Re: Abusing Animals While Black

On Aug 31, 9:45 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one Kathy Rudy, an associate professor of
> "women's studies" at Duke University, weighs in on, as the headline puts it,
> "White Culture's Hypocrisy About Vick." That would be Michael Vick, the
> erstwhile NFL player who pleaded guilty to conspiracy earlier this week in a
> case involving illegal dogfighting.
>
> Rudy, who is also an "ethicist," describes herself as "a strong advocate of
> animal welfare." Nonetheless, she says, "I find what's happening with Vick . .
> . alarming":
>
> We need to face the fact that dog fighting is not the only
> "sport" that abuses animals. Cruelty also occurs in rodeos,
> horse and dog racing (all of which mistreat animals and often
> kill them when no longer useful). There are also millions of
> dogs and cats we put to death in "shelters" across the country
> because they lack a home, and billions of creatures we torture
> in factory farms for our food.
>
> Vick treated his dogs very cruelly; there is no question about
> that. But I see one important difference between these more
> socially acceptable mistreatments and the anger focused on
> Vick: Vick is black, and most of the folks in charge of the
> other activities are white.
>
> Rudy then goes on to make the following distinction:
>
> While white middle and upper classes continue to watch horses
> run to the point of exhaustion and risk breaking their legs,
> they regard dogfighting as something that only low-class "thugs
> and drug dealers" find entertaining. Indeed, a reading of many
> of the Vick news stories indicts him and his friends as much
> for being involved in hip-hop subculture as for fighting dogs...
>
> I am not saying dogfighting is acceptable, but rather that
> Vick should be publicly criticized for that activity, not for
> his participation in hip-hop subculture. Whether or not dogs
> are fought more by minorities than white people is actually
> unknown, but the media representations of the last several
> weeks make it appear that black culture and dogfighting are
> inextricably intertwined. We need to find ways to condemn
> dogfighting without denigrating black culture with it.
>
> Huh? Denigrate means "to blacken," so Rudy is opposed to the blackening of
> black culture. That's the kind of intellectual rigor we've come to expect from
> the women's studies department at Duke.
>
> But wait. Assuming she meant something like "disparaging" instead of
> "blackening," isn't she the one who's guilty of that? Blacks have far worthier
> contributions to America than the "hip-hop subculture" with its "thugs and
> drug dealers." It is patronizing at best, racist at worst, to equate "black
> culture" with what Stanley Crouch has called "the most dehumanizing images of
> black people since the dawn of minstrelsy in the 19th century."
>
> Rudy writes:
>
> I would like to believe that in 25 years we're going to look
> back on our current treatment of many animals as cruel and
> intolerable, and I do believe that the welfare of animals is
> coming into focus as the next great social movement in this
> country. Civil rights, feminism, gay and lesbian rights, and
> the Latino movement have transformed American life for the
> better. I think that can--and should--happen for animals.
>
> But if the "hip-hop subculture" is the apogee of "black culture," why should
> we expect that this transformational movement of animals will produce anything
> better than a dog-eat-dog world?

"Women's Studies", what a fucking joke. I'll bet Prof. Rudy is a muff-
muncher and
a skank to boot.

ted

Repeal the 19th amendment.

