Reg Park is DEAD

On Dec 7, 10:04 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]

> <snip> but legally speaking, I raped them, and <snip>

And did you say you're *not* an idiot? Time to reassess.

--

In article
<6d121dc3-6824-425f-9f3c-598938459815@t47g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 9:40 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > You wish. ;-)
> > We all have our dark sides.
>
> Careful, or you'll burst his bubble and he'll shit all over himself!
>
> > Trust me. I have a very good personal reason to not trust the ulterior
> > motives of many women. Or humans in general for that matter.
>
> Amazing...whereas I trust human beings -- because they are more
> predictable than not.

That's just it tho'. You never know.

>
> > Just because I like people in general does not mean I trust them.
> > And people that wait until someone is not only famous, but in a position
> > to be hurt by scandal to suddenly crawl out of the closet...
> >
> > Forgive me if that seems to be a bit suspicious.
>
> S'okay to be suspicious. Makes for long usenet threads.

<lol>!

>
> > It's like the Mike Jackson scandal. I never believed that either!
> > Jackson is the "Peter Pan" of the entertainment world! He's no more a
> > child molester than you are. He's simply a child... and wanted to try to
> > live something he was never given the chance to live when he was younger.
>
> OMG, Om, but you are a sentimentalist after all! Basically, a
> different shade of Curt, LOL....

My dark side does not rule me all the time. ;-)
I like Michael Jackson.

>
> > Is he a nutty phreak? Yes, but he's not a criminal.
>
> He touched those kids. No way someone loves something and doesn't
> touch what s/he loves when it's in such close proximity, under such
> private circumstances....

Yeah, but geez! When you pick up and hug a small child, (say, your 3 or
4 year old toddler), how do you support them? You have to wrap your arm
around them and support them under their rump.

That's not molestation!

Neither is just hugging.

>
> > He's also a rich nutty phreak and our current batch of humans are
> > basically lazy and would rather sue for money than work for it!
>
> There's no such thing as "laziness." There is only interest, or lack
> of interest. Shysters, lawyers, and con artists merely have different
> interests where their skills and temperaments are concerned.

Greed.
Without concern for the consequences to others.
Selfishness.

>
> > Ok.
>
> In other news: hot blonde teacher LeFavre got busted again for being
> too friendly with an under-age male.

Teenage female.
I heard it on the radio.

>
> This is the ridiculous p.c. shit that Curt and his crowd of pitchfork
> and torch enthusiasts cause every news cycle.
>
> > I'm a big believer in personal responsibility.
> > Arny had a reputation. He was a young, horny guy and young horny frat
> > guys do things like that.
>
> I wonder what Curt did as a young horny frat reject. I mean, he can't
> even do a Teutonic accent right, so there's no chance of pretending to
> be some exotic foreign exchange student. Was he bothering weight-
> lifters in the college gym?
>
> > I've never been one to hold one's foolish youth against them. Hell, I
> > did stupid things in college too that I regret!
>
> College kids are just kids. They should be denied everything from the
> vote to alcohol to cars to pussy until they can learn to use spell-
> checkers on e-mail.

<lol>!

>
> > And I grew out of it.
>
> Perhaps you simply lost interest.
>
> I'm particularly troubled by this hey-I-was-young excuse that's ALWAYS
> proffered when all else fails. It really speaks volumes about
> American society that so-called "youthful indiscretion" is a valid get-
> out-of-jail pass where public opinion is concerned.

Hey, we all grow up eventually.
I know for a fact that, at 45, I am NOT the same person with the same
values that I was when I was in my 20's!

Youth is wasted on the young.

>
> > I guess it's hard to explain my feelings on this.... It's complex.
>
> Don't worry about Curt and his gang of hallway monitors; just tell it
> like it is. The real men understand you.

;-)

>
> > No way dude. ;-)
> >
> > I've known and seen too many women get pregnant to entrap guys, and then
> > pay for it for the rest of their lives. Humans make stupid decisions
> > sometimes, and they need to quit being such chickenshits and take
> > responsibility for their actions.
> >
> > That goes for Arnold too actually, but I don't think he deserves to have
> > his political career spoiled over youthful follies and a few greedy gold
> > diggers.
>
> Sure some of his accusers may be gold-diggers, but some of them may be
> for real.
>
> As it is, the whole thing's blown over probably because, in the end,
> it's all about a lack of evidence.

