Reg Park is DEAD

In article
<263d710c-3df0-44a9-925d-9ce74bd615f4@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 4, 1:58 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Women who are going to play at being models in the first place and hang
> > out with body builders to be photographed...
> >
> > Many women of that ilk would _love_ to be fondled by someone like Arnold.
> > And any that deny it are liars.
>
> The thing is, according to the allegations, he wasn't romantic about
> it (I know it sounds funny, but we're talking about the ladies' POV
> here, after all)...he was just doing the frat-boy thing instead of
> being some Romeo...there's a difference between "fondling" and
> "grabbing"....
>
> > I know the games that women play...
> >
> > They are rather good at it. I have no pity when it comes to games like
> > that. After all, nobody was raped, nobody was hurt!
>
> Well, they claim to have been humiliated. Now, I'm not exactly the
> most sympathetic observer of the human condition when it comes to big-
> breasted princesses, but what's on trial, so to speak, is his
> character, not theirs -- and he sounds like a frat-boy who's had it
> too good for too long.
>
> > Like I said, they could have walked away if their feelings were so
> > offended.
>
> They ran away in tears.
>

Not they, She.

And why did she wait until Arnold was a politician to come forward and
start this shit?
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<7e8db3fa-1034-4ee4-a82c-04026a62eda8@l16g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 4, 1:07 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Somehow I doubt that Arnold ever "abused" any women
> > that did not welcome it.
> >
> > I mean, come on!
> >
> > From what I read, he only fondled them.
> > I'd hardly call that abuse. All they had to do was walk
> > away...
>
> -=blink!=-
>
> What?
>
> ...
>
> What?
>
> WHAT?!
>
> WHAT THE FCUK????!!!!!!
>
> I had this general opinion of you as a... politically correct person
> more or less.

You wish. ;-)
We all have our dark sides.

Trust me. I have a very good personal reason to not trust the ulterior
motives of many women. Or humans in general for that matter.

Just because I like people in general does not mean I trust them.
And people that wait until someone is not only famous, but in a position
to be hurt by scandal to suddenly crawl out of the closet...

Forgive me if that seems to be a bit suspicious.

It's like the Mike Jackson scandal. I never believed that either!
Jackson is the "Peter Pan" of the entertainment world! He's no more a
child molester than you are. He's simply a child... and wanted to try to
live something he was never given the chance to live when he was younger.

Is he a nutty phreak? Yes, but he's not a criminal.
He's also a rich nutty phreak and our current batch of humans are
basically lazy and would rather sue for money than work for it!

>
> Uh, "only fondled them," the women welcomed it, and they could have
> simply walked away? Er...
>
> No.
>
> While I'm sure there were women (maybe akin to Wilt Chamberlain's
> claimed 10,000) who enjoyed the Oak's, let's be generous and call it
> good natured boisterousness and roaming hands, however to say that
> they were asking for it and/or that it would have been a simple
> question of, oh, just walking away from Arnold is, I believe, just
> sliiiiightly out of touch with reality, Om.
>
> Yeah, "come on!"

Ok.

>
> He's ARNOLD, for God's sake. No small amount of star power. I imagine
> that if you were working in Hollywood you'd have to walk a LONG way to
> get out from under Arnold's shadow.
>
> "Eef you doahn't sock my deek den you fill nefer wohrk in da moofies
> evah again. Ant if I'm evah elected Goffornor of dis state of
> Keelifourneeyah, den you can count on your life being made a leeving
> hail, and all dat stoff."
>
> He *ONLY* fondled them.
>
> "Hey, talk to my pob-blee-cyst. Tell dem, Om, vaht's a seemple grab on
> der boob, right? It's only a teet for Christ's sake!"

I'm a big believer in personal responsibility.
Arny had a reputation. He was a young, horny guy and young horny frat
guys do things like that.

I've never been one to hold one's foolish youth against them. Hell, I
did stupid things in college too that I regret!

And I grew out of it.

I guess it's hard to explain my feelings on this.... It's complex.

>
> HANG YOUR HEAD, OM! HANG YOUR HEAD!`
>
> --
> Curt

No way dude. ;-)

I've known and seen too many women get pregnant to entrap guys, and then
pay for it for the rest of their lives. Humans make stupid decisions
sometimes, and they need to quit being such chickenshits and take
responsibility for their actions.

