Warning to Cohen

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:46:06 -0000, David Cohen <sammiesdad@gmail.com> wrote:

>JMW <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> Do NOT take your handgun into the MRI suite!
>>
>> http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/5/1092
>
>Although i would never carry any substantial piece of metal into an
>MRI, I hadn't considered the fact that the magnet could essentially
>cause various safeties to fail to engage. Interesting.
>
>David

The ultimate safety mechanism is your original Wilson Combat mags in your Kimber.


nee ner nee ner nee ner

I scribbled:
> Lucas Buck wrote:
> > David Cohen wrote:
> > >JMW wrote:
> > >> Do NOT take your handgun into the MRI suite!
>
> > >> http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/5/1092
>
> > > Although i would never carry any substantial piece of metal into an
> > > MRI, I hadn't considered the fact that the magnet could essentially
> > > cause various safeties to fail to engage. Interesting.
>
> > > David
>
> > The ultimate safety mechanism is your original Wilson Combat mags in your Kimber.
>
> > nee ner nee ner nee ner
>
> Oooh! I smell a story here.
>
> (Googles)
>
> <snip>
> Curt, yeah, bored

And for anyone else bored:

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....rch+this+group
aka http://tinyurl.com/3braj4

--

Lucas Buck wrote:
> David Cohen wrote:
> >JMW wrote:
> >> Do NOT take your handgun into the MRI suite!
>
> >> http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/5/1092
>
> > Although i would never carry any substantial piece of metal into an
> > MRI, I hadn't considered the fact that the magnet could essentially
> > cause various safeties to fail to engage. Interesting.
>
> > David
>
> The ultimate safety mechanism is your original Wilson Combat mags in your Kimber.
>
> nee ner nee ner nee ner

Oooh! I smell a story here.

(Googles)

--
Curt, yeah, bored

In article <1183165058.929975.80160@n60g2000hse.googlegroups. com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Correct again. Basically. What I know encompasses:
>
> a) Don't point a gun at anyone, even if you think it's unloaded.
> b) Don't draw a gun (well, otoh...
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...9191191191911A
> AA.jpg
> ) unless you intend to actually shoot someone.
> c) The barrel points "that way."
>
> Pretty much it.
>
> Regardless, I earned marksman with the .45 and qualified with an M-14.
> Also qualified with a 12 gauge (which amounts to shooting a hay bale)
> and was a .50 cal machine gun operator. I could strip one down, put it
> back together, set the timing, and fire off rounds. Could I do it
> today, after not having seen a machine gun in nearly 20 years? No.

<sigh>

For once I have to disagree with you Curt.

Basic firearm safety encompasses far more than the above.

Please read here and educate yourself, as I have done:

http://www.nrahq.org/education/guide.asp

Cheers and happy (SAFE!!!) shooting!
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Om wrote:
> Curt wrote:

re guns

> > <snip> What I know encompasses:
>
> > a) Don't point a gun at anyone, even if you think it's unloaded.
> > b) Don't draw a gun <snip> unless you intend to actually shoot someone.
> > c) The barrel points "that way."
>
> > Pretty much it.
[...]

Without looking immediately at the provided link/information, I'd like
to preface my comments by stating that I never even GOT to actually
pulling the trigger, Om.

> <sigh>
>
> For once I have to disagree with you Curt.

Once? You've only disagreed with me ONCE? Now I see your problem. ;o)

Gee, I wish JWM didn't have that pesky kill file on me. I bet he'd
back me up on this: DISAGREE WITH ME LOTS!

> Basic firearm safety encompasses far more than the above.
>
> Please read here and educate yourself, as I have done:
>
> http://www.nrahq.org/education/guide.asp

Okay.

> Cheers and happy (SAFE!!!) shooting!

Haven't used a gun in many moons. Lots of other items on my shopping
list before I get to armaments. Regardless, I'll reciprocate and wish
you happy and safe shooting as well, Om. )

--
Curt

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:

>> > Our penises.

>> Yeah, that too.

> But not your Moroccan population.