Ted" <tedorn44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188580736.801900.157030@g4g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
> On Aug 31, 9:45 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one Kathy Rudy, an associate
>> professor of
>> "women's studies" at Duke University, weighs in on, as the headline puts
>> it,
>> "White Culture's Hypocrisy About Vick." That would be Michael Vick, the
>> erstwhile NFL player who pleaded guilty to conspiracy earlier this week
>> in a
>> case involving illegal dogfighting.
>>
>> Rudy, who is also an "ethicist," describes herself as "a strong advocate
>> of
>> animal welfare." Nonetheless, she says, "I find what's happening with
>> Vick . .
>> . alarming":
>>
>> We need to face the fact that dog fighting is not the only
>> "sport" that abuses animals. Cruelty also occurs in rodeos,
>> horse and dog racing (all of which mistreat animals and often
>> kill them when no longer useful). There are also millions of
>> dogs and cats we put to death in "shelters" across the country
>> because they lack a home, and billions of creatures we torture
>> in factory farms for our food.
>>
>> Vick treated his dogs very cruelly; there is no question about
>> that. But I see one important difference between these more
>> socially acceptable mistreatments and the anger focused on
>> Vick: Vick is black, and most of the folks in charge of the
>> other activities are white.
>>
>> Rudy then goes on to make the following distinction:
>>
>> While white middle and upper classes continue to watch horses
>> run to the point of exhaustion and risk breaking their legs,
>> they regard dogfighting as something that only low-class "thugs
>> and drug dealers" find entertaining. Indeed, a reading of many
>> of the Vick news stories indicts him and his friends as much
>> for being involved in hip-hop subculture as for fighting dogs...
>>
>> I am not saying dogfighting is acceptable, but rather that
>> Vick should be publicly criticized for that activity, not for
>> his participation in hip-hop subculture. Whether or not dogs
>> are fought more by minorities than white people is actually
>> unknown, but the media representations of the last several
>> weeks make it appear that black culture and dogfighting are
>> inextricably intertwined. We need to find ways to condemn
>> dogfighting without denigrating black culture with it.
>>
>> Huh? Denigrate means "to blacken," so Rudy is opposed to the blackening
>> of
>> black culture. That's the kind of intellectual rigor we've come to expect
>> from
>> the women's studies department at Duke.
>>
>> But wait. Assuming she meant something like "disparaging" instead of
>> "blackening," isn't she the one who's guilty of that? Blacks have far
>> worthier
>> contributions to America than the "hip-hop subculture" with its "thugs
>> and
>> drug dealers." It is patronizing at best, racist at worst, to equate
>> "black
>> culture" with what Stanley Crouch has called "the most dehumanizing
>> images of
>> black people since the dawn of minstrelsy in the 19th century."
>>
>> Rudy writes:
>>
>> I would like to believe that in 25 years we're going to look
>> back on our current treatment of many animals as cruel and
>> intolerable, and I do believe that the welfare of animals is
>> coming into focus as the next great social movement in this
>> country. Civil rights, feminism, gay and lesbian rights, and
>> the Latino movement have transformed American life for the
>> better. I think that can--and should--happen for animals.
>>
>> But if the "hip-hop subculture" is the apogee of "black culture," why
>> should
>> we expect that this transformational movement of animals will produce
>> anything
>> better than a dog-eat-dog world?
>
> "Women's Studies", what a fucking joke. I'll bet Prof. Rudy is a muff-
> muncher and
> a skank to boot.
>
> ted
>
> Repeal the 19th amendment.
>
>
>

You really are a repugnant bigoted little coward.


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

"Ted" <tedorn44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188580736.801900.157030@g4g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
> On Aug 31, 9:45 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one Kathy Rudy, an associate
>> professor of
>> "women's studies" at Duke University, weighs in on, as the headline puts
>> it,
>> "White Culture's Hypocrisy About Vick." That would be Michael Vick, the
>> erstwhile NFL player who pleaded guilty to conspiracy earlier this week
>> in a
>> case involving illegal dogfighting.

It shows the stupidity of the lower classes. This Vick I imagine is some
sort of football player earning a lot of money but yet he has to get
involved in crap like dog fighting.


>>
>> Rudy, who is also an "ethicist," describes herself as "a strong advocate
>> of
>> animal welfare." Nonetheless, she says, "I find what's happening with
>> Vick . .
>> . alarming":
>>
>> We need to face the fact that dog fighting is not the only
>> "sport" that abuses animals. Cruelty also occurs in rodeos,
>> horse and dog racing

It's not exactly the same and besides those sports are legal and regulated.
If a horse brakes a leg there is a vet present to humanely destroy it.In
boxing there is a referee to stop a fight if a boxer is injured and can't
defend himself and there is a doctor present.


(all of which mistreat animals and often
>> kill them when no longer useful). There are also millions of
>> dogs and cats

Blame the cat women lol


we put to death in "shelters"

But it's done humanely and when there's no other choice.

across the country
>> because they lack a home, and billions of creatures we torture
>> in factory farms for our food.

I guess this bitch doesn't eat lol


>>
>> Vick treated his dogs very cruelly; there is no question about
>> that. But I see one important difference between these more
>> socially acceptable mistreatments and the anger focused on
>> Vick: Vick is black, and most of the folks in charge of the
>> other activities are white.

And the comparison with other sports is ridiculous.


>>
>> Rudy then goes on to make the following distinction:
>>
>> While white middle and upper classes continue to watch horses
>> run to the point of exhaustion and risk breaking their legs,

I've been around many horse races and have never seen a horse injured or
drop dead from exhaustion (yes it does occasionally happen). I have seen 2
jockeys killed in the starting gate though. But I guess they were just
little MEN so we won't mention that.



>> they regard dogfighting as something that only low-class "thugs
>> and drug dealers" find entertaining.

Well it's true isn't it.


