Re: Woman loses 95 pounds, trains for marathons

On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, K. A. Cannon wrote:
>
>>Carrying around an large excess of weight is bad for your health.
>>It's not "fat bashing". It's a sound medically proven fact.
>
>To a point, I'll accept your comment. However, many "doctors" say that
>the "healthy" weight for women is painfully skinny. My mother is 5 foot
>4, and currently weighs 180. Her doctor has told her that she needs to
>lose 100 lbs. Yes, he said 100! Unless he doesn't know simple math, that
>would make her "ideal" weight only 80 lbs!

I'm calling bullshit! According to CDC's BMI calculator at
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/...culator/bmi_ca
lculator.htm , your mother's BMI would be under 14 if she weighed 80
pounds. Anything under 18.5 is considered underweight. Either you or your
mother is a lying sack of shit.

Let me guess. Your mother is still a fat cunt.

"Kenny" <kenny4u@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:20071005005427.BE63B4E50E@outpost.zedz.net...
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, The Master
<tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
> wrote:
> I'm calling bullshit! According to CDC's BMI calculator at
>
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/...culator/bmi_ca
> lculator.htm , your mother's BMI would be under 14 if she weighed 80
> pounds. Anything under 18.5 is considered underweight. Either you
or your
> mother is a lying sack of shit.
>
> Let me guess. Your mother is still a fat cunt.

Yeah, and we all know how reliable the CDC is in matters
concerning fat. That "300,000 deaths a year from obesity" statistic
(or was it 400,000?) was soundly smacked on its head by scientists who
actually know how to do math. In that particular instance, the CDC
would be the "lying sack of shit".

Robin

On Fri, 05 Oct 2007, "Robin King" <mapletree@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>"Kenny" <kenny4u@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:20071005005427.BE63B4E50E@outpost.zedz.net.. .
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, The Master
><tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
>> wrote:
>> I'm calling bullshit! According to CDC's BMI calculator at
>>
>http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/...culator/bmi_ca
>> lculator.htm , your mother's BMI would be under 14 if she weighed 80
>> pounds. Anything under 18.5 is considered underweight. Either you
>or your
>> mother is a lying sack of shit.
>>
>> Let me guess. Your mother is still a fat cunt.
>
> Yeah, and we all know how reliable the CDC is in matters
>concerning fat. That "300,000 deaths a year from obesity" statistic
>(or was it 400,000?) was soundly smacked on its head by scientists who
>actually know how to do math. In that particular instance, the CDC
>would be the "lying sack of shit".

Are you stating that the BMI calculator on the CDC's web site is
mathematically inaccurate?

My word, such violence...

All I said was that my mother's doctor told her that she should lose 100
lbs... Since she is 180 lbs, that would place her at 80 lbs. I cannot
say if her Doctor was rounding, or if he goofed up and meant to say she
should be 100 lbs. However, what he said was that she should lose 100.

Either way, don't b!tch to me about the doctor making an unrealistic and
unhelathy demand.



>>> I'm calling bullshit! According to CDC's BMI calculator at
>>>
>> http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/...culator/bmi_ca
>>> lculator.htm , your mother's BMI would be under 14 if she weighed 80
>>> pounds. Anything under 18.5 is considered underweight. Either you
>> or your
>>> mother is a lying sack of shit.

"The Master" <> All I said was that my mother's doctor told her that she
should lose 100 lbs... I cannot say if her Doctor was rounding, or if he
goofed up and meant to say she should be 100 lbs.>>

What he probably wanted to say was "He you fat b*tch, lose a ton, you fat
sack of sh*t." However, do to professional constraints, he just said "Listen
you fat whore, lose a hundred pounds."