Just like the Catholic Priest scandal?
There was no evidence there either as most of the paid out suits had
happened so many years ago...

but they paid it out anyway.

I think the media just had more fun things to occupy themselves perhaps.

>
> Heck, just look at MFW: despite everything being written in black and
> white, for all perpetuity, people still have reading comprehension
> problems and a lack of critical thinking skills and choose to see what
> they want to see.

Sounds normal to me. :-P
People hear and believe what they want most of the time.

>
> In situations where you have Arnold, some perky young office
> assistant, and a Hollywood producer or two, I'm sure there's no way to
> prove anything against him.
>
> But Arnold's guilty all right. Maybe not of all counts, in all
> instances, but he's guilty. We know what the guy is like, we know
> what guys are like, and though we also know how girls can get, we
> know, most of all, that he hasn't outright denied anything, insofar as
> he conceded that he hasn't always behaved in the best way -- the hey-I-
> was-young excuse.

I think most people understand... ;-)
The hypocrisy in the Whitehouse was even more fun.
You think at least 1/2 of the Senators are not boinking their
secretaries?
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 8, 3:45 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <10ee5f59-e6e1-47a8-9639-f46d2d7d5...@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
> Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 10:47 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I see you read for content... ;-)
>
> > > I've read the bible a couple of times. It is a very good read.
>
> > > Ever read the Book of Mormon?
>
> > No, only second-hand accounts -- but that Christ in America preaching
> > to the Natives, who are the Lost Tribes of Israel, for three days and
> > then schlepping back to Judea for Easter: that's a real hoot!
>
> > I totally agree with their take on a woman's sacred duty to polygamy,
> > though. You gotta hand it to these folks, Muslims, Hasids, and real
> > Mormons...they know what it's all really about!
>
> You can't compare muslims to mormons.
> Mormons don't treat their women like chattel...
>
> But, I can see an up-side to polygamy, even from the woman's POV.
> Most women don't like to have sex every night (there are, of course,
> exceptions). So with 7 wives, the "duty" gets spread out to once per
> week. ;-)

If she is with the right guy who she is really into and is attracted
to then she will want sex just as much as him if he is treating her
right

>
> Plus lots of help with the kids and housework...
>
> Interesting lifestyle concept.
> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 7, 9:45 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You can't compare muslims to mormons.
> Mormons don't treat their women like chattel...

Oh come off it! Anti-polygamists think polygamy by definition is
treating women like chattel.

Heck, if anyone takes their Bible seriously, they should treat their
women like chattel. But of course, Christians are age-old hypocrites,
which is why they get to pick and choose.

> But, I can see an up-side to polygamy, even from the woman's POV.
> Most women don't like to have sex every night (there are, of course,
> exceptions). So with 7 wives, the "duty" gets spread out to once per
> week. ;-)

I think a woman's nature is to be one wife among many. You know how
all women want a guy who's married....

> Plus lots of help with the kids and housework...

But would Curt approve? This is MFW -- we've also got to clear it
with Brinks, and Williams, and Hobbes, and Weirdo Smurf....

> Interesting lifestyle concept.

There was a documentary on just such a Mormon household. Sure wish I
could remember the name.

Marriage is an institution that's beginning to outlive its utility.
Hence all this stuff coming out of the woodworks now.

I can't wait for the return of the matriarchy, when people just have
sex if they want to and that's that. Any kids are the near-exclusive
responsibility of the females!

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 7, 10:14 pm, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If she is with the right guy who she is really into and is attracted
> to then she will want sex just as much as him if he is treating her
> right


Not necessarily. You forget that it's mostly about the hormones, and
people can be really mismatched in that regard.

Hence the old joke that the best pairings are young girl with old man
and young guy with old woman!

(LOL! I'm the idiot, while this squeaky wheel follows me
around...dear God, if only he would grow a pair of tits, at least!
ROTFLMAO!!)


On Dec 7, 9:56 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> And did you say you're *not* an idiot? Time to reassess.
>
> --

On Dec 7, 9:48 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think there are all kinds of ways to view this...

