Re: 'All men are equal': On such grotesque premises, the world(dis)order is based - typical juridical insanity

On Feb 6, 3:04*am, "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"
<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:
> *Message and author protected by the 1st amendment (free speech) and similar
> constitutional provisions. Violations of this provision through actions by
> judiciary and other government criminals will be prosecuted as soon as
> conditions permit.*
>
> If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build something
> reasonable on it?!
>
Negroes can jump higher.

"Down in the jungle,
Where coconuts grow.
Lived an old negro,
Named Uncle Joe.

He could do the hucklebuck,
And the hoop de do.
Cool muthafucker,
Wear Florsheim shoe."

Robert Frost (unpublished)

On Feb 6, 4:13*am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 3:04*am, "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:

> > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build something
> > reasonable on it?!

The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
statement of belief in racial equality.

"Temple Orfice" aka Krusty wrote:
....
> The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> statement of belief in racial equality.

It was written by a man that was having sex with blacks...
I mean, he should know, right?
__
Steve
..

On Feb 6, 6:52*am, "Stephen Cowell" <stephenleeNOSPAMcow...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "Temple Orfice" aka Krusty wrote:

Google actually translated those Japanese characters as "temple
office."

> > The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> > Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> > English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> > statement of belief in racial equality.
>
> It was written by a man that was having sex with blacks...
> I mean, he should know, right?

Thomas Jefferson never freed his slaves, even though they were his
*family*, his *blood relatives*.

Somebody once noted that, at the Jefferson Memorial, the statue of TJ
has its back turned to his statement that "something should be done
about this people."

"Temple Offal" <broagancrackbreath@yahoo.com> wrote
> On Feb 6, 6:52 am, "Stephen Cowell" wrote:
> > "Temple Orfice" aka Krusty wrote:
>
> Google actually translated those Japanese characters as "temple
> office."

Ogee... I wonder how that happened? Oh well...

> > > The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> > > Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> > > English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> > > statement of belief in racial equality.
> >
> > It was written by a man that was having sex with blacks...
> > I mean, he should know, right?
>
> Thomas Jefferson never freed his slaves, even though they were his
> *family*, his *blood relatives*.

How can you *consistantly* be *such* a *font* of
misinformation... you're doing it on purpose, right?

http://www.monticello.org/plantation...on_contro.html

"Thomas Jefferson freed all of Sally Hemings'
children: Beverly and Harriet were allowed to
leave Monticello in 1822; Madison and Eston were
released in Jefferson's 1826 will."

There's no other way... I mean, you're like *sick*
consistant on this...
__
Steve
..

On Feb 6, 5:13*am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:

Naturally you are correct. People like you are inferior to everybody
else on the planet, man or woman, brown, yellow, white etc. YOU and
those like you are inferior to everyone else on the planet. But don't
worry, we'll be rounding you up shortly and after a quick shower
you'll be shipped to nation where you can live free from opression by
your superiors.

8^)

On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:23:18 -0800, 府寺 wrote:

> On Feb 6, 6:52Â*am, "Stephen Cowell" <stephenleeNOSPAMcow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> "Temple Orfice" aka Krusty wrote:
>
> Google actually translated those Japanese characters as "temple office."
>
>> > The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
>> > Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
>> > English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
>> > statement of belief in racial equality.
>>
>> It was written by a man that was having sex with blacks... I mean, he
>> should know, right?
>
> Thomas Jefferson never freed his slaves, even though they were his
> *family*, his *blood relatives*.

Jefferson attempted to free his slaves - and everyone else's, in
Viriginia and in all the colonies - during his political career.

His wikipedia entry claims (with a footnoted reference to a biographical
source) that his slaves were encumbered with his property mortgage and he
wasn't able to free them while the debt stood - which it did, until his
death.



>
> Somebody once noted that, at the Jefferson Memorial, the statue of TJ
> has its back turned to his statement that "something should be done
> about this people."

On Feb 6, 8:42*am, "The Last Neanderthal speaks"
<stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Naturally you are correct.

Of course blond-haired, blue-eyed White people are correct. The
advanced state of technology and civilization are a result of a
mutation that occurred 6,000 to 10,000 years ago and the high
intelligence and enhanced fertility (in part due to the sexual
desireablity of blonde-haired, blue-eyed women) resulted in a dramtic
increase in population and advances in technology.

But don't worry, Mr. Last Neanderthal. White people will eventually
catch you and put you in a zoo and provide you with a female
chimpanzee for company.

On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:
> > > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build something
> > > reasonable on it?!
>
> The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> statement of belief in racial equality.

It must really piss you guys off that "created equal" gets so
mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding,
I bet you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded
by friends, admirers and loved ones.

Poor baby.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:54:09 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

> On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn
>> > eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:
>> > > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build
>> > > something reasonable on it?!
>>
>> The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
>> Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
>> English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
>> statement of belief in racial equality.
>
> It must really piss you guys off that "created equal" gets so
> mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding, I bet
> you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded by friends, admirers
> and loved ones.
>
> Poor baby.