> (ducks, runs, screams)

> Curt, with the BIG apology

You are going...to regret this ;-O

--
Pete

Pete wrote:
> "Curt" schreef:

re tiny schtufff

> > But not your Moroccan population.
> > (ducks, runs, screams)
> > Curt, with the BIG apology
>
> You are going...to regret this

Dammit.

> ;-O

)

--
Curt

Pete wrote:
> "Charles" schreef:
>
> >>You have joanne kill filed?
> > Only in the traditional "alleged" way! ;o)
>
> Eh... no thats *alleged* instead of "alleged" and its "kill-file" instead of
> *kill-file.*

You are going...to regret this.

Wait! I meant *You* are going...to "regret" this.

Hold on, hold on, actually, I meant "Listen, I sincerely apologize for
that Moroccan comment, okay?"

--
Curt

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> schreef:

>>You have joanne kill filed?

> Only in the traditional "alleged" way! ;o)

Eh... no thats *alleged* instead of "alleged" and its "kill-file" instead of
*kill-file.*

--
Pete

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:

>> > But not your Moroccan population.
>> > (ducks, runs, screams)
>> > Curt, with the BIG apology

>> You are going...to regret this

> Dammit.

>> ;-O

> )

What are you doing up at this hour?

Oh, forgot to mention;

Saw Die Hard 4.0 Friday.

Damn, that WAS dissapointing! Good action scenes, especially the cars that
flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.

The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the thrill.
Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part 1.
Or 3, for that matter.

Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
He should have had a better side-kick.

--
Pete

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:

>> >>You have joanne kill filed?
>> > Only in the traditional "alleged" way! ;o)

>> Eh... no thats *alleged* instead of "alleged" and its "kill-file" instead
>> of
>> *kill-file.*

> You are going...to regret this.

> Wait! I meant *You* are going...to "regret" this.

Eh... that should be;

*You* are going to... "regret" *this.*

> Hold on, hold on, actually, I meant "Listen, I sincerely apologize for
> that Moroccan comment, okay?"

No you dont.

--
Pete

Pete wrote:
[...]

> What are you doing up at this hour?

Yeah, it's nearly 5 a.m. on my side. Anyway, typically, I revolve to a
third-shift preference during summer vacation. I always worked shift
work prior to teaching and am basically nocturnal. Dunno why.
Circadian somethingsomething?

> Oh, forgot to mention;
>
> Saw Die Hard 4.0 Friday.
>
> Damn, that WAS dissapointing!

Crap.

> Good action scenes, especially the cars that
> flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
> Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.

Yeah, I saw that one in the trailer or preview. Awesome shot.

> The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the thrill.
> Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part 1.
> Or 3, for that matter.

I'm saddened to read this. Hope the rest of the planet disagrees with
you. Would like to see Bruce have another hit. I thought '16
Blocks' ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0450232/ ) kicked some serious
ass.

> Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
> He should have had a better side-kick.

Bah!

Sorry that you didn't enjoy it, Pete.

HAVE you seen anything good lately? I finally rented 'Dreamgirls' and
that was pretty good. And I enjoyed 'Hannibal Rising' but it wasn't
especially horrific. MORE GORE, MORE GORE! (Otoh, I wouldn't go near
the 'Saw' franchise. No.)

--
Curt

Pete wrote:
[...]

> No you dont.

No, i ~*DO!*~

(But, yeah, not as much as I regret not purchasing some Ben and
Jerry's ice cream while I was out earlier this evening. DAMN IT ALL!)

--
Curt

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:26:39 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl>
wrote:

>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> schreef:
>
>>>You have joanne kill filed?
>
>> Only in the traditional "alleged" way! ;o)
>
>Eh... no thats *alleged* instead of "alleged" and its "kill-file" instead of
>*kill-file.*

Since when have you been a 'net-nanny' Dutchman, or is that
"net-nanny" or *net-nanny* or net nanny or "Dutchman" or Dutch man?

Er... who gives a fuck?

