Re: For Andrzej: Power Curl!

Steve Freides wrote:
> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
> newsiaai2dbegb0inqdl364k5idvjgga5q3ag@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:41:41 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
>> <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dnia 2006-10-05 Charles napisa³(a):
>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:30:14 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
>>>> <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you should trial it yourself and you will then know what
>>>>>> I mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did. Actually I will do a one handed version within minutes.
>>>>> Artur
>>>>> Saxon called it a clean pull to the shoulders. Good to know that
>>>>> both
>>>>> he and me are equally wrong (at least we are equal at something).
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Given that Artur decomposed many years ago,
>>>
>>> But his record lift still holds, you know?
>>>
>>>> it's not surprising that he got it wrong again,
>>>
>>> I got the same feeling. I opt toward squat clean for one handed
>>> lifts.
>>
>> I only opt for dumbbell lifts occasionally, and when I want to vary
>> my routine. However, a schedule of "one handed lifts" takes twice the
>> time that two handed lifts do, and is a very good reason for not
>> doing them, particularly if time is at a premium - which it almost
>> always is!
>
> One-somethinged lifts are worth your time, Charles, perhaps for a full
> cycle every now and then, even if it means you do less volume. Just
> do it for one or two lifts. See how you feel after a few weeks of
> heavy one-handed overhead presses (take your pick - mil press, side
> press, bent press). Try some one-legged work as well, e.g., deadlift
> this way. Nothing quite like it, and you'll find muscles you didn't
> know you even had.

But for what purpose?

>
> -S-
> http://www.kbnj.com
>
>
>>>
>>>> but there is really no excuse for you only
>>>> "equalling" Artur! ;o)
>>>
>>> Well, I wouldn't mind pressing one handed over 150 kg. You say I
>>> should be more ambitious?
>>
>> One can never be too ambitious, but under the circumstances (Artur
>> being dead etc.) you should be pulling more than he is currently
>> capable of doing, without too much effort!



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

Dnia 2006-10-05 Steve Freides napisa³(a):

> The purpose will best be understood if you do them. Standing one-armed
> exercises will hit the midsection in a way other things typically do
> not. One legged exercises have enormous benefits - how much of day to
> day life, or even sports, is performed standing on two legs or lying on
> a bench? Even running is done with one foot on the ground at a time for
> the most part. One-legged work tends to hit muscles that two-legged
> versions don't, e.g., the one-legged deadlift will hit things in the
> side of the butt and also the hip flexors. Same for one-legged squats
> Standing presses done on one leg are very challenging and very good for
> ankle and kneed stability.

From what I'm experiencing, I have to say that carry-over to real life
exhibits of strength is surprisingly high. I'm often asked to carry
something heavy from one place to other. It often involves picking
something from ground level, shouldering it and carrying it upstairs,
or something of this kind.

Unilateral lifting does help with that.

> I don't think one-sided work is necessarily the ideal thing if
> hypertrophy is your goal because you cannot handle as much weight,

Well, but you can handle one-limbed more than 50% of your two-limbed
lift, so overall load is higher. I see no reason why this should lead
to lower hypertrophy.

> but
> for sports, for general fitness purposes, for martial artists, and the
> like, having some in your program is a good thing, IMHO.

Weightlifters have one-legged lifts in their program. They can't be
bad lifts. I heard that there is no better quad builder than Bulgarian
split squat and that there is no better overall leg builder than heavy
step-up.

At worst they work fine, at best they work great and save your spine.

--
Andrzej Rosa

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:14:46 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
<bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:

>BTW - I don't buy this swiss balls too, both literally and figuratively.

I saw a girl doing some weird things with one of them at the gym the
other day. She had the ball between her back and the wall and was
squatting with dumbbells in hand. But then when she put her chest to
the ground and moved her legs in and out on the ball it became quite
distracting. She was in what I would call a wheel barrel position
rolling back and forth.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:14:46 +0000 (UTC), Andrzej Rosa
><bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>BTW - I don't buy this swiss balls too, both literally and figuratively.
>
>I saw a girl doing some weird things with one of them at the gym the
>other day. She had the ball between her back and the wall and was
>squatting with dumbbells in hand.

That's called a ball squat. It's fairly effective, particularly for
the quads.

>But then when she put her chest to
>the ground and moved her legs in and out on the ball it became quite
>distracting. She was in what I would call a wheel barrel position
>rolling back and forth.