Indeed, a reading of many
>> of the Vick news stories indicts him and his friends as much
>> for being involved in hip-hop subculture as for fighting dogs...
>>
>> I am not saying dogfighting is acceptable, but rather that
>> Vick should be publicly criticized for that activity, not for
>> his participation in hip-hop subculture. Whether or not dogs
>> are fought more by minorities than white people is actually
>> unknown,

Most people would condemn it regardless of who's doing it.


but the media representations of the last several
>> weeks make it appear that black culture and dogfighting are
>> inextricably intertwined. We need to find ways to condemn
>> dogfighting without denigrating black culture with it.

What's black culture?



>>
>> Huh? Denigrate means "to blacken," so Rudy is opposed to the blackening
>> of
>> black culture. That's the kind of intellectual rigor we've come to expect
>> from
>> the women's studies department at Duke.

These girls are morons.


>>
>> But wait. Assuming she meant something like "disparaging" instead of
>> "blackening," isn't she the one who's guilty of that? Blacks have far
>> worthier
>> contributions to America than the "hip-hop subculture" with its "thugs
>> and
>> drug dealers." It is patronizing at best, racist at worst, to equate
>> "black
>> culture" with what Stanley Crouch has called "the most dehumanizing
>> images of
>> black people since the dawn of minstrelsy in the 19th century."

He's right.

>>
>> Rudy writes:
>>
>> I would like to believe that in 25 years we're going to look
>> back on our current treatment of many animals as cruel and
>> intolerable, and I do believe that the welfare of animals is
>> coming into focus as the next great social movement in this
>> country. Civil rights, feminism, gay and lesbian rights, and
>> the Latino movement have transformed American life for the
>> better.

All those "movements" have had a negative effect on the US.



I think that can--and should--happen for animals.

When you stop eating them or wearing them in your Gucci shoes lol Females
are all hypocrites. How many of them gave up diamonds when there was a
boycott against apartheid? Do you think they gave a damn about the negroes
who dug diamonds in the dangerous mines?



>>
>> But if the "hip-hop subculture" is the apogee of "black culture," why
>> should
>> we expect that this transformational movement of animals will produce
>> anything
>> better than a dog-eat-dog world?
>
> "Women's Studies", what a fucking joke. I'll bet Prof. Rudy is a muff-
> muncher and
> a skank to boot.
>
> ted
>
> Repeal the 19th amendment.
>
>
>

On Sep 2, 12:57 am, "Avenger" <aven...@avengers.co.uk> wrote:
> "Ted" <> Blame the cat women lol
>
>
Cat Women, Lady Le*bian, Hillary Clinton!

On Sep 1, 10:57 pm, "Avenger" <aven...@avengers.co.uk> wrote:
> "Ted" <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1188580736.801900.157030@g4g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>
> > On Aug 31, 9:45 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >> In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one Kathy Rudy, an associate
> >> professor of
> >> "women's studies" at Duke University, weighs in on, as the headline puts
> >> it,
> >> "White Culture's Hypocrisy About Vick." That would be Michael Vick, the
> >> erstwhile NFL player who pleaded guilty to conspiracy earlier this week
> >> in a
> >> case involving illegal dogfighting.
>
> It shows the stupidity of the lower classes. This Vick I imagine is some
> sort of football player earning a lot of money but yet he has to get
> involved in crap like dog fighting.

It's the same as Britney Spears, who for all her millions still shops
at Target and eats at McDonalds. IOW, you can take the kid out of the
ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the kid.

>
>
> >> Rudy, who is also an "ethicist," describes herself as "a strong advocate
> >> of
> >> animal welfare." Nonetheless, she says, "I find what's happening with
> >> Vick . .
> >> . alarming":
>
> >> We need to face the fact that dog fighting is not the only
> >> "sport" that abuses animals. Cruelty also occurs in rodeos,
> >> horse and dog racing
>
> It's not exactly the same and besides those sports are legal and regulated.
> If a horse brakes a leg there is a vet present to humanely destroy it.In
> boxing there is a referee to stop a fight if a boxer is injured and can't
> defend himself and there is a doctor present.
>
> (all of which mistreat animals and often
>
> >> kill them when no longer useful). There are also millions of
> >> dogs and cats
>
> Blame the cat women lol
>
> we put to death in "shelters"
>
> But it's done humanely and when there's no other choice.
>
> across the country
>
> >> because they lack a home, and billions of creatures we torture
> >> in factory farms for our food.
>
> I guess this bitch doesn't eat lol
>
>
>
> >> Vick treated his dogs very cruelly; there is no question about
> >> that. But I see one important difference between these more
> >> socially acceptable mistreatments and the anger focused on
> >> Vick: Vick is black, and most of the folks in charge of the
> >> other activities are white.
>
> And the comparison with other sports is ridiculous.
>
>
>
> >> Rudy then goes on to make the following distinction:
>
> >> While white middle and upper classes continue to watch horses
> >> run to the point of exhaustion and risk breaking their legs,
>
> I've been around many horse races and have never seen a horse injured or
> drop dead from exhaustion (yes it does occasionally happen). I have seen 2
> jockeys killed in the starting gate though. But I guess they were just
> little MEN so we won't mention that.
>
> >> they regard dogfighting as something that only low-class "thugs
> >> and drug dealers" find entertaining.
>
> Well it's true isn't it.
>
> Indeed, a reading of many
>
> >> of the Vick news stories indicts him and his friends as much
> >> for being involved in hip-hop subculture as for fighting dogs...
>
> >> I am not saying dogfighting is acceptable, but rather that
> >> Vick should be publicly criticized for that activity, not for
> >> his participation in hip-hop subculture. Whether or not dogs
> >> are fought more by minorities than white people is actually
> >> unknown,
>
> Most people would condemn it regardless of who's doing it.
>
> but the media representations of the last several
>
> >> weeks make it appear that black culture and dogfighting are
> >> inextricably intertwined. We need to find ways to condemn
> >> dogfighting without denigrating black culture with it.
>
> What's black culture?
>
>
>
> >> Huh? Denigrate means "to blacken," so Rudy is opposed to the blackening
> >> of
> >> black culture. That's the kind of intellectual rigor we've come to expect
> >> from
> >> the women's studies department at Duke.
>
> These girls are morons.
>
>
>
> >> But wait. Assuming she meant something like "disparaging" instead of
> >> "blackening," isn't she the one who's guilty of that? Blacks have far
> >> worthier
> >> contributions to America than the "hip-hop subculture" with its "thugs
> >> and
> >> drug dealers." It is patronizing at best, racist at worst, to equate
> >> "black
> >> culture" with what Stanley Crouch has called "the most dehumanizing
> >> images of
> >> black people since the dawn of minstrelsy in the 19th century."
>
> He's right.
>
>
>
> >> Rudy writes:
>
> >> I would like to believe that in 25 years we're going to look
> >> back on our current treatment of many animals as cruel and
> >> intolerable, and I do believe that the welfare of animals is
> >> coming into focus as the next great social movement in this
> >> country. Civil rights, feminism, gay and lesbian rights, and
> >> the Latino movement have transformed American life for the
> >> better.
>
> All those "movements" have had a negative effect on the US.
>
> I think that can--and should--happen for animals.
>
> When you stop eating them or wearing them in your Gucci shoes lol Females
> are all hypocrites. How many of them gave up diamonds when there was a
> boycott against apartheid? Do you think they gave a damn about the negroes
> who dug diamonds in the dangerous mines?
>
>
>
>
>
> >> But if the "hip-hop subculture" is the apogee of "black culture," why
> >> should
> >> we expect that this transformational movement of animals will produce
> >> anything
> >> better than a dog-eat-dog world?
>
> > "Women's Studies", what a fucking joke. I'll bet Prof. Rudy is a muff-
> > muncher and
> > a skank to boot.
>
> > ted
>
> > Repeal the 19th amendment.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On Aug 31, 10:18 am, Ted <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 31, 9:45 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one Kathy Rudy, an associate professor of
> > "women's studies" at Duke University, weighs in on, as the headline puts it,
> > "White Culture's Hypocrisy About Vick." That would be Michael Vick, the
> > erstwhile NFL player who pleaded guilty to conspiracy earlier this week in a
> > case involving illegal dogfighting.
>
> > Rudy, who is also an "ethicist," describes herself as "a strong advocate of
> > animal welfare." Nonetheless, she says, "I find what's happening with Vick . .
> > . alarming":
>
> > We need to face the fact that dog fighting is not the only
> > "sport" that abuses animals. Cruelty also occurs in rodeos,
> > horse and dog racing (all of which mistreat animals and often
> > kill them when no longer useful). There are also millions of
> > dogs and cats we put to death in "shelters" across the country
> > because they lack a home, and billions of creatures we torture
> > in factory farms for our food.
>
> > Vick treated his dogs very cruelly; there is no question about
> > that. But I see one important difference between these more
> > socially acceptable mistreatments and the anger focused on
> > Vick: Vick is black, and most of the folks in charge of the
> > other activities are white.
>
> > Rudy then goes on to make the following distinction:
>
> > While white middle and upper classes continue to watch horses
> > run to the point of exhaustion and risk breaking their legs,
> > they regard dogfighting as something that only low-class "thugs
> > and drug dealers" find entertaining. Indeed, a reading of many
> > of the Vick news stories indicts him and his friends as much
> > for being involved in hip-hop subculture as for fighting dogs...
>
> > I am not saying dogfighting is acceptable, but rather that
> > Vick should be publicly criticized for that activity, not for
> > his participation in hip-hop subculture. Whether or not dogs
> > are fought more by minorities than white people is actually
> > unknown, but the media representations of the last several
> > weeks make it appear that black culture and dogfighting are
> > inextricably intertwined. We need to find ways to condemn
> > dogfighting without denigrating black culture with it.
>
> > Huh? Denigrate means "to blacken," so Rudy is opposed to the blackening of
> > black culture. That's the kind of intellectual rigor we've come to expect from
> > the women's studies department at Duke.
>
> > But wait. Assuming she meant something like "disparaging" instead of
> > "blackening," isn't she the one who's guilty of that? Blacks have far worthier
> > contributions to America than the "hip-hop subculture" with its "thugs and
> > drug dealers." It is patronizing at best, racist at worst, to equate "black
> > culture" with what Stanley Crouch has called "the most dehumanizing images of
> > black people since the dawn of minstrelsy in the 19th century."
>
> > Rudy writes:
>
> > I would like to believe that in 25 years we're going to look
> > back on our current treatment of many animals as cruel and
> > intolerable, and I do believe that the welfare of animals is
> > coming into focus as the next great social movement in this
> > country. Civil rights, feminism, gay and lesbian rights, and
> > the Latino movement have transformed American life for the
> > better. I think that can--and should--happen for animals.
>
> > But if the "hip-hop subculture" is the apogee of "black culture," why should
> > we expect that this transformational movement of animals will produce anything
> > better than a dog-eat-dog world?
>
> "Women's Studies", what a fucking joke. I'll bet Prof. Rudy is a muff-
> muncher and
> a skank to boot.

