 |  | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition. Discuss Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition, on Health Forums.
| | 
08-15-2007, 12:22 PM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition In article <46C245DF.81B908CC@treason.gov>,
Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>Don Stockbauer wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 3:13 pm, Henry <impe...@bush.gov> wrote:
>
>>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>>>
>>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
>>>
>>> On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
>>> had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
>>> at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
>>> demolition.
>>>
>>> http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
>>> http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
>
>> It's my understanding that jets flew into these buildings.
>
> If you "understand" that a jet hit WTC7, you're mistaken.
>But then, itr's hard to find a parrot of the Bush regime's
>lies who isn't.
>
>
> http://911research.wtc7.net
> http://stj911.org
> http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
> http://www.911truth.org
>
>
>
> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>to raging infernos for hours on end.
>
> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
The Madrid Windsor Tower fire shows that steel columns will collapse
in a fire. It is the concrete section that was more
fire-resistant. The excellent passive fire resistance of the tower's
concrete columns and core prevented total building collapse but the
steel colums did collapse.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001 | 
08-17-2007, 12:32 PM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
> Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
> thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
Most of the fuel burned off in a few seconds. That's what
produced the huge fireballs, kooker. Regardless, you're saying
that these fires: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...wtcfires2.html
Were larger and hotter than theses fires: http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
That pretty much confirms that your stupidity is so extreme
that it approaches a form of mental illness. I'm glad you're
a parrot of the Bush reigme's cartoon conspriacy theory - you
help destroy what little credibility it had. Thanks! <vbg>
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | 
08-26-2007, 07:32 PM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
> Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
> thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
Most of the fuel burned off in a few seconds. That's what
produced the huge fireballs, kooker. Regardless, you're saying
that these fires: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...wtcfires2.html
Were larger and hotter than theses fires: http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
That pretty much confirms that your stupidity is so extreme
that it approaches a form of mental illness. I'm glad you're
a parrot of the Bush reigme's cartoon conspriacy theory - you
help destroy what little credibility it had. Thanks! <vbg>
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | 
08-28-2007, 02:26 AM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
> Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
> thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
Most of the fuel burned off in a few seconds. That's what
produced the huge fireballs, kooker. Regardless, you're saying
that these fires: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...wtcfires2.html
Were larger and hotter than theses fires: http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
That pretty much confirms that your stupidity is so extreme
that it approaches a form of mental illness. I'm glad you're
a parrot of the Bush regime's cartoon conspiracy theory - you
help destroy what little credibility it had. Thanks! <vbg>
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | 
09-01-2007, 06:59 PM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
> Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
> thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
Most of the fuel burned off in a few seconds. That's what
produced the huge fireballs, kooker. Regardless, you're saying
that these fires: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...wtcfires2.html
Were larger and hotter than theses fires: http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
That pretty much confirms that your stupidity is so extreme
that it approaches a form of mental illness. I'm glad you're
a parrot of the Bush reigme's cartoon conspriacy theory - you
help destroy what little credibility it had. Thanks! <vbg>
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | 
09-09-2007, 07:52 PM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition In article <46E3303A.EBA0E09F@insidejob.gov>,
Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>Al Dykes wrote:
>> In article <46D98B48.1DDA71D5@insidejob.gov>,
>> Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>>> Henry <bushcheney@treason.gov> wrote:
>
>>>>> Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
>>>>> to raging infernos for hours on end.
>>>>> http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
>
>>>> Your are pointing to the Madrid fire. It didn't have
>>>> thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.
>
>>> Most of the fuel burned off in a few seconds. That's what
>>> produced the huge fireballs, kooker. Regardless, you're saying
>>> that these fires:
>
>> And the resulting flash fire burned to the moment of collapse.
>
> But of course, even if the fires had been hot enough to weaken
>some of the steel columns to the point where they gradually began
>to bend (they weren't), there's no way the entire massive steel
>frame would explode and disintegrate in a matter of seconds. Nothing
>below the fire and impact zone was damaged, and that's where the
>steel frames were thickest and strongest. This has been irrefutably
>proved by highly credible unbiased experts in peer reviewed papers.
>
>http://www.journalof911studies.com/l...FrankLegge.pdf
>
The frame didn't "explode and disintegrate". The beams, 250,000 tons
of them were "the pile" and they were cut up and haulded out, one by
one.
