Re: We can depose a dictator but it's 'too hard' to deport a bunch of criminals on our own soil? Where's the RESOLVE?

On Jun 16, 3:29 pm, "johnny@." <johnny@.> wrote:
> SarcasticInk.com wrote:
> > Oh boo hoo. It's too hard to enforce our laws and deport the
> > criminals. We just can't do it - we're not up to the job. So, let
> > just make the problem go away for a few years and hand out amnesty.
>
> > I thought Bush was the decider. Where's that can-do attitude boys?
> > Time to admit you really are a bunch of pussies. Too weak to defend
> > the country against a third world invasion!
>
> > ANYBODY AGAINST AMNESTY '08
>
> Bush is the decider, he has decided not to enforce immigration laws.
>
> The first thing any sane president would have done after 9/11, would
> have been to stop 1,000,000 illegal aliens from sneaking into the United
> States each year, from Mexico.
>
> Terrorists have had six and a half years to enter the United States from
> Mexico, so they are here right now. That's not good enough for Bush, so
> now he has to provide a way for them to get nuclear bombs into the
> United States, and to deliver them to any city in the country. He has
> done this by commanding the Department of Transportation to start a
> pilot program, that will allow 100 Mexican trucking companies complete
> access to the roads of the United States.
>
> --
> Tom Tancredo for President in 2008
> For a Secure Americahttp://www.teamtancredo.org/http://tancredo.house.gov/