http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/duk...005/depqa.html

"Stinky" <awleclair@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189100206.723395.101930@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> On Sep 1, 10:57 pm, "Avenger" <aven...@avengers.co.uk> wrote:
>> "Ted" <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>
> It's the same as Britney Spears, who for all her millions still shops
> at Target and eats at McDonalds. IOW, you can take the kid out of the
> ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the kid.


why don't you ponder for a while on that statement , until you realize how
inane it and you are,

come back if you're willing to admit how ignorant you are, and have it
splained to ya boy

On Sep 7, 11:12 pm, "Al E. Gator" <ho...@yahoo.net> wrote:
> "Stinky" <awlecl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1189100206.723395.101930@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
>
> > On Sep 1, 10:57 pm, "Avenger" <aven...@avengers.co.uk> wrote:
> >> "Ted" <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > It's the same as Britney Spears, who for all her millions still shops
> > at Target and eats at McDonalds. IOW, you can take the kid out of the
> > ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the kid.
>
> why don't you ponder for a while on that statement , until you realize how
> inane it and you are,
>
> come back if you're willing to admit how ignorant you are, and have it
> splained to ya boy

How about you suck your own cock. Oh, sorry, it's too small even if
you did surgically remove your ribs.

"frybread" <great_frybread_king@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1189918353.550485.254970@n39g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
> On Sep 7, 11:12 pm, "Al E. Gator" <ho...@yahoo.net> wrote:
>> "Stinky" <awlecl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1189100206.723395.101930@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
>>
>> > On Sep 1, 10:57 pm, "Avenger" <aven...@avengers.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> "Ted" <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > It's the same as Britney Spears, who for all her millions still shops
>> > at Target and eats at McDonalds. IOW, you can take the kid out of the
>> > ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the kid.
>>
>> why don't you ponder for a while on that statement , until you realize
>> how
>> inane it and you are,
>>
>> come back if you're willing to admit how ignorant you are, and have it
>> splained to ya boy
>
> How about you suck your own cock. Oh, sorry, it's too small even if
> you did surgically remove your ribs.


another conservative republicon with only one thing on his perverted mind

sucking dick

"Al E. Gator" <> another conservative republicon with only one thing on his
perverted mind, sucking dick
>
>
Apparently they all read about it in Mein Kampf. Just like the Republicans,
the Nazi Party had a whole bunch of closet homosexuals at the top.