now it all comes back to me.
>
>Why it is just not worth the effort to deal with slime like you chucky.
>
>I will go now and unsubscribe. You are free to promote gossip and
>mediocrity now chucky.
>
>

Cheerio old darling, it was so nice to swap total and utter bollocks
with you again.

Mind the door etc...

;o)

"Steve Freides" <st...@fridayscomputer.com> wrote:
[...]

> and it will be what it will be.

Thank you, Doris Day.

--

Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *John Hanson <jhan...@northernlinks.com> wrote:
[...]

> > <snip>I'm a tech diver now...gone over to the darkside.
>
> If it's good money and you get to spend more time in full scuba,
> what's there to complain about?

Okay, I take that back. OM gives a shit, but I think he's only being
"nice."

--

John Hanson <jhan...@northernlinks.com> wrote:
[...]

> <snip> I'm a tech diver now...gone over to the darkside.

No one gives a shit, Hanson.

--

Charles <j...@msn.com> wrote:
> John Hanson <jhan...@northernlinks.com> wrote:
[...]

> ><snip> I'm a tech diver now...gone over to the darkside.

[...]

> Good to hear from you John and glad to hear that you are really
> enjoying your SCUBA diving. It's a long time since I last ventured
> into the depths and with a very busy schedule both socially and
> commercially, I can't see that changing in the near future.
>
> However, I'm flying down to Malta in September for a long weekend with
> a chum who has a villa on Gozo, so I may see if we can get a dip then.
> Some great clear dives to be had in those waters.
>
> Take care mate and have a great Sunday - you know I intend to! ;o)

OKAY, OKAY! CHARLES GIVES A SHIT, TOO. BUT THAT'S IT, CHARLES AND OM
AND... YOU STILL CAN'T BENCH AS MUCH AS WHAT'S HIS FACE!

Ahem.

Seriously, I bet they're just falling all over themselves in rec.scuba
or wherever. Bemoaning your absence!

"What did we do to deserve looooooosing John Hanson!!!!"

Right.

--

Some crybaby schmuck wrote:
[...]

> Between the Charles/Curt/David trio and those that enable them, this
> group is well and truly dead.
>
> See you elsewhere.

Whatever.

Be here or be elsewhere, but keep that trite "enable them" nonsense to
yourself. At least come up with your own schtick.

Promote an intelligent dialogue rather than asserting some imagined
death of the newsgroup. There's no fun in that, though, is there?

--

Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
[...]

> If one allows a couple of internet pussies run him off,
> well, you complete the thought.

I miss JWM.

--

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6c51bcd-1b67-41da-885b-bbbf348e0b77@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> "Steve Freides" <st...@fridayscomputer.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> and it will be what it will be.
>
> Thank you, Doris Day.
>
The future's now ours to see

> --
>
>

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:487dcef9$0$17511$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d6c51bcd-1b67-41da-885b-bbbf348e0b77@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> "Steve Freides" <st...@fridayscomputer.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> and it will be what it will be.
>>
>> Thank you, Doris Day.
>>
> The future's now ours to see
>
Sorry, for you embeciles the above was meant to be

The future's not ours to see

>> --
>>
>>
>
>

Charles wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:29:04 +0200, Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Charles wrote:
>>
>>> Well this time she was literally talking out of the arse by which she
>>> reckoned she steered!!
>>
>>What she wrote?
>>
>>Because something similar actually happens. You can steer a horse with
>>the way you sit on it. It all depends on a horse and its training, of
>>course, but most of advanced stuff (how do you call it, dressage?) isn't
>>even possible without directing your mount with the way you sit on it.
>
> The point is taken and while you are loosely correct

I can be more precise, just not in English.

> about postural
> indications to one's mount, there are a whole host of signals and
> instructions that convey the rider's intentions to a trained horse.
>
> Squeezing alternate buttocks to indicate the choice of direction
> (left/right) required is not one of them.

That seems odd, I admit. OK, I'll also admit that it is actually quite
funny. Especially when a woman with supposedly good arse writes it "for
real"...

> While knee and other leg
> pressures are acknowledged control options,

So is changing the way you sit on a horse and ride the horse. Your lower
leg doesn't necessary need to move and you can convey a host of steering
signals to a trained mount anyway. But I admit that it depends how a horse
is trained. If it is trained to react to your legs it will ignore
your "sitting" signals, and the reverse is often true too (and both
together, and none, just to not be called loosely correct again ;-)).