You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:03:08 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>>But then when she put her chest to
>>the ground and moved her legs in and out on the ball it became quite
>>distracting. She was in what I would call a wheel barrel position
>>rolling back and forth.
>
>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?

I have never seen it spelled that way before. Here is a picture:
http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...2610-5904.html

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:03:08 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>>But then when she put her chest to
>>>the ground and moved her legs in and out on the ball it became quite
>>>distracting. She was in what I would call a wheel barrel position
>>>rolling back and forth.
>>
>>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?
>
>I have never seen it spelled that way before. Here is a picture:
>http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...2610-5904.html

Are you a liar or just illiterate?

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/inde...?date=19960725

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:36:01 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>Are you a liar or just illiterate?
>
>http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/inde...?date=19960725

Do a search then. If so there are hundreds of web sites out there
also illiterate. Here is a more precise definition if you lack
imagination:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...m=wheel+barrel

John Williams wrote:
> Shute wrote:
> >JMW wrote:
[...]

> >>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?
> >
> >I have never seen it spelled that way before. <snip>

Shute described a wheel barrel (or wheelbarrow) position clearly in his
initial post, so what was the purpose of /your/ post, John Williams?
Regardless of your purpose, you replied with your question above to
which, yeah, Shute answered with a statement. The image supplied by
Shute (snipped) may have been overkill, but it simply supported Shute's
comment.

And then comes your reaction:

> Are you a liar or just illiterate? <snip>

Childish at best. Actually I'm being unfair to children by making that
comment. You're an adult who behaves poorly, rudely, argumentatively.
Pot, kettle, black? What the heck, I'll plead guilty.

(kicks dirt)

But Cohen started it!!! Cohen STARTED it!!!!

(fondly recalls dagnabit versus dadnabit)

Plus wheel barrel "wins" by 2,120,000 results. Neener, neener, etc.!

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,200,000 for wheelbarrow.
Results 1 - 10 of about 4,320,000 for wheel barrel.

I'd say you're more the liar as well as possibly illiterate, John
Williams, as it seems incredible to believe that you can't entertain
the ideas that a) people can be honest, b) people don't typically spell
words out in their heads as they hear them, or c) people can call items
by different names based on their location, culture, experience, etc.

I went to the cafeteria or mess hall while stationed at Fort Benjamin
Harrison in Indiana. Another service member and I were talking as we
pushed our trays along and I mentioned somethingsomething (after nearly
25 years I don't remember the specific conversation) about a grapefruit
spritzing. The person turned to me and exclaimed something like,
"Spritz? It's spray!" They had never heard the word spritz before. I
took it good naturedly and called them neither a liar nor illiterate.
Spray is more widely used throughout the United States, I suspect,
however spritz is the norm in Lancaster County, PA.

Do they say sack and pop in Ohio? How about tote or bag and soda or
cola?

Liar or just illiterate? Nah. Williams, you might just be grumpy and
inconsiderate. ;o)

Hth.

--
Curt <--- real name
http://curtjames.com/ <--- real non pop fitness website

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:36:01 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>Are you a liar or just illiterate?
>>
>>http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/inde...?date=19960725
>
>Do a search then. If so there are hundreds of web sites out there
>also illiterate.

No shit, Sherlock. Unbridled stupidity runs rampant on the World Wide
Web. You're probably one of those who say "pacific" instead of
"specific," and frequently use the word "irregardless."

>Here is a more precise definition if you lack
>imagination:
>
>http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...m=wheel+barrel

You have to go to a slang dictionary to support your spelling? Do you
have any idea how pathetic that is?

"Curt James" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
> John Williams wrote:
>> Shute wrote:
>> >JMW wrote:
> [...]
>
>> >>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?
>> >
>> >I have never seen it spelled that way before. <snip>
>
> Shute described a wheel barrel (or wheelbarrow) position clearly in his
> initial post, so what was the purpose of /your/ post, John Williams?
> Regardless of your purpose, you replied with your question above to
> which, yeah, Shute answered with a statement. The image supplied by
> Shute (snipped) may have been overkill, but it simply supported Shute's
> comment.
>
> And then comes your reaction:
>
>> Are you a liar or just illiterate? <snip>
>
> Childish at best. Actually I'm being unfair to children by making that
> comment. You're an adult who behaves poorly, rudely, argumentatively.
> Pot, kettle, black? What the heck, I'll plead guilty.