Whereever your highly credible unbiased experts are hiding, it's not
in that one page of talking points.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001 | 
09-14-2007, 04:58 AM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>> But of course, even if the fires had been hot enough to weaken
>> some of the steel columns to the point where they gradually began
>> to bend (they weren't), there's no way the entire massive steel
>> frame would explode and disintegrate in a matter of seconds. Nothing
>> below the fire and impact zone was damaged, and that's where the
>> steel frames were thickest and strongest. This has been irrefutably
>> proved by highly credible unbiased experts in peer reviewed papers.
>> http://www.journalof911studies.com/l...FrankLegge.pdf
> The frame didn't "explode and disintegrate".
You should do some basic research fires, then post your opinions.
That's exactly what took place, as proved by photo and video
evidence. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...collapses.html
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | 
09-18-2007, 03:18 AM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition In article <46EC469C.D6D12373@insidejob.gov>,
Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>Al Dykes wrote:
>> In article <46E9F759.B8611402@insidejob.gov>,
>> Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>>> Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>
>>>>> But of course, even if the fires had been hot enough to weaken
>>>>> some of the steel columns to the point where they gradually began
>>>>> to bend (they weren't), there's no way the entire massive steel
>>>>> frame would explode and disintegrate in a matter of seconds. Nothing
>>>>> below the fire and impact zone was damaged, and that's where the
>>>>> steel frames were thickest and strongest. This has been irrefutably
>>>>> proved by highly credible unbiased experts in peer reviewed papers.
>
>>>>> http://www.journalof911studies.com/l...FrankLegge.pdf
>
>>>> The frame didn't "explode and disintegrate".
>
>>> You should do some basic research fires, then post your opinions.
>>> That's exactly what took place, as proved by photo and video
>>> evidence.
>
>>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...collapses.html
>
>> The frame didn't "explode and disintegrate".
>
> Repeating a very stupid lie doesn't make it any less
>stupid. That's exactly what took place. The photos and
>videos really aren't faked, kooker.
>
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...collapses.html
Kook. The dust obscured the beams and rubble that landed in the pile.
Beams that are the size of a couple pixles in those pictures are in
reality so big that they need to be cut up int truck-length sections
for removal.
Here;s one of the beams shown with people for scale. http://army.firststrike.net/nyd/dama...damage_366.htm
Here's the World Financial Center, 100 yards to the west with one of
those beams sticking out the side like a javalin. http://army.firststrike.net/nyd/dama...damage_177.htm
Anyone that hasn't seen Ground Zero in NYC and the "Truth Movement"
kooks that hang out there should look at the first three videos. The
others should be required viewing by anyone that has an opinion about
9/11 and WTC or has never been to NYC.
Ground Zero 911 Conspiracy Wars by Ray Rivera http://rayrivera.net http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...15283354424113
The Ground Zeros by Mark Roberts http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...37229146&hl=en
WTC Ground Zero 9/11/2007 Sad. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr2LeCXXIjo
The Naudet Film about 9/11 at WTC http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...12957&q=Naudet
Marks's collapse video http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...95848233&hl=en
"The 9 - 11 Conspiracies - Fact or Fiction" http://www.torrentbox.com/torrent_details?id=125450
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001 | 
09-19-2007, 03:18 AM
| | | Re: WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition Al Dykes wrote:
> Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>> Al Dykes wrote:
>>> The frame didn't "explode and disintegrate".
>> Repeating a very stupid lie doesn't make it any less
>> stupid. That's exactly what took place. The photos and
>> videos really aren't faked, kooker.
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...collapses.html
> Kook. The dust obscured the beams and rubble that landed in the pile.
Those would be the beams that were thrown hundreds of feet when
the massive undamaged steel frames exploded and disintegrated
during the demolition.
> Beams that are the size of a couple pixles in those pictures are in
> reality so big that they need to be cut up int truck-length sections
> for removal.
> Here;s one of the beams shown with people for scale.
> http://army.firststrike.net/nyd/dama...damage_366.htm
That's not one steel beam. It's a section of the perimter frame
with the spandrel plates still attached. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/perimeter.html
> Here's the World Financial Center, 100 yards to the west with one of
> those beams sticking out the side like a javalin.
> http://army.firststrike.net/nyd/dama...damage_177.htm
Those are more beams that were thrown hundreds of feet when
the massive undamaged steel frames exploded and disintegrated
during the demolition. Thanks for proving my point again, although
it really wasn't necessary.
-- http://911research.wtc7.net http://stj911.org http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end. http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq? http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq. http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm http://www.commondreams.org/ http://www.truthout.org/ http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/ http://thirdworldtraveler.com/ http://counterpunch.org/ http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron... | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21 PM. | | | |  |