That goes for Arnold too actually, but I don't think he deserves to have
his political career spoiled over youthful follies and a few greedy gold
diggers.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<ff78eeed-5130-4705-8c41-d4126998a9fa@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Trust me, I am in no way a friend of the female sex. I think they are
> meat -- I think religious fundies like the Muslims and Hasids have got
> it right, basically

And that just pretty much disqualified you from a trustworthy opinion on
the subject. <g>

It's one thing to not trust them like I do. (Or rather, don't)
It's entirely a different matter that you view them as things to be used.
Objects with no minds...
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<f0cc6262-92fd-4e08-af64-c827e2832191@e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 5, 12:16 am, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hesse is the kind of writer that gets thrown at teenagers when they are
> > hitting drugs, alcohol, etc. (college) and he makes an impression. I liked
> > Siddhartha, but the second time I tried to read it I went HO-HUM and put it
> > down.
> >
> > For all of Hesse's Eastern Philosophy, he made sure to put his name on every
> > book and to milk his fame for everything it was worth. Hesse was part of the
> > Dalai Lama faction of Eastern Philosophy celebrities who preach austerity,
> > etc., but are checking the interest on their CD accounts and buying new
> > limousines every year.
>
> Me, I actually came to him by accident, only through Bantam's old
> "First Language Dual Reader: German"...OOP now, but widely available
> through exlibris.com and such sites...whatever Hesse's personal life
> and politics, this is a beautiful essay and you should definitely give
> it a try.
>
> I'm an atheist but I find the Bible very beautiful and poetic and
> wise, too.

And loaded with UFO sightings...

<eg>
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<63d00d3d-fbdc-489a-89d8-599b80aea5e2@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Now if she was coming on to him, etc., that's different. She
> apparently was just showing up with coffee!

My question is, why did she wait until he was the Guvernator before
crawling out of the depths of the past? What does she want? What is her
motive in trying to create scandal at this point in his life?

He's been rich enough for a loooooong time to have paid her off in the
distant past if all she wants is money.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article <4756cb19$0$44244$dbd45001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
"Uncle Bob" <unclebobrules@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> schreef:
>
> > I'm sooooooooooooooooooo sorry I spent ~$60 on Mentzer DVDs from
> > bodybuilding.com...what a fuckin' rip-off...bad quality, etc., etc. --
>
> I have about 50 Gigs on my drive, downloaded for free.
>
> From Dorian to Lee Priest.
>
> Coleman looks impressive, but watching him DE-motivates me. He talks like a
> loon.
>
> For motivation, nothing beats Pumping Iron. Nothing.
>
> Lee Haney is also an intelligent speaker, as is Lee Priest, who kinds sees a
> few things in perspective.
>
> --
> Uncle Bob

Priest is my favorite from the current batch. I have to respect him for
speaking his mind.

I was sad to see his column removed from MD magazine. I'm actually
fixin' to drop my subscription as they have deteriorated. They dropped
Lee and gave that freakin' weirdo Valentino a SECOND column!

I mean geeze. :-/
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article <4756cc27$0$47464$dbd45001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
"Uncle Bob" <unclebobrules@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> schreef:
>
> > And I don't remember any of the girls swooning over how "cute" (as they
> > would say) these guys looked.
>
> I once asked a woman if she was bothered by the fact that my penis is small.
>
> She told me that size didnt matter. Really, that was what she said.
>
> Women dont lie about these things... do they?
>
> --
> Uncle Bob

Did she point and laugh? ;-)
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 6, 9:56 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> And loaded with UFO sightings...

And the strongest man who ever lived, Samson!

The Bible's got it all, hasn't it...incest, rape, seven-headed
monsters, bad real estate deals, immigration politics, and plenty of
sex advice!

> <eg>
> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 5, 6:42 pm, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Some bodybuilders have to earn extra money under the covers, usually with
> wealthy homosexuals. Women pay for good looking guys, not steroid-freaks.


I would think that such women, who are of a mind to pay for sex, would
be interested in seeing what it would be like to get it on with a
freaky beefcake.

On Dec 6, 10:01 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> My question is, why did she wait until he was the Guvernator before
> crawling out of the depths of the past? What does she want? What is her
> motive in trying to create scandal at this point in his life?

Being young, she might have been intimidated. She certainly was
humiliated -- and it was probably something hard to prove (these
things usually are), so she might have figured, forget it. But being
that someone's running for public office and is supposed to represent
communal ideals of personal integrity, she might have decided to
finally spill the beans.