So keep an open mind, then.

> The thing is, people change. Some of us actually grow up.
> I just hate to see someone trying to ruin Arnold's career, probably for
> their own gain.

Ruin his career??

That really shouldn't even be a concern in the matter!

> Their 15 minutes of fame.

Funny how selective you are in your self-described mistrust of people.

> Then, of course, there is always Monica, who shall never be forgotten.
> ;-)

Nothing like a Jewish girl when it comes to fellatio!

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Dec 8, 7:53 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 10:14 pm, dman <d...@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > If she is with the right guy who she is really into and is attracted
> > to then she will want sex just as much as him if he is treating her
> > right
>
> Not necessarily. You forget that it's mostly about the hormones, and
> people can be really mismatched in that regard.
>

Yeah, I'm talking here about averages. But ignoring that, I believe
averages are similar. If not instead females have a greater drive...


> Hence the old joke that the best pairings are young girl with old man
> and young guy with old woman!

On Dec 7, 9:57 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> That's just it tho'. You never know.

But you can be pretty sure. Probability, not simply possibility.

Like spics and niggers, for instance (the dark side of darkies and
mulattoes):

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_c...html#community

This is the kind of stuff some of us "racists" deal with EVERY DAY.
It's only news this time because the spiggeria was clueless enough to
post it on youtube.

Something similar, BTW, happened yesterday in SF; check out the SF
Examiner website for the gory details.

It seems that despite continuing evidence to the contrary, we have a
lot of Jews and white liberals who are in denial or are just totally
clueless.

That's how ridiculous these poor oppressed darkies have become under
liberals, Jews, and Al Sharpton. The spigglets actually don't even
realize they could get busted for this crap!

What's really sad about "racism" is that it's at least 75% true about
85% of the time!!

Probabilities, not possibilities.

> My dark side does not rule me all the time. ;-)
> I like Michael Jackson.

Hey, I still like his songs, too. Heck, I even like stuff by gay boys
Erasure. Doesn't mean I don't know what I'm dealing with!

> Yeah, but geez! When you pick up and hug a small child, (say, your 3 or
> 4 year old toddler), how do you support them? You have to wrap your arm
> around them and support them under their rump.
>
> That's not molestation!

He molested them all right. He did more than just support them by the
rump.

Probability, not possibility, Watson.

> Neither is just hugging.

There's no such thing as "just hugging," except between two Frenchmen,
Italians, or Russians (I hope, anyway).

Look, I have a rather wide experience with females...women and
girls...it takes one to know one...no, I'm not projecting -- it simply
takes one to know one....

> Greed.
> Without concern for the consequences to others.
> Selfishness.

Funny, that's basically what the charges are against him!

> Teenage female.
> I heard it on the radio.

No, the teenage female is who got the lady busted by spilling the
beans to cops. But it was an under-age male with whom the lady was
talking, about sex and stuff.

> Hey, we all grow up eventually.

And people would grow up faster if there were real consequences....

> I know for a fact that, at 45, I am NOT the same person with the same
> values that I was when I was in my 20's!

And I'm sure any of a half-dozen axe murderers mature in a decade or
two, too...they still need to be in prison.

> Youth is wasted on the young.

Life is wasted on the living.

> ;-)
>
> Just like the Catholic Priest scandal?
> There was no evidence there either as most of the paid out suits had
> happened so many years ago...
>
> but they paid it out anyway.

Oh come on!!

The Catholic Church is full of faggots, that's why they're so
creepy...too bad Al Queda doesn't go blow up the Vatican....

> I think the media just had more fun things to occupy themselves perhaps.

No, shit was proven, all right -- the Church settled because they knew
they would have lost eventually, and the plaintiffs settled because
they were running out of money.

> Sounds normal to me. :-P
> People hear and believe what they want most of the time.

Yes, sure, but presumably usenet is a place where, by virtue of near-
complete anonymity, affords honest dialogue. Why log on just to hear
what you want to hear? You can listen to the TV or the radio for
propaganda.

> I think most people understand... ;-)

That's the problem. I wonder if people who "understand" aren't
actually just feeling guilty about their own skeletons in the
closet....