Have a great Sunday Dutchman (or is that "Dutch man"?) - you know I
intend to! ;o)

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:

>> No you dont.

> No, i ~*DO!*~

Okay, you convinced me.

> (But, yeah, not as much as I regret not purchasing some Ben and
> Jerry's ice cream while I was out earlier this evening. DAMN IT ALL!)

When i am in bed, i always regret buying those big hunks of cheese.
But i had some last night. Why am i telling this?

I dont know, but i sure as hell like to eat big hunks of cheese (48+) while
i am in bed.

--
Pete

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> schreef:

>>> Only in the traditional "alleged" way! ;o)

>>Eh... no thats *alleged* instead of "alleged" and its "kill-file" instead
>>of
>>*kill-file.*

> Since when have you been a 'net-nanny' Dutchman..

Haha!

> or is that
> "net-nanny" or *net-nanny* or net nanny or "Dutchman" or Dutch man?

Its "net-nanny" and its **DUTCHMAN** !

> Er... who gives a fuck?

Nobody ;-O

> Have a great Sunday Dutchman (or is that "Dutch man"?) - you know I
> intend to! ;o)

You too.

--
Pete

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:

>> Good action scenes, especially the cars that
>> flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
>> Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.

> Yeah, I saw that one in the trailer or preview. Awesome shot.

Yeah, and it bounced on two other cars, with Bruce and his side-kick in
between those cars.

The scene with the jet was whortwhile too.

>> The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the
>> thrill.
>> Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part
>> 1.
>> Or 3, for that matter.

> I'm saddened to read this. Hope the rest of the planet disagrees with
> you.

There wasnt much response from the audience as well. And it was opening
weekend.
That usually says enough.

> Would like to see Bruce have another hit. I thought '16
> Blocks' ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0450232/ ) kicked some serious
> ass.

I bought Sin City a few days ago. Saw that in the same theatre. Awesome.
Both the sound AND graphic effects.

Did you see it? In SS, a certain actor makes a reference to a certain movie
he played in.

Do you which actor and which movie? And the reference? Its a one-liner, with
only four words.

Prior to that, another actor calls him something, and thats a reference to
that same movie. Shouldnt be too difficult.

>> Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
>> He should have had a better side-kick.

> Bah!

> Sorry that you didn't enjoy it, Pete.

It was humorless. Well, almost. And no real thrill.

> HAVE you seen anything good lately?

As mentioned before, Death Proof. But most people will disagree.

And i bought Sin City. I am going to rent Deja-Vu, Dreamgirls, The Departed,
Smokin Aces (saw that one in the theatre..) and the The good Shepherd.

I will rent Oceans 13 in a few months or so.

> I finally rented 'Dreamgirls' and
> that was pretty good. And I enjoyed 'Hannibal Rising' but it wasn't
> especially horrific. MORE GORE, MORE GORE! (Otoh, I wouldn't go near
> the 'Saw' franchise. No.)

I didnt like saw.
Silence of the Lambs was worth it (its just that i dont like Jodie foster,
aside from her role in Taxi Driver, whis was pretty good...) but everything
that followed up SOTL was a bit crappy.

I will see TransFormers. The CGI must be mindblowing.

--
Pete

In article <1183249618.746296.112690@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups. com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Without looking immediately at the provided link/information, I'd like
> to preface my comments by stating that I never even GOT to actually
> pulling the trigger, Om.

No arguments there, but still. ;-)
Do you believe that there is such a thing as an AD (accidental
discharge?) With the exception of the MRI incident, most people on the
gun lists agree that most AD's are ND's. (Negligent discharges).

>
> > <sigh>
> >
> > For once I have to disagree with you Curt.
>
> Once? You've only disagreed with me ONCE? Now I see your problem. ;o)
>
> Gee, I wish JWM didn't have that pesky kill file on me. I bet he'd
> back me up on this: DISAGREE WITH ME LOTS!
>
> > Basic firearm safety encompasses far more than the above.
> >
> > Please read here and educate yourself, as I have done:
> >
> > http://www.nrahq.org/education/guide.asp
>
> Okay.
>
> > Cheers and happy (SAFE!!!) shooting!
>
> Haven't used a gun in many moons. Lots of other items on my shopping
> list before I get to armaments. Regardless, I'll reciprocate and wish
> you happy and safe shooting as well, Om. )

Get thee hence to the range!