> He's been rich enough for a loooooong time to have paid her off in the
> distant past if all she wants is money.

Which would seem to help disprove the gold-digger theory.

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<94308f9d-e0ba-4a6c-a849-e4f1713b7bf9@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 9:56 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > And loaded with UFO sightings...
>
> And the strongest man who ever lived, Samson!
>
> The Bible's got it all, hasn't it...incest, rape, seven-headed
> monsters, bad real estate deals, immigration politics, and plenty of
> sex advice!
>

I see you read for content... ;-)

I've read the bible a couple of times. It is a very good read.

Ever read the Book of Mormon?
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<f121d598-2e3d-4c7d-ba42-2a680a9a7500@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 10:01 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > My question is, why did she wait until he was the Guvernator before
> > crawling out of the depths of the past? What does she want? What is her
> > motive in trying to create scandal at this point in his life?
>
> Being young, she might have been intimidated. She certainly was
> humiliated -- and it was probably something hard to prove (these
> things usually are), so she might have figured, forget it. But being
> that someone's running for public office and is supposed to represent
> communal ideals of personal integrity, she might have decided to
> finally spill the beans.
>
> > He's been rich enough for a loooooong time to have paid her off in the
> > distant past if all she wants is money.
>
> Which would seem to help disprove the gold-digger theory.
>

Not really.

In Hollywood, actors are known to have "alternative morals".
Politicians are supposed to represent the morals of the US populace.

Ironic isn't it?
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 6, 9:55 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
>
>
> And that just pretty much disqualified you from a trustworthy opinion on
> the subject. <g>

Actually, it just goes to show that I am probably predisposed to be
skeptical of the women claiming such things.

Funny you didn't pick that up.

> It's one thing to not trust them like I do. (Or rather, don't)

You don't trust them because they're too smart for you...I trust them
because, outside of sex, they're not even cunning, much less
intelligent.

Of course, there are lots of intelligent women around -- I speak of
the class, not particular individuals (probability, not possibility).

> It's entirely a different matter that you view them as things to be used.
> Objects with no minds...

Technically speaking, of course they have minds. But it's like saying
97-lb. weaklings have got biceps. Sure, I mean, it's
there...somewhere.

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 6, 10:47 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I see you read for content... ;-)
>
> I've read the bible a couple of times. It is a very good read.
>
> Ever read the Book of Mormon?

No, only second-hand accounts -- but that Christ in America preaching
to the Natives, who are the Lost Tribes of Israel, for three days and
then schlepping back to Judea for Easter: that's a real hoot!

I totally agree with their take on a woman's sacred duty to polygamy,
though. You gotta hand it to these folks, Muslims, Hasids, and real
Mormons...they know what it's all really about!

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 6, 10:48 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Not really.

In any case, these women seem silent now. Either they have been paid
off, or the media simply lost interest and stopped giving them
coverage.

> In Hollywood, actors are known to have "alternative morals".

I think many people do, not just Hollywood.

> Politicians are supposed to represent the morals of the US populace.

I think they do, actually. The US populace is like a bitch who
complains about her abusive boyfriend...year after year.

> Ironic isn't it?

Only if you take the bitch seriously!

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 6, 2:15 am, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Indeed, my ex had the same reaction. Personally I'm not so much
> disgusted as amazed/amused that somebody would do that to themselves.
>
> Disclosure: I'm a triathlete....
>
> dman, of The Auckland Lair.
>
> www.AucklandLair.com
>
> www.NewZealandLair.com


I value performance much more than looks -- but it's best to look the
part! 'Cause for "amateurs" like me, looks are what we aspire to most.

On Dec 6, 9:32 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Not they, She.

I seem to recall talk about others breaking down in tears. In any
case, I don't put it past him.

> And why did she wait until Arnold was a politician to come forward and
> start this shit?

Obviously, she thought that voters should know what kind of a person
they're considering for public office. I know the point of your
question, but the flip-side of that would be, hey, maybe she's not
vindictive and only waited until things got too big to make her
private matter a public concern.