> The hypocrisy in the Whitehouse was even more fun.
> You think at least 1/2 of the Senators are not boinking their
> secretaries?

Good God, man, you really do see what you want to see!

The question isn't whether sex is going on; it's whether any of it is
consensual.

Arnold did it. Sure, it was a mistake -- and he almost admitted as
much, if you read between the lines of his reluctant but curiously
heart-felt declaration that he may have behaved inappropriately at
time during those years -- but he did it.

But, like I said (elaborating on Herr Hitler's original though less-
colorful observation), the voting public is like a whiny bitch who
complains about her abusive boyfriend -- year after year.

> --
> Peace, Om
>
> Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

BTW, just so that you know -- since you don't seem to:

The Catholic Church has had charges made against its priests for
DECADES. They were all simply hushed up, denied, etc.

They're only getting sued just recently because people are starting to
see that the Church is just a bunch of bullshit anyway and that
there's really no God so it's not like you're suing God somehow by
suing the Catholic Church, one of the largest real estate holders
anywhere. You know how sheeple are -- even though they're getting
fucked up the ass no one wants to be the first to ask for vaseline!

Just goes to show how stupid people can be -- just goes to explain a
thing like Curt, for example -- that a Church all decked out in gold
can preach about the humble life to poor people.

Ever see the movie "The Bicycle Thief"?? Fucking hilarious, the
Church.

Sure Hitler was crazy to kill all those Jews, but look on the bright
side: he would probably have gassed the Catholics next!

On Dec 6, 8:38 am, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Not sure about Dickerson's status but neither of the Mentzer brothers
> > have a life, period. Literally. They both died several years ago under
> > unusual circumstances
>
> Hearts stopping in America is suddenly unusual?


Their both dying within 48 hours of each other seems unusual. You can
posit various explantions, it's still unusual.



> > Apparently all the 'roiding caught up with them.
>
> Dickerson's alive and healthy


Not everyone is effected identically by exposure to agents known to
cause health problems.


> while the Mentzer brothers were more
> likely cut down by their own family history so far as health goes
> rather than steroid use.


And certainly it's implausible that years of juicing played any
contributing factor in two guys dying in their 40's. Not even worth
considering that on the list of long-term effects can be
cardiovascular problems and organ damage.

Taking 'roids other than to treat a medical condition is stupid.
Well, unless one firmly believes that being a bit bigger and stronger/
faster for a while is fully worth risking compromising one's long-term
health.

<fakeobama@gmail.com> schreefL

>> At least he's not a homo. He has four kids. Look at Mike Mentzer, Chris
>> Dickerson and many others who have zero kids and no families and nothing
>> much to show for their lives.

> testosterone will pretty much make you sterile with long-term usage.

4 weeks. You can have testiculer shutdown after 4 weeks.

--
Pete

On Dec 8, 1:54 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> (LOL! I'm the idiot, <snip>

Acceptance is the first step toward healing.

--

On Dec 4, 12:55 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 1:58 pm, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Women who are going to play at being models in the first place and hang
> > out with body builders to be photographed...
>
> > Many women of that ilk would _love_ to be fondled by someone like Arnold.
> > And any that deny it are liars.
>
> The thing is, according to the allegations, he wasn't romantic about
> it (I know it sounds funny, but we're talking about the ladies' POV
> here, after all)...he was just doing the frat-boy thing instead of
> being some Romeo...there's a difference between "fondling" and
> "grabbing"....
>
> > I know the games that women play...
>
> > They are rather good at it. I have no pity when it comes to games like
> > that. After all, nobody was raped, nobody was hurt!
>
> Well, they claim to have been humiliated. Now, I'm not exactly the
> most sympathetic observer of the human condition when it comes to big-
> breasted princesses, but what's on trial, so to speak, is his
> character, not theirs -- and he sounds like a frat-boy who's had it
> too good for too long.
>
> > Like I said, they could have walked away if their feelings were so
> > offended.
>
> They ran away in tears.
>
> > --
> > Peace, Om
>
> > Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.
>
> > "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???

On Dec 8, 12:41 pm, TranslucentAmoebae <transamoe...@seanet.com>
wrote:
>
>
> So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???


Well, it's arguable that early strongmen and fitness lifestyle
pioneers like Sandow are....