I'm still trying to wrap my little brain around the fact that
you...YOU...are criticizing somebody for a spelling flame!

> (kicks dirt)
>
> But Cohen started it!!! Cohen STARTED it!!!!

I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way.

David

In article <YcbWg.4623$Lv3.2261@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

> I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way.
>
> David

Nice quote Mr. Rabbit...... ;-)
--
Peace, Om

Remove extra . to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

John Williams wrote:
> Shute wrote:
> >JMW wrote:
> >
> >>Are you a liar or just illiterate?

<snip> (see below)

> >Do a search then. If so there are hundreds of web sites out there
> >also illiterate.
>
> No shit, Sherlock.

Again with the 1970s! Could you update to the '90s at least?

> Unbridled stupidity runs rampant on the World Wide Web.

And here you are by way of example? ;o)

> You're probably one of those who say "pacific" instead of
> "specific," and frequently use the word "irregardless."

Trips you up each and every time, pal. Telling someone they're sToOpit
only gives you an opportunity to look like a fool.

Irregardless:

"The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such
word." There is such a word, however."

There is such a word, however.

"It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from
time to time in edited prose." See m-w.com's definition of irregardless
for more.

And although Merriam-Webster recommends regardless, they offer
irregardless as a word.

Likewise supposably. I didn't believe that was a word, however m-w.com
offers a definition.

Regardless (heh), you didn't specifically state that irregardless
wasn't a word. Good thing. However your inability to recognize that
language is everchanging and evolving is what I would call a weakness
on your part.

[...]

re http://www.urbandictionary.com/

> You have to go to a slang dictionary to support your spelling?
> Do you have any idea how pathetic that is?

Not pathetic, but a strength. Where do you think neologists and
lexicographers visit? No contact with slang and those who use it?

http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~ling215/NewWords/index.html

Or to use your apparently preferred source:

http://www.randomhouse.com/words/newwords/

And re using the following link to prove Shute illiterate...

> >>http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/inde...?date=19960725

did you read the entire text there? It includes:

For example, the word bridegroom was originally something like
bridegome, the second element being the Old English word for 'man'.
When "gome" fell out of use, "bridegome" was changed to "bridegroom" on
the analogy of the common and familiar word "groom," which is at least
a plausible substitute.
/copy and paste from wotd

I suppose you still use bridegome?

Words change. New words come into being. And common use often becomes
the "correct" use.

Welcome to Earth, John Williams. Kindly update your mindset. You'll
thank me for it. ;o)

--
Curt

Cohen wrote:
> "Curt James" wrote
> > John Williams wrote:
> >> Shute wrote:
> >> >JMW wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> >>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?
> >> >
> >> >I have never seen it spelled that way before. <snip>
> >
> > Shute described a wheel barrel (or wheelbarrow) position clearly in his
> > initial post, so what was the purpose of /your/ post, John Williams?
> > Regardless of your purpose, you replied with your question above to
> > which, yeah, Shute answered with a statement. The image supplied by
> > Shute (snipped) may have been overkill, but it simply supported Shute's
> > comment.
> >
> > And then comes your reaction:
> >
> >> Are you a liar or just illiterate? <snip>
> >
> > Childish at best. Actually I'm being unfair to children by making that
> > comment. You're an adult who behaves poorly, rudely, argumentatively.
> > Pot, kettle, black? What the heck, I'll plead guilty.
>
> I'm still trying to wrap my little brain

Oh, don't be modest. You're a BIG brain!

> around the fact that you...YOU...are criticizing somebody for a spelling
> flame!

IT'S WILLIAMS FER GAWD'S SAKE! WILLIAMS!

Seriously, if you want to get technical, Shute was guilty of a speeling
flam, two. ;o)

My criticism of Williams had its focus more on the whole adult who
behaves poorly, rudely, argumentatively tone than on the correct
spelling component.

> > (kicks dirt)
> >
> > But Cohen started it!!! Cohen STARTED it!!!!
>
> I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way.

See? BIG brain.