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 4, 8:30 pm, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Prisoner at War" < he sounds like a frat-boy who's had it too good for too
> long.
>
>
>
> At least he's not a homo. He has four kids. Look at Mike Mentzer, Chris
> Dickerson and many others who have zero kids and no families and nothing
> much to show for their lives.

testosterone will pretty much make you sterile with long-term usage.
'roids in general will slowly break you down in mind and body.

fo

On Dec 7, 9:03 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2:15 am, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Indeed, my ex had the same reaction. Personally I'm not so much
> > disgusted as amazed/amused that somebody would do that to themselves.
>
> > Disclosure: I'm a triathlete....
>
> > dman, of The Auckland Lair.
>
> >www.AucklandLair.com
>
> >www.NewZealandLair.com
>
> I value performance much more than looks -- but it's best to look the
> part! 'Cause for "amateurs" like me, looks are what we aspire to most.

An amateur what?

On Dec 6, 4:32 pm, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> An amateur what?


Amateur strong man. I meant "amateur" in a self-deprecating way...I
am into physical fitness, running and weight-lifting, but not as a
competitor (except with myself, really).

I was just saying there that for "casual" folk like me, sure we'd like
to be strong and/or fast, but most of all we want to look it. =)

On Dec 7, 10:46 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 4:32 pm, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > An amateur what?
>
> Amateur strong man. I meant "amateur" in a self-deprecating way...I
> am into physical fitness, running and weight-lifting, but not as a
> competitor (except with myself, really).
>
> I was just saying there that for "casual" folk like me, sure we'd like
> to be strong and/or fast, but most of all we want to look it. =)

Ahhh.... I see now. Personally I would rather BE fast (well, fast
relatively speaking... fast for an Ironman athlete!).

So far as looks go, I'm not too bothered by that. I know I'll look ok
(i.e. not overweight) if my primary goal of actually BEING fast is
achieved.



dman, of The Auckland Lair.

www.AucklandLair.com

www.NewZealandLair.com

Omelet:
> > And why did she wait until Arnold was
> > a politician to come forward
> > and start this shit?

Prisoner:
> Obviously, she thought that voters
> should know what kind of a person
> they're considering for public office...

Obviously? I say nonsense. The more obvious is that now
that he's worth a bazillion bucks he'll give some of
it to her to shut her up.

If some guy is a molestor, does it matter if he's an
up and coming movie star, a mr Oly, Gov of CA or a
floor sweeper? If what he did was so horrible that
she needs to turn him in to someone, then she should
have done so then.


Lumpy

You were on CHiPs? Did you wear those sexy
tight pants and high boots like Erik Estrada?
No. Swimtrunks.
www.LumpyMusic.net

"Prisoner at War" <> I would think that such women, who are of a mind to pay
for sex, would be interested in seeing what it would be like to get it on
with a
> freaky beefcake.>>

Steroids have a reputation for shrinking the nads and causing impotence.
Women wants studs not duds.

"dman" <I know I'll look ok (i.e. not overweight) if my primary goal of
actually BEING fast is achieved.
>

POst your real name! Post your photo! Who are you?

On Dec 6, 9:40 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]

> We all have our dark sides.

NOT ME! I AM A BEING OF PURE LIGHT!

)

What?

Hey, be suspicious. Go ahead. Ask JWM for verification!

--
Curt

On Dec 6, 10:04 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]

> Priest is my favorite from the current batch. I have to respect him for
> speaking his mind.
>
> I was sad to see his column removed from MD magazine. I'm actually
> fixin' to drop my subscription as they have deteriorated. They dropped
> Lee <snip>

Priest has a column in my favorite magazine: Robert Kennedy's
MuscleMag International!

Did you know that, Om?

--

On Dec 7, 4:13 pm, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "dman" <I know I'll look ok (i.e. not overweight) if my primary goal of
> actually BEING fast is achieved.
>
>
>
> POst your real name! Post your photo! Who are you?

lol, nah... no need to hand stuff to the stalkers on a silver
platter! ;-)

I'm nobody famous, am not a professional athlete. Never done any
better than win a few regional titles in athletics.

On Dec 6, 9:40 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You wish. ;-)
> We all have our dark sides.

Careful, or you'll burst his bubble and he'll shit all over himself!

> Trust me. I have a very good personal reason to not trust the ulterior
> motives of many women. Or humans in general for that matter.

Amazing...whereas I trust human beings -- because they are more
predictable than not.

> Just because I like people in general does not mean I trust them.
> And people that wait until someone is not only famous, but in a position
> to be hurt by scandal to suddenly crawl out of the closet...
>
> Forgive me if that seems to be a bit suspicious.

S'okay to be suspicious. Makes for long usenet threads.

> It's like the Mike Jackson scandal. I never believed that either!
> Jackson is the "Peter Pan" of the entertainment world! He's no more a
> child molester than you are. He's simply a child... and wanted to try to
> live something he was never given the chance to live when he was younger.