If nothing else, it's a good forearm workout.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:38:58 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl>
wrote:

>Saw Die Hard 4.0 Friday.
>
>Damn, that WAS dissapointing! Good action scenes, especially the cars that
>flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
>Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.
>
>The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the thrill.
>Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part 1.
>Or 3, for that matter.
>
>Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
>He should have had a better side-kick.

I'll counter this: I liked DH4 - in fact, I've already paid to see
it twice. The action pieces are great, though I'll concede the
dialogue isn't as good as 1 or 3. It's an action movie truism that the
bad guy makes the film, and Tim Olyphant wasn't quite there as the bad
guy. Honestly, though, there will never be another Hans Gruber - Alan
Rickman set the standard too high in the first film.
The best line in this one went to McClane's daughter Lucy, when the
bad guys give her the phone and tell her to warn her dad off.
"Dad, there are only 5 of them left."
epbrown
--
How can you know where I'm at if you haven't been where I been?
Can you see where I'm coming from? "How I Could Just Kill A Man" Cypress Hill

Pete wrote:
[...]

> When i am in bed, i always regret buying those big hunks of cheese.
> But i had some last night. Why am i telling this?
>
> I dont know, but i sure as hell like to eat big hunks of cheese (48+) while
> i am in bed.

Protein is important schtufff.

--
Curt

Om wrote:
[...]

> Do you believe that there is such a thing as an AD (accidental
> discharge?)

Ask Cohen. I know nothing about guns.

Oh, what the heck. Ignorance of a subject has never stopped me from
commenting previously! D

Ahem.

> With the exception of the MRI incident, most people on the
> gun lists agree that most AD's are ND's. (Negligent discharges).

What if there's a manufacturer's defect in the equipment? What
constitutes an accidental discharge? A round going off
unintentionally? If it shoots you in the foot but harms no one else,
is that negligent? Ow.

(Can we talk about basketball instead? There were no ND's on the
court.)

[...]

> > Haven't used a gun in many moons. Lots of other items on my shopping
> > list before I get to armaments. Regardless, I'll reciprocate and wish
> > you happy and safe shooting as well, Om. )
>
> Get thee hence to the range!
>
> If nothing else, it's a good forearm workout.

I guess Popeye woulda made an excellent marksman.

--
Curt

In article <1183341525.216103.151840@n60g2000hse.googlegroups .com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Om wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Do you believe that there is such a thing as an AD (accidental
> > discharge?)
>
> Ask Cohen. I know nothing about guns.
>
> Oh, what the heck. Ignorance of a subject has never stopped me from
> commenting previously! D
>
> Ahem.
>
> > With the exception of the MRI incident, most people on the
> > gun lists agree that most AD's are ND's. (Negligent discharges).
>
> What if there's a manufacturer's defect in the equipment? What
> constitutes an accidental discharge? A round going off
> unintentionally? If it shoots you in the foot but harms no one else,
> is that negligent? Ow.

Basically, some idiot had their finger on the trigger when they should
not have.

The best safety on a gun exists between the ears of said handler.
($1.00 to Rothstein on tx.guns).

>
> (Can we talk about basketball instead? There were no ND's on the
> court.)

Yeah. GO SPURS!!!

Oh never mind, they won the NBA Championship again this year <gloat>.

>
> [...]
>
> > > Haven't used a gun in many moons. Lots of other items on my shopping
> > > list before I get to armaments. Regardless, I'll reciprocate and wish
> > > you happy and safe shooting as well, Om. )
> >
> > Get thee hence to the range!
> >
> > If nothing else, it's a good forearm workout.
>
> I guess Popeye woulda made an excellent marksman.

<snicker>

>
> --
> Curt
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Om wrote:

re AD (accidental discharge

> Basically, some idiot had their finger on the trigger when they should
> not have.

Operator error versus machine failure, eh? I can see the first
happening more often than the latter. Like the People magazine story
of the father who shot the son accidentally while they were hunting
and then killed himself in despair. Or the other father who shot his
daughter thinking she was an intruder in their home, her last words "I
love you." Bigtime operator error.

> The best safety on a gun exists between the ears of said handler.
> ($1.00 to Rothstein on tx.guns).

Agreed. The hunting father should have known where the rest of his
party was before firing. (He had two sons with him that day.) The home
intrusion father was caught by surprise as his daughter lept out of a
closet, fired blindly or in a panic. It's obviously tragic, but also
an indication of poor preparation, poor planning, and poor execution.

--
Curt

"E Brown" <three1983s@att.net> schreef:

> I'll counter this: I liked DH4 - in fact, I've already paid to see
> it twice. The action pieces are great, though I'll concede the
> dialogue isn't as good as 1 or 3. It's an action movie truism that the
> bad guy makes the film, and Tim Olyphant wasn't quite there as the bad
> guy. Honestly, though, there will never be another Hans Gruber - Alan
> Rickman set the standard too high in the first film.

Die Hard was probably THE best action movie of the eighties.

"I will count to three... there will NOT be a forth count..."

<Black dude collecting money from Germanic dude>

"I told you...."

<Takagi>

"You want money !?!?!?" What kind of terrorists are you !?!?!?"

<Gruber>

"Hehehehe... WHO says we are terrorists ?!?!?!"

And of course, the scene with the coke addicted company bigshot...

"You want em... and i can give him to ya!""

"Common Hanz, whats with the gun, this is not method acting..."

> The best line in this one went to McClane's daughter Lucy, when the
> bad guys give her the phone and tell her to warn her dad off.
> "Dad, there are only 5 of them left."

But she forgot to say;

HO___HO____HO

--
Pete

In article <1183351920.950070.33500@c77g2000hse.googlegroups. com>,
Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

> Om wrote:
>
> re AD (accidental discharge
>
> > Basically, some idiot had their finger on the trigger when they should
> > not have.
>
> Operator error versus machine failure, eh? I can see the first
> happening more often than the latter. Like the People magazine story
> of the father who shot the son accidentally while they were hunting
> and then killed himself in despair. Or the other father who shot his
> daughter thinking she was an intruder in their home, her last words "I
> love you." Bigtime operator error.

Indeed.
Violation of major gun safety rule #2:

"Always be sure of your target and what is beyond it."
Once you pull that trigger, you can never take it back.

>
> > The best safety on a gun exists between the ears of said handler.
> > ($1.00 to Rothstein on tx.guns).
>
> Agreed. The hunting father should have known where the rest of his
> party was before firing. (He had two sons with him that day.) The home
> intrusion father was caught by surprise as his daughter lept out of a
> closet, fired blindly or in a panic. It's obviously tragic, but also
> an indication of poor preparation, poor planning, and poor execution.
>
> --
> Curt

<snort> "Execution" being the key word there. :-(
If I were ever to shoot an innocent child like that, I'd probably turn
the gun on myself too...

Not sure I could live with that.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:38:58 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl>
wrote:

>"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> schreef:
>
>>> > But not your Moroccan population.
>>> > (ducks, runs, screams)
>>> > Curt, with the BIG apology
>
>>> You are going...to regret this
>
>> Dammit.
>
>>> ;-O
>
>> )
>
>What are you doing up at this hour?
>
>Oh, forgot to mention;
>
>Saw Die Hard 4.0 Friday.
>
>Damn, that WAS dissapointing! Good action scenes, especially the cars that
>flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
>Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.
>
>The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the thrill.
>Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part 1.
>Or 3, for that matter.
>
>Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
>He should have had a better side-kick.

I almost went to see DH4 for the second time last night. The show
started at 7:15 and I didn't check for showtimes until 7:30. Had I
made it home from the bike ride (um, had the wind been at my back a
bit more -- or had I been more of a manly man and cranked a little
harder) a bit earlier I'd have gone.

The movie was exactly what I thought it would be. A lot whole lot of
too-impossible-to-ever-happen stuff. The cars, the jet, the semi (all
of which I think I've seen in the commercials).

It was good for a tub and a half of popcorn (No butter. I'm watching
my figure.)

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:29:25 +0200, "Pete" <phoutstra@wanadoo.nl>
wrote:

>Die Hard was probably THE best action movie of the eighties.

The 80s has some serious contenders - you had Arnie and Sly at
their peaks, remember. But yeah, Die Hard is right up there, way up
there.
epbrown
--
How can you know where I'm at if you haven't been where I been?
Can you see where I'm coming from? "How I Could Just Kill A Man" Cypress Hill

d wells wrote:
[...]

> I almost went to see DH4 for the second time last night. The show
> started at 7:15 and I didn't check for showtimes until 7:30. Had I
> made it home from the bike ride (um, had the wind been at my back a
> bit more -- or had I been more of a manly man and cranked a little
> harder) a bit earlier I'd have gone.
>
> The movie was exactly what I thought it would be. A lot whole lot of
> too-impossible-to-ever-happen stuff. The cars, the jet, the semi (all
> of which I think I've seen in the commercials).
>
> It was good for a tub and a half of popcorn (No butter. I'm watching
> my figure.)

For the record, I just wanted to say, YOU ARE MY HERO!

--

E Brown wrote:
> "Pete" wrote:
>
> > Die Hard was probably THE best action movie of the eighties.
>
> The 80s has some serious contenders - you had Arnie and Sly at
> their peaks, remember. But yeah, Die Hard is right up there, way up
> there.

http://www.fast-rewind.com/

--

Pete wrote:
[...]

> Saw Die Hard 4.0 Friday.
>
> Damn, that WAS dissapointing! Good action scenes, especially the cars that
> flip through the air with more effect than a tennis ball that bounces of
> Serenas bat, but nowhere near the class of the original.
>
> The famous, and funny one-liners were almost absent, and so was the thrill.
> Like i said, a few good action scenes, but nowhere near the class part 1.
> Or 3, for that matter.
>
> Old Bruce doesnt seem to be able to carry this movie by himself anymore.
> He should have had a better side-kick.

Do you think Willis had a say in what the side-kick looked like? I was
sitting in the theater and thought "Geez, that could be Ashton
Kutcher."

Although magazines like People, etc. say how well Willis, Kutcher,
Demi get along... I'm wondering if this wasn't 4.0 at all, but Bruce
Willis saying, "Man, look what I can do and Ashton's sitting in the
corner sniveling."

Anyway, all in all, I wasn't disappointed in the movie. The action and
CG made it a blast for me. And it was cool seeing Kevin Smith in the
flick. The bad guy shoulda been replaced by the guy with the tattoos
up and down his arms, though - much more sinister in appearance, imo.

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

W

A

R

N

I

N

G

Stop! The ending is kindasorta REVEALED below. Stop!

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

W

A

R

N

I

N

G

Hey, you've been warned.

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

W

A

R

N

I

N

G

Hey, would that last action sequence have worked? I can't see how.
Right through A), A) survives and B) does not. Wouldn't A) have acted
as a vest or offered protection for B), slowed down the projectile or
sent it curving up A)'s neck to his brain or perhaps out the side
instead of directly through and into B) with enough BLAMM to finish
the job?

Plus, back to my Ashton question, Willis says, "That's what makes you
that guy now." Or something similiar. I say it's an expensive inside
joke for the Willis-Kutcher household. Forgot to look to see if Willis
is a producer or co-producer. /conspiracy theory

--
Curt

"Curt" <> Do you think Willis had a say in what the side-kick looked like? I
was
> sitting in the theater and thought "Geez, that could be Ashton Kutcher."
>

Willis is kissing Kutcher's ass to make sure that Demi does not cut off his
access to his kids. Look at what Kim Basinger did to that Baldwin brother.
He hasn't seen his kids in years, and the only time he can see his kids is
in a public place like a shopping mall. How fucked is that??