Has it been pointed out that in early revisions of the Declaration, the
slave trade was mentioned as one of the transgressions of George III?

On Feb 8, 11:08 am, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:54:09 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn
> >> > eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:
> >> > > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build
> >> > > something reasonable on it?!
>
> >> The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> >> Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> >> English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> >> statement of belief in racial equality.
>
> > It must really piss you guys off that "created equal" gets so
> > mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding, I bet
> > you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded by friends, admirers
> > and loved ones.
>
> > Poor baby.
>
> Has it been pointed out that in early revisions of the Declaration, the
> slave trade was mentioned as one of the transgressions of George III?

You do realize that continuing this discussion with this
pair of trolls is kind of like throwing a stick for a Labrador
Retriever.

No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be
back, wagging his tail and ready to play some more.
You're not real likely to tire them out.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:25:51 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

> On Feb 8, 11:08 am, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:54:09 -0800, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
>> > On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn
>> >> > eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your.earliest.conv> wrote:
>> >> > > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build
>> >> > > something reasonable on it?!
>>
>> >> The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
>> >> Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
>> >> English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
>> >> statement of belief in racial equality.
>>
>> > It must really piss you guys off that "created equal" gets so
>> > mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding, I bet
>> > you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded by friends,
>> > admirers and loved ones.
>>
>> > Poor baby.
>>
>> Has it been pointed out that in early revisions of the Declaration, the
>> slave trade was mentioned as one of the transgressions of George III?
>
> You do realize that continuing this discussion with this pair of trolls
> is kind of like throwing a stick for a Labrador Retriever.
>
> No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be back, wagging his
> tail and ready to play some more. You're not real likely to tire them
> out.

Well, if they're that dopey I'd just stop replying.

On Feb 8, 11:54Â*am, Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 5:10 am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 6, 4:13 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 6, 3:04 am, "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"<nuke.islamis...@your..earliest.conv> wrote:
> > > > If already the basis is wrong, how do you then want to build something
> > > > reasonable on it?!
>
> > The "all men are created equal" phrase in the US Declaration of
> > Independence was intended to refer to the lack of representation of
> > English colonists in parliament, it was never intended to be a
> > statement of belief in racial equality.
>
> It must really piss you guys off that "created equal" gets so
> mis-applied. Why if it wasn't for that stupid misunderstanding,
> I bet you guys would be successful, happy and surrounded
> by friends, admirers and loved ones.

Such beautiful sarchasm...shame he isn't intelligent nor well bred
enough to get it.

On Feb 8, 7:54Â*am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 8:42Â*am, "The Last Neanderthal speaks"
>
> <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Naturally you are correct.
>
> Of course blond-haired, blue-eyed White people are correct. The
> advanced state of technology and civilization are a result of a
> mutation that occurred 6,000 to 10,000 years ago and the high
> intelligence and enhanced fertility (in part due to the sexual
> desireablity of blonde-haired, blue-eyed women) resulted in a dramtic
> increase in population and advances in technology.
>
> But don't worry, Mr. Last Neanderthal. White people will eventually
> catch you and put you in a zoo and provide you with a female
> chimpanzee for company.

ROTFLMA thanky for PROVING what delusioan liar and devaint personality
you have...to everyone not on rec.motorcycles.

"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote
> You do realize that continuing this discussion with this
> pair of trolls is kind of like throwing a stick for a Labrador
> Retriever.
>
> No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be
> back, wagging his tail and ready to play some more.
> You're not real likely to tire them out.

Oh, no.... he got pretty tired with me, pretty quick.
__
Steve
..

On Feb 8, 7:14*pm, "Stephen Cowell" <stephenleeNOSPAMcow...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote

> > No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be
> > back, wagging his tail and ready to play some more.
> > You're not real likely to tire them out.
>
> Oh, no.... he got pretty tired with me, pretty quick.

Neither one of you gentlemen understand the object of this game.

On Feb 9, 7:54Â*am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 7:14Â*pm, "Stephen Cowell" <stephenleeNOSPAMcow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > "Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote
> > > No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be
> > > back, wagging his tail and ready to play some more.
> > > You're not real likely to tire them out.
>
> > Oh, no.... he got pretty tired with me, pretty quick.
>
> Neither one of you gentlemen understand the object of this game.

who said it's a game? maybe some here want you so po'd you die from a
stroke or heart attack, maybe some of them want you so angry you stalk
them and actually show up IRL...

there are games and there are games and then there is reality,
something you've never been in touch with.

On Feb 9, 6:54Â*am, 府寺 <breoganmacbr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 7:14Â*pm, "Stephen Cowell" <stephenleeNOSPAMcow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > "Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote
> > > No matter how long you choose persist, Bozo will be
> > > back, wagging his tail and ready to play some more.
> > > You're not real likely to tire them out.
>
> > Oh, no.... he got pretty tired with me, pretty quick.
>
> Neither one of you gentlemen understand the object of this game.

I'm sure the Labrador retriever feels the same way.