OMG, Om, but you are a sentimentalist after all! Basically, a
different shade of Curt, LOL....

> Is he a nutty phreak? Yes, but he's not a criminal.

He touched those kids. No way someone loves something and doesn't
touch what s/he loves when it's in such close proximity, under such
private circumstances....

> He's also a rich nutty phreak and our current batch of humans are
> basically lazy and would rather sue for money than work for it!

There's no such thing as "laziness." There is only interest, or lack
of interest. Shysters, lawyers, and con artists merely have different
interests where their skills and temperaments are concerned.

> Ok.

In other news: hot blonde teacher LeFavre got busted again for being
too friendly with an under-age male.

This is the ridiculous p.c. shit that Curt and his crowd of pitchfork
and torch enthusiasts cause every news cycle.

> I'm a big believer in personal responsibility.
> Arny had a reputation. He was a young, horny guy and young horny frat
> guys do things like that.

I wonder what Curt did as a young horny frat reject. I mean, he can't
even do a Teutonic accent right, so there's no chance of pretending to
be some exotic foreign exchange student. Was he bothering weight-
lifters in the college gym?

> I've never been one to hold one's foolish youth against them. Hell, I
> did stupid things in college too that I regret!

College kids are just kids. They should be denied everything from the
vote to alcohol to cars to pussy until they can learn to use spell-
checkers on e-mail.

> And I grew out of it.

Perhaps you simply lost interest.

I'm particularly troubled by this hey-I-was-young excuse that's ALWAYS
proffered when all else fails. It really speaks volumes about
American society that so-called "youthful indiscretion" is a valid get-
out-of-jail pass where public opinion is concerned.

> I guess it's hard to explain my feelings on this.... It's complex.

Don't worry about Curt and his gang of hallway monitors; just tell it
like it is. The real men understand you.

> No way dude. ;-)
>
> I've known and seen too many women get pregnant to entrap guys, and then
> pay for it for the rest of their lives. Humans make stupid decisions
> sometimes, and they need to quit being such chickenshits and take
> responsibility for their actions.
>
> That goes for Arnold too actually, but I don't think he deserves to have
> his political career spoiled over youthful follies and a few greedy gold
> diggers.

Sure some of his accusers may be gold-diggers, but some of them may be
for real.

As it is, the whole thing's blown over probably because, in the end,
it's all about a lack of evidence.

Heck, just look at MFW: despite everything being written in black and
white, for all perpetuity, people still have reading comprehension
problems and a lack of critical thinking skills and choose to see what
they want to see.

In situations where you have Arnold, some perky young office
assistant, and a Hollywood producer or two, I'm sure there's no way to
prove anything against him.

But Arnold's guilty all right. Maybe not of all counts, in all
instances, but he's guilty. We know what the guy is like, we know
what guys are like, and though we also know how girls can get, we
know, most of all, that he hasn't outright denied anything, insofar as
he conceded that he hasn't always behaved in the best way -- the hey-I-
was-young excuse.

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

You're right, which is partly why I still value performance over
appearance, even though I've conceded that the best I'll likely
achieve is appearance, mainly.

It's an artificial distinction in some ways, since usually one looks
as well as one can perform...but maybe I'm just lazy, then (not as
interested in investing the amount of dedication required)....

Ironmen triathletes are are cool...they should have powerlifting/
weightlifting events, though, to round things out...aerobic capacity
and muscular endurance are key, but all-out strength and speed is also
important...I wonder if it is actually possible to have a meaningful
contest which included all such events, since athleticism is
bifurcated into "strength" and "endurance"....


On Dec 6, 4:58 pm, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ahhh.... I see now. Personally I would rather BE fast (well, fast
> relatively speaking... fast for an Ironman athlete!).
>
> So far as looks go, I'm not too bothered by that. I know I'll look ok
> (i.e. not overweight) if my primary goal of actually BEING fast is
> achieved.
>
> dman, of The Auckland Lair.
>
> www.AucklandLair.com
>
> www.NewZealandLair.com

On Dec 7, 12:54 am, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> lol, nah... no need to hand stuff to the stalkers on a silver
> platter! ;-)
>
> I'm nobody famous, am not a professional athlete. Never done any
> better than win a few regional titles in athletics.


Post your real name! Post your pics! Otherwise you're just making it
up!! How do we know you're not just some super-intelligent dolphin
with a radio collar!!!