On Dec 8, 12:41 pm, TranslucentAmoebae <transamoe...@seanet.com>
wrote:
[...]

> So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???

I'm not sure what you mean, but from my perspective I'd say that Eugen
Sandow was the first man to treat or market his physique as 'Body as
Art'. On the other hand Michelangelo, Da Vinci, et al. certainly
treated the human body as art.

Here's a link to a radio show that offers a retrospective on Reg Park,
actor and physique competitor:

http://a1703.g.akamai.net/7/1703/218...omon112607.wma
aka http://tinyurl.com/2tk8bf

Interesting trivia that one of the radio personalities offered was
that Park won the Mr. Universe competition and then returned to win it
again... fourteen years later. How many athletes are considered the
best and then 14 years later are still considered the best? So, was
Reg the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder? Perhaps not, but there's no
question that he is a true legend of the sport and art of
bodybuilding.

Note to MFW readers, David Cohen specifically:

Hey, did someone from MFW edit the Reg Park Wiki entry? Check this:

"Reg Park was born in Yorkshire, England on 7 June 1928. An athlete
from the start, he dedicated his teenage years excelling in football
(a.k.a. American soccer). He had no interest in bodybuilding until, at
age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen. Upon learning that
Cohen lifted weights at his friend's house, Reg Park joined in with
curiosity. Unlike today's proliferation of modern gym equipment,
Park's legendary physique would grow from barbells, dumbbells and a
simple chinning bar."

At age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen? Awesome. )

--
Curt

In article
<eea5eaff-b108-416b-a61c-4e165b79468c@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 8, 12:41 pm, TranslucentAmoebae <transamoe...@seanet.com>
> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???
>
> I'm not sure what you mean, but from my perspective I'd say that Eugen
> Sandow was the first man to treat or market his physique as 'Body as
> Art'. On the other hand Michelangelo, Da Vinci, et al. certainly
> treated the human body as art.
>
> Here's a link to a radio show that offers a retrospective on Reg Park,
> actor and physique competitor:
>
> http://a1703.g.akamai.net/7/1703/218...ad.akamai.com/
> 27302/wm.na-central/Solomon/Solomon112607.wma
> aka http://tinyurl.com/2tk8bf
>
> Interesting trivia that one of the radio personalities offered was
> that Park won the Mr. Universe competition and then returned to win it
> again... fourteen years later. How many athletes are considered the
> best and then 14 years later are still considered the best? So, was
> Reg the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder? Perhaps not, but there's no
> question that he is a true legend of the sport and art of
> bodybuilding.
>
> Note to MFW readers, David Cohen specifically:
>
> Hey, did someone from MFW edit the Reg Park Wiki entry? Check this:
>
> "Reg Park was born in Yorkshire, England on 7 June 1928. An athlete
> from the start, he dedicated his teenage years excelling in football
> (a.k.a. American soccer). He had no interest in bodybuilding until, at
> age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen. Upon learning that
> Cohen lifted weights at his friend's house, Reg Park joined in with
> curiosity. Unlike today's proliferation of modern gym equipment,
> Park's legendary physique would grow from barbells, dumbbells and a
> simple chinning bar."
>
> At age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen? Awesome. )
>
> --
> Curt

"David" is a very common name for the Jewish community.

I know a very good Emergency Room physician that specializes in
nutrition on the side in his private practice.