It would not surprise me if Willis asked Kutcher to be in the movie, and
Kutcher said no just because he does not want to be seen as the sidekick
since he is banging Demi Moore's wrinkled twat and pretending it is still
young and not something that got fucked a million times before Kutcher came
along.

Johnny Cumlater wrote:
[...]
> Willis is kissing Kutcher's ass to make sure that Demi does not cut off his
> access to his kids. Look at what Kim Basinger did to that Baldwin brother.
> He hasn't seen his kids in years, and the only time he can see his kids is
> in a public place like a shopping mall. How fucked is that??

Kim Basinger can do NO wrong. She could set Alec on fire (okay, just
the cuff of his shirt), push him down a flight of stairs (can three
steps be counted as a flight?), and then treat him to a Cornwall-spray-
paint-can-thief surprise and I'd cheer her on.

> It would not surprise me if Willis asked Kutcher to be in the movie, and
> Kutcher said no just because he does not want to be seen as the sidekick
> since he is banging

Okay.

> Demi Moore's wrinkled twat and pretending it is still young and not
> something that got fucked a million times before Kutcher came
> along.

Wiki offers "Demi Moore (born November 11, 1961)" which would put Demi
at 45 for a few more months. Have you seen Demi Moore lately? Forty-
five is looking fine, Johnny C.

Wrinkled? Doubtful. Would that we could find out, however that, too,
is doubtful.

And a million times? Perhaps, but I'd bet those hours in the gym (and
not a little bit of surgery, of course) have kept her and her various
parts in excellent condition.

--
Curt

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:06:13 -0000, Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

>Johnny Cumlater wrote:
>[...]
>> Willis is kissing Kutcher's ass to make sure that Demi does not cut off his
>> access to his kids. Look at what Kim Basinger did to that Baldwin brother.
>> He hasn't seen his kids in years, and the only time he can see his kids is
>> in a public place like a shopping mall. How fucked is that??
>
>Kim Basinger can do NO wrong. She could set Alec on fire (okay, just
>the cuff of his shirt), push him down a flight of stairs (can three
>steps be counted as a flight?), and then treat him to a Cornwall-spray-
>paint-can-thief surprise and I'd cheer her on.
>
>> It would not surprise me if Willis asked Kutcher to be in the movie, and
>> Kutcher said no just because he does not want to be seen as the sidekick
>> since he is banging
>
>Okay.
>
>> Demi Moore's wrinkled twat and pretending it is still young and not
>> something that got fucked a million times before Kutcher came
>> along.
>
>Wiki offers "Demi Moore (born November 11, 1961)" which would put Demi
>at 45 for a few more months. Have you seen Demi Moore lately? Forty-
>five is looking fine, Johnny C.


Johnny C, Jack Mehoffer, Smegmata, Ralph, Tommy, Straight Arrow, Sam
Sloan, Lose Weight or Die, ...

A rose by any other name.

"d wells" <> A rose by any other name.>>

What is it to you? You don't want me to post here Sherlock? You don't have a
wife or a hobby?

I was not looking at the photo of the gun, but the small photo of the gun in
the holster in the MRI. I did not even scroll down to see the other photo.
The actual gun looks more like a Combat Commander than an actual full size
1911.

--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/


"Hard Bop Drums" <nospam@hardbopdrums.com> wrote in message
news:jX4hi.9415$oh3.6162@newsfe03.phx...
>
> "JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
> news:rqv8839mj1ms88f623i5m4kvg2bt1mvun6@4ax.com...
>> Do NOT take your handgun into the MRI suite!
>>
>> http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/5/1092
>
>
> John,
> Take a look at the photo. Does that look like a 1911 to you? It looks more
> like a SW 645 type to me, but it is not a very good photo either.
>
>
> --
> Robert Schuh
> "Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
> intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
> the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
> the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
> - Nietzsche
>
> http://www.hardbopdrums.com/
>