On Dec 6, 6:55 pm, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
>
>
> Obviously? I say nonsense. The more obvious is that now
> that he's worth a bazillion bucks he'll give some of
> it to her to shut her up.

It's possible -- and I'm just saying that it's also possible that at
least one of his accusers is totally honest. I mean, we know what
Arnold was like, we know what Hollywood big shots are like -- heck, we
know what guys are like -- and if it were simply about money, Arnold
would have released some letter from the ladies or their lawyers to
that effect. If anything, he actually conceded (his wife probably
made him, I suspect) that he was occasionally not on his best behavior
during those days (the ol' youthful indiscretion excuse), while still
denying these specific allegations (*you* read between the lines!).

> If some guy is a molestor, does it matter if he's an
> up and coming movie star, a mr Oly, Gov of CA or a
> floor sweeper? If what he did was so horrible that
> she needs to turn him in to someone, then she should
> have done so then.

Actually, no. I am, by definition, a rapist, since I've had girls say
"no" naked in my bed but I still fucked them, even made two cry in the
process. Now none of them ever hated me for it afterwards (or at
least they didn't break up with me and call the cops), but legally
speaking, I raped them, and if I were to run for World Dictator one
day, they might decide that, hey, people should know what kind of a
dictator I'd make! =)

> Lumpy
>
> You were on CHiPs? Did you wear those sexy
> tight pants and high boots like Erik Estrada?
> No. Swimtrunks.www.LumpyMusic.net

On Dec 6, 9:40 pm, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Steroids have a reputation for shrinking the nads and causing impotence.
> Women wants studs not duds.


No, I'm simply saying, out of curiosity...such women probably already
know about steroids and gonads...they're just curious, that's
all...certainly I prefer big tits and ass to small ones, but I'm also
curious as to what small ones could be like, and wouldn't mind doing
petite girls (I mean, aside from being a typical guy and doing almost
any female around anyway)....

In article
<2ca1ccaf-c39c-4f13-bf86-88a1bf315a69@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 9:40 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > We all have our dark sides.
>
> NOT ME! I AM A BEING OF PURE LIGHT!
>
> )
>
> What?
>
> Hey, be suspicious. Go ahead. Ask JWM for verification!
>
> --
> Curt

Except he has vanished into the Netherworld it seems.
I've not seen him post for weeks.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<51901fcd-09ae-45e1-bc88-5d21f512f24a@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 10:04 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Priest is my favorite from the current batch. I have to respect him for
> > speaking his mind.
> >
> > I was sad to see his column removed from MD magazine. I'm actually
> > fixin' to drop my subscription as they have deteriorated. They dropped
> > Lee <snip>
>
> Priest has a column in my favorite magazine: Robert Kennedy's
> MuscleMag International!
>
> Did you know that, Om?
>
> --

I never cared much for MMI...
but thanks.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<b3e27ea6-0041-417b-b94f-eecd0e7cd35e@a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 9:55 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> >
> >
> > And that just pretty much disqualified you from a trustworthy opinion on
> > the subject. <g>
>
> Actually, it just goes to show that I am probably predisposed to be
> skeptical of the women claiming such things.
>
> Funny you didn't pick that up.

Ok.

>
> > It's one thing to not trust them like I do. (Or rather, don't)
>
> You don't trust them because they're too smart for you...I trust them
> because, outside of sex, they're not even cunning, much less
> intelligent.

Ok.

>
> Of course, there are lots of intelligent women around -- I speak of
> the class, not particular individuals (probability, not possibility).
>
> > It's entirely a different matter that you view them as things to be used.
> > Objects with no minds...
>
> Technically speaking, of course they have minds. But it's like saying
> 97-lb. weaklings have got biceps. Sure, I mean, it's
> there...somewhere.

Ok.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

In article
<d8613a04-4f9e-459a-a9d0-432b09f50faa@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 10:48 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Not really.
>
> In any case, these women seem silent now. Either they have been paid
> off, or the media simply lost interest and stopped giving them
> coverage.
>
> > In Hollywood, actors are known to have "alternative morals".
>
> I think many people do, not just Hollywood.
>
> > Politicians are supposed to represent the morals of the US populace.
>
> I think they do, actually. The US populace is like a bitch who
> complains about her abusive boyfriend...year after year.
>
> > Ironic isn't it?
>
> Only if you take the bitch seriously!

<lol> Good insight!
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein