OT: The War On Drugs and Bill Of Rights

> Last year, Pennsylvanian Keith Emerich had his license revoked by state
> authorities after he revealed to his doctor during an emergency room visit
> that he sometimes drinks a six-pack of beer per day. His doctor reported
> him. Emerich wasn't accused or charged with drunk driving. In a bizarre
> twist on the principle of "presumption of innocence," Emerich must now
> prove to the state that he doesn't drive after drinking before he can get
> his license back.

That shouldn't be a very difficult proof.

1. He obeys all law
2. The state has taken away his license
3. He is unable to drive legally without a license
4. Thus, he doesn't drink before driving because he does not drive.

Justice would be served if someone beat that doctor to death with a log.