Re: At What Point Do We Pull the Guns Off the Rack?

On May 23, 3:13 pm, Ranger <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:
> Tuesday, May 22, 2007
>
> At What Point Do We Pull the Guns Off the Rack?
>
> By Curt Maynard
>
> USA Today[1] is reporting that the Senate's immigration deal pleases
> few. No kidding? What, I need a mainstream publication to tell me
> that? I don't think so. I can tell the reader without any hesitation
> whatsoever that the Senate's immigration deal pleases almost nobody
> with the exception of the 20 million illegal aliens here in the United
> States at present and a few million Jews and ultra-liberal leftists on
> the east coast.
>
> Don't be fooled by the US governments attempts to convince you through
> the Zionist media that Democrats want this or want that, or Republican
> moderates favor the deal, or that liberals see it this way, or
> conservatives see it that way, the government is lying and they're
> using the media to shovel this crap down your throat.
>
> Illegal immigration and whether or not to send the 20 million illegals
> in this country packing is one of very few bipartisan issues that
> nearly everyone, Black, White Hispanic, or Asian can agree on today.
> NO AMNESTY! No amnesty OR anything that smells like amnesty, these
> people must leave, one way or another and if our Congressional
> representatives can't or won't make that happen, we have a duty, an
> obligation, to our children, grandchildren, and those of our neighbors
> to make them!
>
> When do we take our guns off the rack, oil them up, and head to
> Washington DC? That's really the question isn't it? We do have a right
> to do so you know, in fact, that is the very purpose of the Second
> Amendment, something our government has been actively trying to take
> away from us or at least reinterpret so as to disarm the American
> people.
>
> The definition of treason is relatively clear, especially as it
> applies to anyone that has taken an oath swearing allegiance to the
> United States Constitution, which clearly states that the oath taker
> swears to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign AND
> domestic. One definition is vague enough to include dissidents like
> myself IF one reads it as is, rather than considers what it really
> states and that is that treason is "a crime that undermines the
> offender's government." I certainly am not in favor of our present
> government and won't support it or anything it seeks to do until it
> [this is important] recognizes the authority of the American people,
> the true owners of this government. Theoretically, our politicians are
> suppose to represent us the American people, when they stop
> representing what we the people want they need to either leave office
> voluntarily or be thrown out.
>
> The legal definition of treason as defined by Merriam Webster is
> simply a "betrayal of trust." Now if the current representatives of
> this government aren't guilty of treason as defined by Merriam Webster
> I don't know what to say, they [Democrats and Republicans] have done
> nothing but lie, deceive, subvert, coerce, threaten, and betray our
> trust since 9-11. They have already engaged in treason and many of
> them know it, that is why you see so many of them completely selling
> out at present, selling their corrupt souls and votes to the hidden
> elite - the true rulers of the United States of America, who by the
> way do not represent the American people.
>
> Am I saying that George Bush is a traitor? Damn right I am. I'm also
> accusing the following Senators of High Treason, each one of them
> voted to give amnesty to the 20 million illegal invaders presently
> squatting on American soil and not one of them can or ever will
> attempt to prove that the majority of their constituents [The people
> that elected these people to represent THEM] approve of any form of
> amnesty or forgiveness of the illegal aliens in their midst, not one.
> Thus, it's really simple no? These Senators are NOT representing those
> that voted for them - they are however, representing something or
> someone else.
>
> continuedhttp://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/05/at-what-point-do-we-pull-...

<theodoric3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1179965545.888283.6390@x18g2000prd.googlegrou ps.com...
> On May 23, 3:13 pm, Ranger <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:
>> Tuesday, May 22, 2007
>>
>> At What Point Do We Pull the Guns Off the Rack?
>>


I got my trusty Kimber 45 Auto and my DPMS Panther .308 ready.

<

In article <1179965545.888283.6390@x18g2000prd.googlegroups.c om>,
theodoric3@lycos.com wrote:

> On May 23, 3:13 pm, Ranger <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:
> > Tuesday, May 22, 2007
> >
> > At What Point Do We Pull the Guns Off the Rack?
> >
> > By Curt Maynard
> >
> > USA Today[1] is reporting that the Senate's immigration deal pleases
> > few. No kidding? What, I need a mainstream publication to tell me
> > that? I don't think so. I can tell the reader without any hesitation
> > whatsoever that the Senate's immigration deal pleases almost nobody
> > with the exception of the 20 million illegal aliens here in the United
> > States at present and a few million Jews and ultra-liberal leftists on
> > the east coast.
> >
> > Don't be fooled by the US governments attempts to convince you through
> > the Zionist media

The second I see terms like "zionest media" I know we are dealing witha
complete nut cracker and lose all interest. Guns good, nut crackers not so
good.

--
Will @ www.BrinkZone.com

"It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

What I find hilarious about WASP patriots is that they don't seem to
realize how heavily hispanic the U.S. military is! And speaking of
Jewish media power, I also find it funny how several media
personalities are now hispanic, such that you have hispanic
journalists covering the immigration debates -- LOL!!!



