<!-- google_ad_section_start -->"Natural Bodybuilding and Fitness" Magazine<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Fitness and Nutrition > Fitness > misc.fitness.weights

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2008, 11:52 PM
Prisoner at War
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Natural Bodybuilding and Fitness" Magazine


Finally got around to checking out an issue today.

The guy on the cover looks buff all right, unlike many natural
bodybuilders who look like slim dudes with some muscle. As a matter
of fact, a lot of these natural bodybuilders are funny-looking, with
big heads and slim physiques. Interestingly, some of their
championship trophies model a steroid-addled physique!

Main thing I noticed is that these naturals have legs almost
comparable to the junkies, with the teardrop sweep and all that --
though nowhere near as huge, striated, or "freaky" -- but the
arms...my God, the arms are sorely lacking!

Their arms are the arms drug-addled female bodybuilders have, only
even less thick! Looking at only the silhouette of these naturals,
you could tell they're naturals because of the big heads, relative to
the rest of their bodies, and because of the arms, which are rather
slim!

I wonder what it is about steroids that seems to really beef up the
arms...???

Speaking of appearances, the cover guy looks great on the cover, but
inside, in the one-page story on him (a one-page cover story?!), the
accompanying photograph, in which he does a different pose, clearly
mark him out as a natural -- namely, the "big" head. Which, of
course, only looks big in comparison to the druggies who pump up their
muscles with steroids. But it was interesting to see how naturals,
even more than juicin' junkies, illustrate that bodybuilding is first
and foremost about illusion: a different pose, a different angle, and
the cover guy, who's a top-seeded star ("The Next Arnold"), turns out
to be just another college athlete lookalike!

Anyway, as for the rest of the magazine, it's a very interesting
issue, and I just might subscribe, finally, to a bodybuilding
magazine, depending on how the next few issues turn out! This month,
they have the usual articles on training -- almost like usenet posts,
actually, in how general they are -- and there's even a feature on the
drug-testing protocols of naturals, which I found very interesting
indeed. Alas, another 30% of the magazine is devoted to typical
"industry gossip," though it reads more like a local congregation's
newsletter than a Teen People column (i.e., friendly and familiar, not
sophomoric and redundant).

A bit weird that they have the same phony supplement ads like the
"mainstream" bodybuilding mags, though MuscleTech was sensitive enough
to use two natural bodybuilders in at least one of them! It also
caught my eye that the magazine ran that ubiquitous legalsteroids.com
multi-page, but ad revenue is ad revenue, naturally (lame pun
intended).

None of those annoying subscription cards that fall out and litter the
place, thankfully, though only one little 3x4 ad calling for
subscribers!

One last thing: the females look much better than the junkies -- they
actually look like females! -- though still just a bit too skinny for
my tastes. WTF is with this ten-inch "Ethiopian arm" look that's so
fashionable???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2008, 07:07 AM
alohanema
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Natural Bodybuilding and Fitness" Magazine

On Jan 25, 6:19 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Finally got around to checking out an issue today.
>
> The guy on the cover looks buff all right, unlike many natural
> bodybuilders who look like slim dudes with some muscle. As a matter
> of fact, a lot of these natural bodybuilders are funny-looking, with
> big heads and slim physiques. Interestingly, some of their
> championship trophies model a steroid-addled physique!
>
> Main thing I noticed is that these naturals have legs almost
> comparable to the junkies, with the teardrop sweep and all that --
> though nowhere near as huge, striated, or "freaky" -- but the
> arms...my God, the arms are sorely lacking!
>
> Their arms are the arms drug-addled female bodybuilders have, only
> even less thick! Looking at only the silhouette of these naturals,
> you could tell they're naturals because of the big heads, relative to
> the rest of their bodies, and because of the arms, which are rather
> slim!
>
> I wonder what it is about steroids that seems to really beef up the
> arms...???
>
> Speaking of appearances, the cover guy looks great on the cover, but
> inside, in the one-page story on him (a one-page cover story?!), the
> accompanying photograph, in which he does a different pose, clearly
> mark him out as a natural -- namely, the "big" head. Which, of
> course, only looks big in comparison to the druggies who pump up their
> muscles with steroids. But it was interesting to see how naturals,
> even more than juicin' junkies, illustrate that bodybuilding is first
> and foremost about illusion: a different pose, a different angle, and
> the cover guy, who's a top-seeded star ("The Next Arnold"), turns out
> to be just another college athlete lookalike!
>
> Anyway, as for the rest of the magazine, it's a very interesting
> issue, and I just might subscribe, finally, to a bodybuilding
> magazine, depending on how the next few issues turn out! This month,
> they have the usual articles on training -- almost like usenet posts,
> actually, in how general they are -- and there's even a feature on the
> drug-testing protocols of naturals, which I found very interesting
> indeed. Alas, another 30% of the magazine is devoted to typical
> "industry gossip," though it reads more like a local congregation's
> newsletter than a Teen People column (i.e., friendly and familiar, not
> sophomoric and redundant).
>
> A bit weird that they have the same phony supplement ads like the
> "mainstream" bodybuilding mags, though MuscleTech was sensitive enough
> to use two natural bodybuilders in at least one of them! It also
> caught my eye that the magazine ran that ubiquitous legalsteroids.com
> multi-page, but ad revenue is ad revenue, naturally (lame pun
> intended).
>
> None of those annoying subscription cards that fall out and litter the
> place, thankfully, though only one little 3x4 ad calling for
> subscribers!
>
> One last thing: the females look much better than the junkies -- they
> actually look like females! -- though still just a bit too skinny for
> my tastes. WTF is with this ten-inch "Ethiopian arm" look that's so
> fashionable???


I prefer looking slim dude with some muscle to looking buff ^_^
http://letdiet.blogspot.com

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2008, 10:48 AM
Prisoner at War
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Natural Bodybuilding and Fitness" Magazine

On Jan 30, 1:44 am, alohanema <alohan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I prefer looking slim dude with some muscle to looking buff ^_^http://letdiet.blogspot.com



Yeah, that's precisely what most females prefer, too! It's theorized
that such males look "safe" and not overly-aggressive, unlike big meat-
locker dudes...which may be why there's relatively few of us around
with such Herculean genetics!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"The Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Uses of Curcumin in Health and Disease" [3 of 4] "Recovery Set.vol0+1.par2" yEnc (1/2) Auntie Inflammatory alt.support.cancer.prostate 0 08-29-2007 11:46 PM
"The Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Uses of Curcumin in Health and Disease" [3 of 4] "Recovery Set.vol0+1.par2" yEnc (2/2) Auntie Inflammatory alt.support.cancer.prostate 0 08-29-2007 11:46 PM
"LA Fitness" and "Body of Change" Rip Off Blog steven5000@gmail.com misc.fitness.weights 0 03-02-2007 07:37 PM
"LA Fitness" AND "Body of Change" Personal Training is a Major Scam and Rip Off! Beware! steven5000@gmail.com misc.fitness.weights 0 03-02-2007 04:29 AM
"Diabetic Living" magazine diet plan - don't waste your money (yet, anyway!) amyky123 alt.support.diabetes 12 01-03-2007 01:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41