> David

--
Curt

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>"Curt James" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote
>> John Williams wrote:
>>> Shute wrote:
>>> >JMW wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> >>You mean a "wheelbarrow position"?
>>> >
>>> >I have never seen it spelled that way before. <snip>
>>
>> Shute described a wheel barrel (or wheelbarrow) position clearly in his
>> initial post, so what was the purpose of /your/ post, John Williams?
>> Regardless of your purpose, you replied with your question above to
>> which, yeah, Shute answered with a statement. The image supplied by
>> Shute (snipped) may have been overkill, but it simply supported Shute's
>> comment.
>>
>> And then comes your reaction:
>>
>>> Are you a liar or just illiterate? <snip>
>>
>> Childish at best. Actually I'm being unfair to children by making that
>> comment. You're an adult who behaves poorly, rudely, argumentatively.
>> Pot, kettle, black? What the heck, I'll plead guilty.
>
>I'm still trying to wrap my little brain around the fact that
>you...YOU...are criticizing somebody for a spelling flame!

Curt, as always, is a twat. If Shite was one of Curt's "enemies,"
Curt would have been the very first to jump in on that one.

But, as I said, Curt is a twat.

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:29:28 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>No shit, Sherlock. Unbridled stupidity runs rampant on the World Wide
>Web. You're probably one of those who say "pacific" instead of
>"specific," and frequently use the word "irregardless."

And you are expecting more from the newsgroups?

>You have to go to a slang dictionary to support your spelling? Do you
>have any idea how pathetic that is?


Here a few slang dictionaries from my area:
http://www.bostonslang.terrisnook.com/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_slang

I didn't realize fluffernutter was a regional word.

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 14:37:42 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>Curt, as always, is a twat. If Shite was one of Curt's "enemies,"
>Curt would have been the very first to jump in on that one.
>
>But, as I said, Curt is a twat.

So is that spelling my name wrong on purpose, or are you just trying
to be an idiot? I know that you could NEVER make a spelling mistake.

John Williams wrote:
[...]

> Curt, as always, is a twat.

heh

Who says twat anymore? No one. Okay, you, Williams, yeah, but that's
it.

I picture you in your car, talking to yourself as you drive along some
back road in Ohio...

John Williams: "Man, that guy is such a twat. Don't you agree he's a
twat? Oh, yeah. No shit, Sherlock! But, as I said, Curt is a twat."

Or perhaps it's London day and you're going with your cockney self:

"Curt is such a wanker! What an arse! But, as I said, Curt is a
wanker."

> If Shite

Well, aren't you the cutest thing? Please leave the attempts at wit to
those what got some, eh? Tia.

> was one of Curt's "enemies," Curt would have been the very first
> to jump in on that one.

And here's evidence that you don't understand me at all. I have sppel
flamd those I like as much as those you perceive as my enemies. I
simply add a smiley face. And, yeah, some people have thicker skin.
Grow some. I'm sure there's something in PubMed that will help, 'kay?

> But, as I said, Curt is a twat.

You're all about the one-syllable t words, aren't you?

Good luck with that.

--
Curt

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:29:28 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>No shit, Sherlock. Unbridled stupidity runs rampant on the World Wide
>>Web. You're probably one of those who say "pacific" instead of
>>"specific," and frequently use the word "irregardless."
>
>And you are expecting more from the newsgroups?
>
>>You have to go to a slang dictionary to support your spelling? Do you
>>have any idea how pathetic that is?
>
>
>Here a few slang dictionaries from my area:
>http://www.bostonslang.terrisnook.com/index.html
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_slang
>
>I didn't realize fluffernutter was a regional word.

We spell "Wooster" the way it sounds.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 14:37:42 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>Curt, as always, is a twat. If Shite was one of Curt's "enemies,"
>>Curt would have been the very first to jump in on that one.
>>
>>But, as I said, Curt is a twat.
>
>So is that spelling my name wrong on purpose, or are you just trying
>to be an idiot? I know that you could NEVER make a spelling mistake.

[a] You told Rob Schuh that wasn't your real name. So I guess it can
be spelled any way one wants, yes?

[b] If not a real name, is it also a misspelling of "Shoot" or
"Chute"?

[c] I like my creative spelling.

John Williams wrote:
[...]

> [a] You told Rob Schuh that wasn't your real name. So I guess it can
> be spelled any way one wants, yes?
>
> [b] If not a real name, is it also a misspelling of "Shoot" or
> "Chute"?
>
> [c] I like my creative spelling.

[d] d is for dick.

Just sayin'.

--
Curt

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:53:25 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>[a] You told Rob Schuh that wasn't your real name. So I guess it can
>be spelled any way one wants, yes?

It isn't the name on my birth certificate but it is my name in this
newsgroup. Why is that so hard for some people to understand? People
really ought to take a crash course on Usenet before they come on here
spout of stupid things like this.

>[b] If not a real name, is it also a misspelling of "Shoot" or
>"Chute"?

Yeah it's a real name.

>[c] I like my creative spelling.

So when you spell something differently it's "creative", and when I do
I'm illiterate.

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:49:29 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>>Here a few slang dictionaries from my area:
>>http://www.bostonslang.terrisnook.com/index.html
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_slang
>>
>>I didn't realize fluffernutter was a regional word.
>
>We spell "Wooster" the way it sounds.

Well for clarification the first link spells them how they sound. The
actual words may be spelled differently. There used to be a better
link than those explaining it all. But they seem to have been taken
over by copy cats who updated things and call me an old geezer. I
don't care if the kids call em Boot cut Jeans, they are still Bell
Bottoms to me.

Any way the other pages clearly explain there are no R's in Boston
English.

Shute wrote:
[...]

> So when you spell something differently it's "creative",
> and when I do I'm illiterate.

Now you're catching on! It's called John Williams... /logic/. ;o)

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro#The_Bizarro_World

--
Curt

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:53:25 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>[a] You told Rob Schuh that wasn't your real name. So I guess it can
>>be spelled any way one wants, yes?
>
>It isn't the name on my birth certificate but it is my name in this
>newsgroup. Why is that so hard for some people to understand? People
>really ought to take a crash course on Usenet before they come on here
>spout of stupid things like this.

I've been posting in MFW for ten years. Schuh has been posting here
even longer. How long have you been posting here?

John Williams wrote:
[...]

> I've been posting in MFW for ten years. Schuh has
> been posting here even longer. How long have you
> been posting here?

So there's this sidewalk, see? A dog pooped on the sidewalk ten years
ago. You can see the poop. Dessicated, but still present. Even earlier
than that the dog pooped a previous load of poop. It's still there,
too. Recently, a man dropped a wallet on the sidewalk. There are three
crisp fifty dollar bills peeking out.

Okay, not a perfect parallel, but in some ways it's a fair comparison,
imo.

--
Curt

On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:55:30 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>>It isn't the name on my birth certificate but it is my name in this
>>newsgroup. Why is that so hard for some people to understand? People
>>really ought to take a crash course on Usenet before they come on here
>>spout of stupid things like this.
>
>I've been posting in MFW for ten years. Schuh has been posting here
>even longer. How long have you been posting here?

Well here is another Usenet lesson for you. There are over 100K
newsgroups.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:55:30 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>>It isn't the name on my birth certificate but it is my name in this
>>>newsgroup. Why is that so hard for some people to understand? People
>>>really ought to take a crash course on Usenet before they come on here
>>>spout of stupid things like this.
>>
>>I've been posting in MFW for ten years. Schuh has been posting here
>>even longer. How long have you been posting here?
>
>Well here is another Usenet lesson for you. There are over 100K
>newsgroups.

Yes. Maybe you could find another one more to your liking.

Curt James wrote:
> John Williams wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Curt, as always, is a twat.
>
> heh
>
> Who says twat anymore? No one. Okay, you, Williams, yeah, but that's
> it.

Actually, twat is one of the more effective swear words particularly a/ if
intoned correctly and b/ is preceded by a venomous "fucking".

>
[...]

Curt, do you put as much effort into your gym time as you do into your
trolling? If so, I really can't understand why you are not seeing better
results.


--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>Curt James wrote:
>> John Williams wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> Curt, as always, is a twat.
>>
>> heh
>>
>> Who says twat anymore? No one. Okay, you, Williams, yeah, but that's
>> it.
>
>Actually, twat is one of the more effective swear words particularly a/ if
>intoned correctly and b/ is preceded by a venomous "fucking".
>
>>
>[...]
>
>Curt, do you put as much effort into your gym time as you do into your
>trolling? If so, I really can't understand why you are not seeing better
>results.

<snick> Curt James: The Mr. Olympia of Trolling.

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:59:41 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

><snick> Curt James: The Mr. Olympia of Trolling.