His name is Dr. David Cohen.
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:07 -0600, Omelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article
><eea5eaff-b108-416b-a61c-4e165b79468c@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 8, 12:41 pm, TranslucentAmoebae <transamoe...@seanet.com>
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean, but from my perspective I'd say that Eugen
>> Sandow was the first man to treat or market his physique as 'Body as
>> Art'. On the other hand Michelangelo, Da Vinci, et al. certainly
>> treated the human body as art.
>>
>> Here's a link to a radio show that offers a retrospective on Reg Park,
>> actor and physique competitor:
>>
>> http://a1703.g.akamai.net/7/1703/218...ad.akamai.com/
>> 27302/wm.na-central/Solomon/Solomon112607.wma
>> aka http://tinyurl.com/2tk8bf
>>
>> Interesting trivia that one of the radio personalities offered was
>> that Park won the Mr. Universe competition and then returned to win it
>> again... fourteen years later. How many athletes are considered the
>> best and then 14 years later are still considered the best? So, was
>> Reg the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder? Perhaps not, but there's no
>> question that he is a true legend of the sport and art of
>> bodybuilding.
>>
>> Note to MFW readers, David Cohen specifically:
>>
>> Hey, did someone from MFW edit the Reg Park Wiki entry? Check this:
>>
>> "Reg Park was born in Yorkshire, England on 7 June 1928. An athlete
>> from the start, he dedicated his teenage years excelling in football
>> (a.k.a. American soccer). He had no interest in bodybuilding until, at
>> age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen. Upon learning that
>> Cohen lifted weights at his friend's house, Reg Park joined in with
>> curiosity. Unlike today's proliferation of modern gym equipment,
>> Park's legendary physique would grow from barbells, dumbbells and a
>> simple chinning bar."
>>
>> At age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen? Awesome. )
>>
>> --
>> Curt
>
>"David" is a very common name for the Jewish community.
>
>I know a very good Emergency Room physician that specializes in
>nutrition on the side in his private practice.
>
>His name is Dr. David Cohen.

A *nurse* with a private practice? Does that even happen outside of adult films?

In article <7a2ml3t3goh7qlc3uo2kgogjrjr3v8spaj@4ax.com>,
Lucas Buck <sbcpark@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:

> >"David" is a very common name for the Jewish community.
> >
> >I know a very good Emergency Room physician that specializes in
> >nutrition on the side in his private practice.
> >
> >His name is Dr. David Cohen.
>
> A *nurse* with a private practice? Does that even happen outside of adult
> films?

One could only wonder... <smirk>
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein

<muzician21@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b36d0a3-2bef-4117-b1fd-ae10fb6b74a3@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 6, 8:38 am, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > Not sure about Dickerson's status but neither of the Mentzer brothers
>> > have a life, period. Literally. They both died several years ago under
>> > unusual circumstances
>>
>> Hearts stopping in America is suddenly unusual?
>
>
> Their both dying within 48 hours of each other seems unusual. You can
> posit various explantions, it's still unusual.
>
>
>
>> > Apparently all the 'roiding caught up with them.
>>
>> Dickerson's alive and healthy
>
>
> Not everyone is effected identically by exposure to agents known to
> cause health problems.
>
>
>> while the Mentzer brothers were more
>> likely cut down by their own family history so far as health goes
>> rather than steroid use.
>
>
> And certainly it's implausible that years of juicing played any
> contributing factor in two guys dying in their 40's. Not even worth
> considering that on the list of long-term effects can be
> cardiovascular problems and organ damage.
>
> Taking 'roids other than to treat a medical condition is stupid.
> Well, unless one firmly believes that being a bit bigger and stronger/
> faster for a while is fully worth risking compromising one's long-term
> health.

Why do people like you who know NOTHING about anabolic steroids make such
comments? You are yet another anonymous dolt who has no idea of what he
speaks. You are a lemming.



--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

On Dec 8, 1:15 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:07 -0600, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article
> ><eea5eaff-b108-416b-a61c-4e165b794...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> > Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Dec 8, 12:41 pm, TranslucentAmoebae <transamoe...@seanet.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> [...]
>
> >> > So was Reg like the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder... or what...???
>
> >> I'm not sure what you mean, but from my perspective I'd say that Eugen
> >> Sandow was the first man to treat or market his physique as 'Body as
> >> Art'. On the other hand Michelangelo, Da Vinci, et al. certainly
> >> treated the human body as art.
>
> >> Here's a link to a radio show that offers a retrospective on Reg Park,
> >> actor and physique competitor:
>
> >>http://a1703.g.akamai.net/7/1703/218...ca.download.ak...
> >> 27302/wm.na-central/Solomon/Solomon112607.wma
> >> akahttp://tinyurl.com/2tk8bf
>
> >> Interesting trivia that one of the radio personalities offered was
> >> that Park won the Mr. Universe competition and then returned to win it
> >> again... fourteen years later. How many athletes are considered the
> >> best and then 14 years later are still considered the best? So, was
> >> Reg the first 'Body as Art' Body Builder? Perhaps not, but there's no
> >> question that he is a true legend of the sport and art of
> >> bodybuilding.
>
> >> Note to MFW readers, David Cohen specifically:
>
> >> Hey, did someone from MFW edit the Reg Park Wiki entry? Check this:
>
> >> "Reg Park was born in Yorkshire, England on 7 June 1928. An athlete
> >> from the start, he dedicated his teenage years excelling in football
> >> (a.k.a. American soccer). He had no interest in bodybuilding until, at
> >> age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen. Upon learning that
> >> Cohen lifted weights at his friend's house, Reg Park joined in with
> >> curiosity. Unlike today's proliferation of modern gym equipment,
> >> Park's legendary physique would grow from barbells, dumbbells and a
> >> simple chinning bar."
>
> >> At age 16, Park met a muscleman named David Cohen? Awesome. )
>
> >> --
> >> Curt
>
> >"David" is a very common name for the Jewish community.
>
> >I know a very good Emergency Room physician that specializes in
> >nutrition on the side in his private practice.
>
> >His name is Dr. David Cohen.
>
> A *nurse* with a private practice? Does that even happen outside of adult films?