On May 23, 8:12 pm, theodor...@lycos.com wrote:
> On May 23, 3:13 pm, Ranger <zx034blas...@bazooka.e4ward.com> wrote:
>
> > Tuesday, May 22, 2007
>
> > At What Point Do We Pull the Guns Off the Rack?
>
> > By Curt Maynard
>
> > USA Today[1] is reporting that the Senate's immigration deal pleases
> > few. No kidding? What, I need a mainstream publication to tell me
> > that? I don't think so. I can tell the reader without any hesitation
> > whatsoever that the Senate's immigration deal pleases almost nobody
> > with the exception of the 20 million illegal aliens here in the United
> > States at present and a few million Jews and ultra-liberal leftists on
> > the east coast.
>
> > Don't be fooled by the US governments attempts to convince you through
> > the Zionist media that Democrats want this or want that, or Republican
> > moderates favor the deal, or that liberals see it this way, or
> > conservatives see it that way, the government is lying and they're
> > using the media to shovel this crap down your throat.
>
> > Illegal immigration and whether or not to send the 20 million illegals
> > in this country packing is one of very few bipartisan issues that
> > nearly everyone, Black, White Hispanic, or Asian can agree on today.
> > NO AMNESTY! No amnesty OR anything that smells like amnesty, these
> > people must leave, one way or another and if our Congressional
> > representatives can't or won't make that happen, we have a duty, an
> > obligation, to our children, grandchildren, and those of our neighbors
> > to make them!
>
> > When do we take our guns off the rack, oil them up, and head to
> > Washington DC? That's really the question isn't it? We do have a right
> > to do so you know, in fact, that is the very purpose of the Second
> > Amendment, something our government has been actively trying to take
> > away from us or at least reinterpret so as to disarm the American
> > people.
>
> > The definition of treason is relatively clear, especially as it
> > applies to anyone that has taken an oath swearing allegiance to the
> > United States Constitution, which clearly states that the oath taker
> > swears to uphold the Constitution against enemies foreign AND
> > domestic. One definition is vague enough to include dissidents like
> > myself IF one reads it as is, rather than considers what it really
> > states and that is that treason is "a crime that undermines the
> > offender's government." I certainly am not in favor of our present
> > government and won't support it or anything it seeks to do until it
> > [this is important] recognizes the authority of the American people,
> > the true owners of this government. Theoretically, our politicians are
> > suppose to represent us the American people, when they stop
> > representing what we the people want they need to either leave office
> > voluntarily or be thrown out.
>
> > The legal definition of treason as defined by Merriam Webster is
> > simply a "betrayal of trust." Now if the current representatives of
> > this government aren't guilty of treason as defined by Merriam Webster
> > I don't know what to say, they [Democrats and Republicans] have done
> > nothing but lie, deceive, subvert, coerce, threaten, and betray our
> > trust since 9-11. They have already engaged in treason and many of
> > them know it, that is why you see so many of them completely selling
> > out at present, selling their corrupt souls and votes to the hidden
> > elite - the true rulers of the United States of America, who by the
> > way do not represent the American people.
>
> > Am I saying that George Bush is a traitor? Damn right I am. I'm also
> > accusing the following Senators of High Treason, each one of them
> > voted to give amnesty to the 20 million illegal invaders presently
> > squatting on American soil and not one of them can or ever will
> > attempt to prove that the majority of their constituents [The people
> > that elected these people to represent THEM] approve of any form of
> > amnesty or forgiveness of the illegal aliens in their midst, not one.
> > Thus, it's really simple no? These Senators are NOT representing those
> > that voted for them - they are however, representing something or
> > someone else.
>
> > continuedhttp://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/05/at-what-point-do-we-pull-...

"Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1180018130.669131.130180@p77g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>
> What I find hilarious about WASP patriots is that they don't seem to
> realize how heavily hispanic the U.S. military is! And speaking of
> Jewish media power, I also find it funny how several media
> personalities are now hispanic, such that you have hispanic
> journalists covering the immigration debates -- LOL!!!


11.7%

White folks make up over 2/3 of the US Army.

On May 24, 7:47 pm, "RSweeney" <dockscie...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> 11.7%

Only?? I would have thought a little more than that, at like
~15%...and I'm talking about early '90s; I would think it's even more
by now (though it's the news that the number of blacks are declining).

> White folks make up over 2/3 of the US Army.

Yes, that does appear to be right. But that's still barely 70%...good
luck trying to get all the Sanchezes, Hernandezes, Velasquezes,
Torreses, et al. to shoot at illegal hispanics! It's the Decline of
Rome all over again, only in reverse (with the "latins" swamping the
"teutons")...hehe!

Not hard having them shoot at'em while at home, they'll probably shoot at'em
for pay on this side of the fence, too.

HWB

"Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1180101139.430692.138300@u30g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com...
> On May 24, 7:47 pm, "RSweeney" <dockscie...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, that does appear to be right. But that's still barely 70%...good
> luck trying to get all the Sanchezes, Hernandezes, Velasquezes,
> Torreses, et al. to shoot at illegal hispanics! It's the Decline of
> Rome all over again, only in reverse (with the "latins" swamping the
> "teutons")...hehe!
>

On May 25, 1:36 pm, "kd5sak" <kd5...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Not hard having them shoot at'em while at home, they'll probably shoot at'em
> for pay on this side of the fence, too.
>
> HWB



Intramural violence is negligible because hispanics breed so
prodigiously.

Might as well enjoy those big-butt latinas while you can. They really
like whiteboys, hoss!