> just how a horse is
> expected to know what your arse cheeks are doing, through the depth of
> a fucking great leather saddle, is patent nonsense and what made her
> bullshit so hilariously risible.

Well, it's hard to squeeze your buttcocks without subconsciously changing
your riding position, your leg position or whatever else, so it could
actually work, with a very well trained and attentive horse.

>>While not exactly what you wrote, it seems enough to be suspicious.
>>
>
> You will need to know a great deal more about equine practices to
> validate any such harboured "suspicions"!!

How do you know how much I know? Anyway, I doubted that you presented
Elzi's words correctly. I'm still not sure about it...

> Trust me

Why? ;-o

> - I know these things!! ;o)

Maybe, but as you are a member of a nation which never had good cavalry,
your equine expertise must be questioned. By default. ;-)

--
Andrzej Rosa

In article
<2c691ffa-a8f0-45d1-b7c9-cede721317c8@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > *John Hanson <jhan...@northernlinks.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > <snip>I'm a tech diver now...gone over to the darkside.
> >
> > If it's good money and you get to spend more time in full scuba,
> > what's there to complain about?
>
> Okay, I take that back. OM gives a shit, but I think he's only being
> "nice."
>
> --

Om gives a shit about a lot of things...
Unfortunately, it seems it seldom does much good. :-(

I need more money, more influence, and a law degree?
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people
until they put their foot down." -- Stephan Rothstein

Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]

> I need more money, more influence, and a law degree?

heh

What's that Warren Zevon song? Lawyers, Guns, and Money?

I live in Carlisle, Pennsylvania which is home to the Dickinson School
of Law. I've always been curious about taking the LSAT just to see
what that test would be like. Anyway, I read an article recently that
stated the top firms only recruit from the top schools (no duh) so if
you're not the top grad from the top school then that big paycheck may
never materialize. Lots of "new" lawyers living on $40K per year.

The grass is always greener.

And, yes, I strongly suspect you meant you"need a law degree" for the
knowledge of the subject rather than the possible financial rewards.

--

In article
<1c1ee2f0-96d8-4a89-adc6-4e31b0af8199@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Omelet <ompome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I need more money, more influence, and a law degree?
>
> heh
>
> What's that Warren Zevon song? Lawyers, Guns, and Money?

Better than drugs, guns and money. <g>

>
> I live in Carlisle, Pennsylvania which is home to the Dickinson School
> of Law. I've always been curious about taking the LSAT just to see
> what that test would be like. Anyway, I read an article recently that
> stated the top firms only recruit from the top schools (no duh) so if
> you're not the top grad from the top school then that big paycheck may
> never materialize. Lots of "new" lawyers living on $40K per year.
>
> The grass is always greener.
>
> And, yes, I strongly suspect you meant you"need a law degree" for the
> knowledge of the subject rather than the possible financial rewards.
>
> --

'zactly.
--
Peace! Om

"Human nature seems to be to control other people
until they put their foot down." -- Stephan Rothstein

"Lester L." <long5@ix.netcomSPAMBLOX.com> wrote:

>"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:RdmdnXZVcra1dOHVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com ...
>>
>> "Charles" Gossiped some
>>> And if I remember rightly, she got herself disqualified and banned for
>>> taking illegal substances. Some "working scientist" and some
>>> "intellect"!!...
>>>
>> Like a true gossip, you did not remember the fact that this so called
>> disqualification was another person with the same name. Elzi had a
>> medical condition that would not have allowed her to take the banned
>> substances safely.
>
>Really? Wow. That's truly a coincidence, that two female bodybuilders
>having the same name. Then again, maybe not, assuming Elzi is short for
>Elizabeth which is pretty common.

Elzibeth

"Lee Michaels" <leemichaels@comcast.net> wrote in
news:C5SdnUexGpERQOHVnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@comcast.com:

>
> "Charles" babbled some more bullshit
>>
>> Elzi was a swaggering imitation bully, who insulted our intelligence
>> and made a fucking idiot of herself with her bullshit riding
>> instructions, which I told her at the time.
>>
> Elzi, a working scientist, had more intellect and actual working
> knowledge in her little finger than you will have in your whole
> miserable existence.
>
> I can see how a pompous fraud like yourself would object.
>

She couldn't reasonably be described as a "working scientist". At best,
she was a lab tech.

She was a buffoon who obscured the truth about herself in a scheme to
become a female counterpart to Will Brink.

She wanted the recognition that Brink and Lyle earned, but she didn't have
the patience to get it legitimatel