Actually Curt just talks a lot. A troll incites or inflames others
into conversation like you did to me yesterday. Plus you got all that
shit up on your website to get people going. And lastly a troll goes
around calling others trolls, kind of like you do on your website.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:59:41 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>><snick> Curt James: The Mr. Olympia of Trolling.
>
>Actually Curt just talks a lot. A troll incites or inflames others
>into conversation like you did to me yesterday. Plus you got all that
>shit up on your website to get people going. And lastly a troll goes
>around calling others trolls, kind of like you do on your website.

Hmmm ... I don't think you answered my question from last night about
how long you had been around MFW. By my estimation, it's been less
than a month and a half. So I guess your expertise on who is and who
is not a troll is about the same quality as your expertise on the
on-topic subjects.

You and Curt should get along famously!

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:55:28 -0400, Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:59:41 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>><snick> Curt James: The Mr. Olympia of Trolling.
>
>Actually Curt just talks a lot. A troll incites or inflames others
>into conversation like you did to me yesterday. Plus you got all that
>shit up on your website to get people going. And lastly a troll goes
>around calling others trolls, kind of like you do on your website.
>

Spot on Shute, you don't need to have been here very long to work out
who the *real* "trolling" catalyst is.

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:20:45 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 02:59:41 -0400, JMW
>><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>
>>><snick> Curt James: The Mr. Olympia of Trolling.
>>
>>Actually Curt just talks a lot. A troll incites or inflames others
>>into conversation like you did to me yesterday. Plus you got all that
>>shit up on your website to get people going. And lastly a troll goes
>>around calling others trolls, kind of like you do on your website.
>
>Hmmm ... I don't think you answered my question from last night about
>how long you had been around MFW. By my estimation, it's been less
>than a month and a half. So I guess your expertise on who is and who
>is not a troll is about the same quality as your expertise on the
>on-topic subjects.

You don't need to have a gold watch for long service at MFW, to
acquire early recognition of who the *real* pains in the arse in the
Group are !

>
>You and Curt should get along famously!

That could make you have to work a lot harder, if the forces against
you increase in numbers again!

You will never learn will you?

Bully wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
> > John Williams wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> Curt, as always, is a twat.
> >
> > heh
> >
> > Who says twat anymore? No one. Okay, you, Williams,
> > yeah, but that's it.
>
> Actually, twat is one of the more effective swear words particularly
> a/ if intoned correctly and b/ is preceded by a venomous "fucking".

Ha! )

I'm sure you're right on both counts, Bully.

> [...]
>
> Curt, do you put as much effort into your gym time as you do into
> your trolling?

I'm no fan of the t word, however I suppose it works.

"TROLL, n. A person who sends messages to a Usenet newsgroup to incite
emotions and cause controversy. [Metaphorical extension of troll, a
supernatural creature (dwarf) that lives in a cave.]" From:
http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~ling215/NewWords/page3.html

Incite emotions? I'm not trying to put people to sleep. Cause
controversy? Hmm.

Controversy: a contentious speech act; a dispute where there is strong
disagreement; "they were involved in a violent argument" From:
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=controversy

Wrt Williams and Schuh, there is typically strong disagreement - from
my point of view - as they both often post things that just don't wash,
don't make sense, or are deliberately contentious themselves, so, I
suppose that part of the owlnet.rice.edu applies as well.

(shrugs)

Certainly posting lends itself to high volume "training," however I
would say that I do indeed put as much effort into my gym time as I do
into my... posting. Yes.

> If so, I really can't understand why you are not seeing
> better results.

heh

You're bucking for the October humor award, are you? )

> Bully
> Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

--
Curt

Shute wrote:
[...]

> Actually Curt just talks a lot.

Who, me??? I'm as quiet as a church mouse. ;o)

(snipped the accurate assessment, imo, of another mfw patron)

--
Curt

Bully wrote:

> Curt James wrote:
> > John Williams wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> Curt, as always, is a twat.
> >
> > heh
> >
> > Who says twat anymore? No one. Okay, you, Williams, yeah, but that's
> > it.
>
> Actually, twat is one of the more effective swear words particularly a/ if
> intoned correctly and b/ is preceded by a venomous "fucking".
>
> >
> [...]
>
> Curt, do you put as much effort into your gym time as you do into your
> trolling? If so, I really can't understand why you are not seeing better
> results.
>
> --
> Bully
> Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
>
> "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
> matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

Do you really think Curt goes to the gym? Doesn't he weigh about a buck
twenty? ;-)


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/