i just love, love, love it when i see someone using an obscure
celebrity name...!

On Dec 5, 9:53 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> It's true -- that pro bodybuilder physique is something of an acquired
> taste. I remember first coming across a muscle magazine as a kid: I
> wasn't fascinated or impressed, I was shocked and disgusted! And I
> don't remember any of the girls swooning over how "cute" (as they
> would say) these guys looked.

Then you found out how fun it was to sit on the washer on spin cycle
and imagine
those hot sweaty bodys rubbing against your nubile skin....

ordosclan@gmail.com

On Dec 5, 12:16 am, "Don Meredith" <donniefootb...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hesse is the kind of writer that gets thrown at teenagers when they are
> hitting drugs, alcohol, etc. (college) and he makes an impression. I liked
> Siddhartha, but the second time I tried to read it I went HO-HUM and put it
> down.

Stuff you read on a rainy day in your first year of college but you
grow out of it and
smirk when you see another generation of know-nothings that have
discovered
beer, pot, and lame writers, and even lamer drug scribbles inspired by
such.

> For all of Hesse's Eastern Philosophy, he made sure to put his name on every
> book and to milk his fame for everything it was worth. Hesse was part of the
> Dalai Lama faction of Eastern Philosophy celebrities who preach austerity,
> etc., but are checking the interest on their CD accounts and buying new
> limousines every year.

Austerity bhahahahahahah

ordosclan@gmail.com

On Dec 6, 9:32 am, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And why did she wait until Arnold was a politician to come forward and
> start this shit?
> --
> Peace, Om

It came out before. He's always doing stuff like that. Which is why
he made the apology to "all those he might have hurt in the past". It
was on Jay leno where a Jay (?) was talking about how arnold likes to
play pranks like during a photoshoot with leno on the other side of a
old woman and he reaches behind and grabs a 80 year old womans ass and
says "Jay stop". The person on the couch said: "thats not a joke it a
lawsuit".

ordosclan@gmail.com

<ordosclan@arnold likes to play pranks like during a photoshoot with leno on
the other side of a old woman and he reaches behind and grabs a 80 year old
womans ass and says "Jay stop". The person on the couch said: "thats not a
joke it a
> lawsuit".
>
>
His Dad was putting people into ovens, so Arnold is much tamer by
comparison. Give him a break. He has money, he had a great body, he liked to
grope chicks. At least he wasn't a homo.

In article <F629j.23769$_m.22285@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"Ted Sherman" <tedsherman103983@yahoo.com> wrote:

> <ordosclan@arnold likes to play pranks like during a photoshoot with leno on
> the other side of a old woman and he reaches behind and grabs a 80 year old
> womans ass and says "Jay stop". The person on the couch said: "thats not a
> joke it a
> > lawsuit".
> >
> >
> His Dad was putting people into ovens, so Arnold is much tamer by
> comparison. Give him a break. He has money, he had a great body, he liked to
> grope chicks. At least he wasn't a homo.

But that'd get him the Liberal votes...
--
Peace, Om

Remove - (dash) to validate gmail.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein