Weight loss.

It's true what they say - all you need to do is watch what you eat,
and expend more energy than you consume. It's really that simple. You
can quit reading this list now, you now know everything you need to
know...
Is it so easy???

http://weight-losstips.blogspot.com/

Actually, what I can quit reading is all the obnoxious blogspot spam.

travolta001@gmail.com wrote:
| It's true what they say - all you need to do is watch what you eat,
| and expend more energy than you consume. It's really that simple. You
| can quit reading this list now, you now know everything you need to
| know...
| Is it so easy???
|
| http://weight-losstips.blogspot.com/

<travolta001@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182556700.789023.5520@i13g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com...
> It's true what they say - all you need to do is watch what you eat,
> and expend more energy than you consume. It's really that simple. You
> can quit reading this list now, you now know everything you need to
> know...
> Is it so easy???
>
> http://weight-losstips.blogspot.com/
>


This fucking SPAMMER really has come into a league of his/her own. How the
fuck does one do an article related to fitness etc. and not know how to
spell "metabolism?"



-- --Robert Schuh"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and the fair, modest,
submissive and conforming mentality, the mediocrity of desires attains moral
designations and honors" - Nietzschehttp://www.hardbopdrums.com/

Robert Schuh aka "Hard Bop Drums" wrote:
> travolta...@gmail wrote

> > It's true what they say - all you need to do is watch what you eat,
> > and expend more energy than you consume. It's really that simple. You
> > can quit reading this list now, you now know everything you need to
> > know...
> > Is it so easy???
>
> > http://weight-losstips.blogspot.com/
>
> This [expletive deleted] SPAMMER really has come into a league
> of his/her own. How the [expletive deleted] does one do an article
> related to fitness etc. and not know how to spell "metabolism?"
[...]

Ha! You clicked the link. Hey, so did I but *after* you complained
about the spelling. Hey, I'm a sucker for speeling erroars. ;o) But
you're wrong about that, of course. The spammer spells metabolism
correctly repeatedly throughout the rest of their page.

So which is worse - one typo or cross-posting some whining BS to
alt.support.diabetes, alt.support.diet, and sci.med.nutrition? Oh,
THEY're interested. Yeah, yeah, that's MY whining BS. No charge!

--
Curt

"Curt" <> Ha! You clicked the link. >

It is like Rob sucking down bodybuilder sperm all those years and not
knowing how to spell homosexual.

Sam Slone wrote:
> "Curt" <> Ha! You clicked the link. >
>
> It is like Rob sucking down bodybuilder sperm all those
> years and not knowing how to spell homosexual.

Sam,

As much as I like to slam Robert over a few of what I consider his
failings - reposting spam URL, overuse of the f word, calling people
bigots in one breath and then offering his own, imo, bigoted
aspersions in the next breath - I'm not ready to endorse your comments
wrt him performing oral sex on bodybuilders. I mean, if he did and he
enjoyed it, well, okay. For him. If he didn't and your telling a tale
designed to get his goat or as a way of using the term homosexual in a
pejorative manner, well, I'm not sure I'm okay with that.

Hmm.

Have I told lies to get that proverbial goat of JWM or Will or anyone
else? I don't think so. I've had plenty of tales told about me and
just think it reflects on the storyteller.

And, fwiw, I'd be willing to bet that there's at least one person on
this planet who's swallowed without having the ability to spell
homosexual correctly. I mean, it's a big planet, right? (Googles)
Yeesh! The count's around 6.6 billion? What happened to four billion?
Wow. Anyway, generally, people make spelling mistakes. Homosexual has
a lot of syllables. I've seen sexual spelled sexaul at least once,
iirc. Plus 'bert's no stranger to typos. He's missed affect versus
effect at least one time, so why not homosexual? The spelling. I don't
care if he is or if he isn't.

--
Curt

"Curt" <I'd be willing to bet that there's at least one person on this
planet who's swallowed without having the ability to spell homosexual
correctly. Anyway, generally, people make spelling mistakes. Homosexual has
a lot of syllables. I've seen sexual spelled sexaul at least once. Plus
'bert's no stranger to typos.>

Well I don't mind that Rob can't spell homosexual as long as he swallows. I
am willing to teach him how to spell. I used to tutor retarded kids as part
of my community service back when I was on probation.

Sam Slone wrote:
[...]

> Well I don't mind that Rob can't spell homosexual

Are you sure about that? They must have covered that word in prep
school. Otoh, I suppose there are homophobic prep schools where they
don't cover certain words, etc.

> as long as he swallows.

Ovaltine? His pride? Oh, that. Forget I asked.

> I am willing to teach him how to spell.

That's generous of you, Sam.

> I used to tutor retarded kids

Generous and equally PC. Ahem.

[...]

--
Curt

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:29:29 -0400, "Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>"Curt" <I'd be willing to bet that there's at least one person on this
>planet who's swallowed without having the ability to spell homosexual
>correctly. Anyway, generally, people make spelling mistakes. Homosexual has
>a lot of syllables. I've seen sexual spelled sexaul at least once. Plus
>'bert's no stranger to typos.>
>
>Well I don't mind that Rob can't spell homosexual as long as he swallows. I
>am willing to teach him how to spell. I used to tutor retarded kids as part
>of my community service back when I was on probation.
>

And it is important to you that he swallows because when you imagine
him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting ruins the fantasy
for you?

<dhamilton@> And it is important to you that he swallows because when you
imagine
> him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting ruins the fantasy for
you?>>

You're a regular Sherlock Homo. But now that you mention it, I do often look
at his webpage to see his girlish waist and steroid-induced bitch-tits, and
I imagine grasping him firmly by the hips and bending him over a barbell on
a bench press and thrusting into him mercilessly as his thin tapered waist
squirms in my grasp and then pulling out just before cumming and letting him
drop to his knees and gobble the shit-covered knob until the chocolatey goo
shot deep into his throat and he would grin with the shit-sluice dribbling
out of his mouth and say, "That was as good as _________(insert name of
famous bodybuilder here)!" and I would pull my shorts back up and look
around the gym, embarassed at the looks of the straight chicks and surprised
to see the bold lust in the faces of the many fruity guys at the gym.

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:51:22 -0400, "Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com>
wrote:

><dhamilton@> And it is important to you that he swallows because when you
>imagine
>> him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting ruins the fantasy for
>you?>>
>
>You're a regular Sherlock Homo.

I think you mean "You're a regular Jack-me-off Mason." That would be
a play on Jackie Mason, a comic, and the comment you reference leans
more toward being funny than it does toward being anything that would
have suggested deductive reasoning had been used to arrive at a
conclusion.

(Curt had provided that.)

I think "Jerk-me Seinfeld" would have worked as well.

How about "Mitch Give-me-Hedburg?"

"John Bel-oh-me" (for Belushi ... I don't know that I really like it)

A Michael Richards reference seems to be more appropriate, but I can't
think of a way to make it work. (And I'm not weighing in with an
opinion of MR here, I'm just saying that based on recent press it
would be fitting.)

"Larry Bend-Over-The-Table Guy"

"Joey's Bishop" (One of the Brits at work used to make a comment about
'buffing the Bishop' or something like that. "You're a regular Joey's
Bishop" then would suggest "You're a regular dick." It does lack any
form of homosexual reference but I think it makes up for that by its
international appeal (please see "Brits" above) and it harkens back to
a time (late 50's early 60's ... whenever it was the Rat Packers were
running around) when America was a kinder, gentler, place and gas was
damn-near free and flowing right out of the ground.

>But now that you mention it, I do often look
>at his webpage to see his girlish waist and steroid-induced bitch-tits, and
>I imagine grasping him firmly by the hips and bending him over a barbell on
>a bench press and thrusting into him mercilessly as his thin tapered waist
>squirms in my grasp and then pulling out just before cumming and letting him
>drop to his knees and gobble the shit-covered knob until the chocolatey goo
>shot deep into his throat and he would grin with the shit-sluice dribbling
>out of his mouth and say, "That was as good as _________(insert name of
>famous bodybuilder here)!" and I would pull my shorts back up and look
>around the gym, embarassed at the looks of the straight chicks and surprised
>to see the bold lust in the faces of the many fruity guys at the gym.
>

"Well, you gotta follow that dream wherever that dream may lead
You gotta follow that dream to find the love you need"

Nobody says it better than The King.

"d wells" <d.wells40@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c6bu735igf6jsqhi0lj6a7cf8bqcojg3g5@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:51:22 -0400, "Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>><dhamilton@> And it is important to you that he swallows because when you
>>imagine
>>> him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting ruins the fantasy
>>> for
>>you?>>
>>
>>You're a regular Sherlock Homo.
>
> I think you mean "You're a regular Jack-me-off Mason." That would be
> a play on Jackie Mason, a comic, and the comment you reference leans
> more toward being funny than it does toward being anything that would
> have suggested deductive reasoning had been used to arrive at a
> conclusion.
>
> (Curt had provided that.)
>
> I think "Jerk-me Seinfeld" would have worked as well.
>
> How about "Mitch Give-me-Hedburg?"
.....

In a similar connection, my favorite nickname that Dan Patrick gave a
baseball player was Bert "Be Home" Byleven. And Jose "Won't you let me take
you on a sea" Cruz was pretty good.

"d wells" <> "Well, you gotta follow that dream wherever that dream may lead
> You gotta follow that dream to find the love you need" Nobody says it
better than The King.>>

You sir, are a poet, a scholar, and a gentleman.

Rob probably wouldn't be able to appreciate it, but he could get no better
pole than that pole he could get from you. I bet your poop literally smells
like roses and tastes like baked apples.

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:55:57 -0400, "Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>"d wells" <> "Well, you gotta follow that dream wherever that dream may lead
>> You gotta follow that dream to find the love you need" Nobody says it
>better than The King.>>
>
>You sir, are a poet, a scholar, and a gentleman.
>
>Rob probably wouldn't be able to appreciate it, but he could get no better
>pole than that pole he could get from you. I bet your poop literally smells
>like roses and tastes like baked apples.
>

Sam ... Sam ... Sam,

Just about every post you make that could be considered an attempt at
a witty comeback contains some sort of homosexual reference.

Ya gotta mix it up man, otherwise you're going to get pigeon holed.
(There, I've left 'pigeon holed' for you. Avoid the temptation to go
for the obvious. Reach out. Spread your comedy wings. Oh ... there's
'spread' too; this is going to be a hard post for you to deal with.
Ah! and 'hard ...' Goddamn! Will the temptation never end!?)

Anyway, back to pigeons and holing.

If you keep singing the same song you're going to end up in a rut.
Dammit! Now there's 'rut.' Are there no words in the English language
that don't lend themselves to (homo)sexual overtones? (Pete, you've
got a genuine outsider's view of American language/slang, do you have
any suggestions?)

Let's shift to something for our British and Australian friends:

* * *
Sam,

You are obviously full of spunk. No doubt obtained during all the time
you've spent in the gym rooting around with the guys looking for
spring collars.

* * *

There. Now, I honestly think Dave, Charles (and Pete) are too smart to
be following this thread (and the Canadians too polite ... and smart
.... polite and smart. Polite, smart, and with an intelligence
community that scares the shit out of even the Mossad). But, if they,
Dave and Charles, are reading I'd ask that they weigh in on the above
paragraph and my thoughts in the paragraph below.

My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat weak,
but, unless I've missed my mark there are two subtle homosexual
references in that paragraph. One that a less-refined Brit might make
and one a less-Steve-Iriwinesque Aussie might make. But you have to
look for them. You have to think a bit. They're not in your face.

Compare that to something you might post. Let's grab a line from the
above paragraph:

I said:

"My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
weak, but, unless I've missed my mark there are two subtle homosexual
references in that paragraph."


Whereas you might say:

"My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
weak, like your sphincter ... "

No, I stand corrected. That would be too subtle. You would be more
likely to say:

"My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
weak, like your sphincter due to all the ramming it takes, ..."


Or to use another sentence, I just typed:

"You have to think a bit. They're not in your face"

You would likely type:

"You have to think a bit. They're not in your face, like Rob's balls
are ..."

I'm sure stuff like that is very funny to you and Straight Arrow as
you are passing notes back and forth in study hall, but this is
Usenet. You've got a world-wide audience. Many of the readers are not
Americans; they expect more.

Take a chance. Try some observational humor. And not stuff like, "Have
you ever noticed when Rob's bent over a weight bench ..." I mean,
really reach. Leave Rob and weights out of it. Try some political
humor, some gun humor.

Dig some 70's-era Steve Martin albums out and become MFW's Wild and
Crazy Guy.

I'm guessing, based on a lot of your posts and what psychologist say
about things like that, that you have honest-to-God Happy Feet. (Not
that there's anything wrong with that.)

See what I've done there. I've made a reference to an album that is
30-years old. A lot of people may not get the reference (and those
that do may not even see a joke there) ... but I took a chance. I
reached for the stars.

Go for it man.

"d wells" <> Sam ... Sam ... Sam, <snip mountainous meanderings>

Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse meeeeeeee....

d wells wrote:
> "Sam Slone" wrote:
> ><dhamilton@> And it is important to you that he swallows because
> >when you imagine him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting
> >ruins the fantasy for you?>>
>
> >You're a regular Sherlock Homo.
>
> I think you mean "You're a regular Jack-me-off Mason." That would be
> a play on Jackie Mason, a comic, and the comment you reference leans
> more toward being funny than it does toward being anything that would
> have suggested deductive reasoning had been used to arrive at a
> conclusion.
>
> (Curt had provided that.)

Hey, I try.

> I think "Jerk-me Seinfeld" would have worked as well.

heh )

> How about "Mitch Give-me-Hedburg?"

"All right!"

> "John Bel-oh-me" (for Belushi ... I don't know that I really like it)

If you'll allow me, "John Be-LOW-ME!" might work a little better?

> A Michael Richards reference seems to be more appropriate, but I can't
> think of a way to make it work. (And I'm not weighing in with an
> opinion of MR here, I'm just saying that based on recent press it
> would be fitting.)

How about "Michael DID-I-SAY-THAT? Richards"? No.

I got nuthin'.

> "Larry Bend-Over-The-Table Guy"

(groan)

> "Joey's Bishop" (One of the Brits at work used to make a comment about
> 'buffing the Bishop' or something like that. "You're a regular Joey's
> Bishop" then would suggest "You're a regular dick." It does lack any

There must be a bajillion terms for masturbation. Probably because
it's such an unpopular activity?

What's that joke? "Ninety-nine percent of the population admits to
masturbating... and one percent lies."

> form of homosexual reference but I think it makes up for that by its
> international appeal (please see "Brits" above) and it harkens back to
> a time (late 50's early 60's ... whenever it was the Rat Packers were
> running around) when America was a kinder, gentler, place and gas was
> damn-near free and flowing right out of the ground.

As I've scribbled a few times already, I'm reading a Lee Child book
'Echo Burning' and in that novel there's mention of V-8 engines
mounted by the sides of the road that were used as water pumps to
irrigate Texas fields back in the day. They appear in the novel as
rusted hulks that offer testimony to what you describe.

> >But now that you mention it, I do often look
> >at his webpage to see his girlish waist and steroid-induced bitch-tits, and

Joey Bishop has gyno? Naaaaaah!

(Googles)

http://www.porthalcyon.com/features/...atpack02.shtml

Cool.

And, I ask you, is Sammy Davis the coolest cat ever? Check him
chalking his cue stick.

> >I imagine grasping him firmly by the hips and bending him over a barbell on
> >a bench press and thrusting into him mercilessly as his thin tapered waist
> >squirms in my grasp and then pulling out just before cumming and letting him
> >drop to his knees and gobble the shit-covered knob until the chocolatey goo
> >shot deep into his throat and he would grin with the shit-sluice dribbling
> >out of his mouth and say, "That was as good as _________(insert name of
> >famous bodybuilder here)!" and I would pull my shorts back up and look
> >around the gym, embarassed at the looks of the straight chicks and surprised
> >to see the bold lust in the faces of the many fruity guys at the gym.

Uh, "shit-sluice"? Sam, what cable channels are YOU watching?

> "Well, you gotta follow that dream wherever that dream may lead
> You gotta follow that dream to find the love you need"
>
> Nobody says it better than The King.

Peggy Lipton has a cool biography ( http://www.amazon.com/Breathing-Out-.../dp/0312324138
aka http://tinyurl.com/37fjeg ) that offers some great (okay, odd)
Elvis anecdotes. Uh, by way of trivia is all. Never mind.

--
Curt

Zen Cohen wrote:
> "d wells" wrote
[...]

> > I think you mean "You're a regular Jack-me-off Mason." That would be
[...]

> > I think "Jerk-me Seinfeld" would have worked as well.
>
> > How about "Mitch Give-me-Hedburg?"
>
> ....
>
> In a similar connection, my favorite nickname that Dan Patrick gave a
> baseball player was Bert "Be Home" Byleven. And Jose "Won't you let me take
> you on a sea" Cruz was pretty good.

There has GOT to be a Dan Patrick website that collects those gems.

(Googles)

Hmmm. Not popping out immediately as I woulda expected.

Did find "Live free or Ty Harden".

D'OH! I was actually thinking of Chris Berman.

http://www.funny2.com/berman.htm

--
Curt

d wells wrote:
[...]

> Sam ... Sam ... Sam,

Use caution, Cohen might try to pat you on the head. (And, no, that is
not a homosexual reference.)

> Just about every post you make that could be considered an attempt at
> a witty comeback contains some sort of homosexual reference.
>
> Ya gotta mix it up man, otherwise you're going to get pigeon holed.
> (There, I've left 'pigeon holed' for you. Avoid the temptation to go
> for the obvious. Reach out. Spread your comedy wings. Oh ... there's
> 'spread' too; this is going to be a hard post for you to deal with.
> Ah! and 'hard ...' Goddamn! Will the temptation never end!?)

That's not fair. He's got a gun, but you stole all his ammo!

> Anyway, back to pigeons and holing.
>
> If you keep singing the same song you're going to end up in a rut.
> Dammit! Now there's 'rut.' Are there no words in the English language
> that don't lend themselves to (homo)sexual overtones? (Pete, you've
> got a genuine outsider's view of American language/slang, do you have
> any suggestions?)
>
> Let's shift to something for our British and Australian friends:
>
> * * *
> Sam,
>
> You are obviously full of spunk. No doubt obtained during all the time
> you've spent in the gym rooting around with the guys looking for
> spring collars.
>
> * * *
>
> There. Now, I honestly think Dave, Charles (and Pete) are too smart to
> be following this thread (and the Canadians too polite ... and smart
> ... polite and smart. Polite, smart, and with an intelligence
> community that scares the shit out of even the Mossad). But, if they,
> Dave and Charles, are reading I'd ask that they weigh in on the above
> paragraph and my thoughts in the paragraph below.
>
> My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat weak,
> but, unless I've missed my mark there are two subtle homosexual
> references in that paragraph. One that a less-refined Brit might make
> and one a less-Steve-Iriwinesque Aussie might make. But you have to
> look for them. You have to think a bit. They're not in your face.
>
> Compare that to something you might post. Let's grab a line from the
> above paragraph:
>
> I said:
>
> "My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
> weak, but, unless I've missed my mark there are two subtle homosexual
> references in that paragraph."
>
> Whereas you might say:
>
> "My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
> weak, like your sphincter ... "
>
> No, I stand corrected. That would be too subtle. You would be more
> likely to say:
>
> "My command of British English and Australian Outback is somewhat
> weak, like your sphincter due to all the ramming it takes, ..."
>
> Or to use another sentence, I just typed:
>
> "You have to think a bit. They're not in your face"
>
> You would likely type:
>
> "You have to think a bit. They're not in your face, like Rob's balls
> are ..."
>
> I'm sure stuff like that is very funny to you and Straight Arrow as
> you are passing notes back and forth in study hall, but this is
> Usenet. You've got a world-wide audience. Many of the readers are not
> Americans; they expect more.
>
> Take a chance. Try some observational humor. And not stuff like, "Have
> you ever noticed when Rob's bent over a weight bench ..." I mean,
> really reach. Leave Rob and weights out of it. Try some political
> humor, some gun humor.
>
> Dig some 70's-era Steve Martin albums out and become MFW's Wild and
> Crazy Guy.
>
> I'm guessing, based on a lot of your posts and what psychologist say
> about things like that, that you have honest-to-God Happy Feet. (Not
> that there's anything wrong with that.)
>
> See what I've done there. I've made a reference to an album that is
> 30-years old. A lot of people may not get the reference (and those
> that do may not even see a joke there) ... but I took a chance. I
> reached for the stars.
>
> Go for it man.

David likes the punch line, but I'm digging the book.

Nomination to come (don't say it!)

--
Curt

"Curt" <> Peggy Lipton has a cool biography that offers some great (okay,
odd)
> Elvis anecdotes. Uh, by way of trivia is all. Never mind.
>
Peggy Lipton is so old she used to fukk on horseback (that was the back seat
back when Abe Linkin was getting trim).

"Curt" <> D'OH! I was actually thinking of Chris Berman.
http://www.AnnoyingAsshole.com
>

Berman is so funny that terminally ill kids routinely ask him to host their
funerals.

Sam Slone wrote:
> "Curt" <> Peggy Lipton has a cool biography that offers some great (okay,
> odd)> Elvis anecdotes. Uh, by way of trivia is all. Never mind.
>
> Peggy Lipton is so old she used to fukk on horseback (that was the back seat
> back when Abe Linkin was getting trim).

(Googles)

Wow. She was born in 1946. She'll be 61 in August. I just pictured her
being younger for some reason. I think she's stuck at her 'Mod Squad
age' for me, for all time.

And, hey, even at 60, Abe should be so lucky.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ddLincoln.jpeg
aka http://tinyurl.com/344e6b

versus

http://blog.wired.com/biotech/images/peggy_lipton_2.jpg aka
http://tinyurl.com/2q9wu7

You decide.

--
Curt

Sam Slone wrote:
> "d wells" <> Sam ... Sam ... Sam, <snip mountainous meanderings>
>
> Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse meeeeeeee....

Nice.

Coulda been a snit, but he plays along! There is hope for this world.

--

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:34:56 -0400, "Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>"d wells" <> Sam ... Sam ... Sam, <snip mountainous meanderings>
>
>Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse meeeeeeee....
>
<G>

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:41:45 -0700, Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

>d wells wrote:
>> "Sam Slone" wrote:
>> ><dhamilton@> And it is important to you that he swallows because
>> >when you imagine him giving you oral sex the thought of him spitting
>> >ruins the fantasy for you?>>
>>
>> >You're a regular Sherlock Homo.
>>
>> I think you mean "You're a regular Jack-me-off Mason." That would be
>> a play on Jackie Mason, a comic, and the comment you reference leans
>> more toward being funny than it does toward being anything that would
>> have suggested deductive reasoning had been used to arrive at a
>> conclusion.
>>
>> (Curt had provided that.)
>
>Hey, I try.
>
>> I think "Jerk-me Seinfeld" would have worked as well.
>
>heh )
>
>> How about "Mitch Give-me-Hedburg?"
>
>"All right!"
>
>> "John Bel-oh-me" (for Belushi ... I don't know that I really like it)
>
Very good ... you get the points for this one.


>If you'll allow me, "John Be-LOW-ME!" might work a little better?
>
>> A Michael Richards reference seems to be more appropriate, but I can't
>> think of a way to make it work. (And I'm not weighing in with an
>> opinion of MR here, I'm just saying that based on recent press it
>> would be fitting.)
>
>How about "Michael DID-I-SAY-THAT? Richards"? No.
>
>I got nuthin'.
>
>> "Larry Bend-Over-The-Table Guy"
>
>(groan)
>
>> "Joey's Bishop" (One of the Brits at work used to make a comment about
>> 'buffing the Bishop' or something like that. "You're a regular Joey's
>> Bishop" then would suggest "You're a regular dick." It does lack any
>
>There must be a bajillion terms for masturbation. Probably because
>it's such an unpopular activity?
>
>What's that joke? "Ninety-nine percent of the population admits to
>masturbating... and one percent lies."
>
Men's Health, not too long ago, published something that said the
average men man masturbates once a day.

We all strive to be above average. This might be our best chance.


>> form of homosexual reference but I think it makes up for that by its
>> international appeal (please see "Brits" above) and it harkens back to
>> a time (late 50's early 60's ... whenever it was the Rat Packers were
>> running around) when America was a kinder, gentler, place and gas was
>> damn-near free and flowing right out of the ground.
>
>As I've scribbled a few times already, I'm reading a Lee Child book
>'Echo Burning' and in that novel there's mention of V-8 engines
>mounted by the sides of the road that were used as water pumps to
>irrigate Texas fields back in the day. They appear in the novel as
>rusted hulks that offer testimony to what you describe.
>
>> >But now that you mention it, I do often look
>> >at his webpage to see his girlish waist and steroid-induced bitch-tits, and
>
>Joey Bishop has gyno? Naaaaaah!
>
>(Googles)
>
>http://www.porthalcyon.com/features/...atpack02.shtml
>
>Cool.
>
>And, I ask you, is Sammy Davis the coolest cat ever? Check him
>chalking his cue stick.
>
>> >I imagine grasping him firmly by the hips and bending him over a barbell on
>> >a bench press and thrusting into him mercilessly as his thin tapered waist
>> >squirms in my grasp and then pulling out just before cumming and letting him
>> >drop to his knees and gobble the shit-covered knob until the chocolatey goo
>> >shot deep into his throat and he would grin with the shit-sluice dribbling
>> >out of his mouth and say, "That was as good as _________(insert name of
>> >famous bodybuilder here)!" and I would pull my shorts back up and look
>> >around the gym, embarassed at the looks of the straight chicks and surprised
>> >to see the bold lust in the faces of the many fruity guys at the gym.
>
>Uh, "shit-sluice"? Sam, what cable channels are YOU watching?
>
>> "Well, you gotta follow that dream wherever that dream may lead
>> You gotta follow that dream to find the love you need"
>>
>> Nobody says it better than The King.
>
>Peggy Lipton has a cool biography ( http://www.amazon.com/Breathing-Out-.../dp/0312324138
>aka http://tinyurl.com/37fjeg ) that offers some great (okay, odd)
>Elvis anecdotes. Uh, by way of trivia is all. Never mind.

Have you seen Mystery Woman on one of the cable channels? Hallmark?
Oxygen? Something Cablish. Link (Clarence Williams III, as I know you
know) plays a role as one of the coworkers. He might be an ex-spy or
something as well.

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:01:22 -0000, Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

>Sam Slone wrote:
>> "Curt" <> Peggy Lipton has a cool biography that offers some great (okay,
>> odd)> Elvis anecdotes. Uh, by way of trivia is all. Never mind.
>>
>> Peggy Lipton is so old she used to fukk on horseback (that was the back seat
>> back when Abe Linkin was getting trim).
>
>(Googles)
>
>Wow. She was born in 1946. She'll be 61 in August. I just pictured her
>being younger for some reason. I think she's stuck at her 'Mod Squad
>age' for me, for all time.
>
Running down alleys with cool music playing will keep you young.


>And, hey, even at 60, Abe should be so lucky.
>
>http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ddLincoln.jpeg
>aka http://tinyurl.com/344e6b
>
>versus
>
>http://blog.wired.com/biotech/images/peggy_lipton_2.jpg aka
>http://tinyurl.com/2q9wu7
>
>You decide.

d wells wrote:
[...]

> Have you seen Mystery Woman on one of the cable channels? Hallmark?
> Oxygen? Something Cablish. Link (Clarence Williams III, as I know you
> know) plays a role as one of the coworkers. He might be an ex-spy or
> something as well.

I wonder if that'll be on DVD someday. /

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0929934/

Reviewing that list, the last film I *remember* seeing with Williams
was 'Deep Cover' (1992) with Laurence Fishburne and Jeff Goldblum.
I've seen 'Reindeer Games' (2000) however don't recall Williams' role.
Don't have TV and haven't seen any of his work since Mod Squad,
unfortunately. Glad he's still working. A lot, apparently.

Holy crap. I also forgot about 'The General's Daughter' (1999).
Manoman, my memory is beat. One thing I do remember, though, is that
Williams and I share the same birthdate (minus the year). He was born
in August 21, 1939 while I came along more than three decades later.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Williams_III

I'm almost certain (yeah, the memory thing applies, but still) that I
learned his birthdate as an elementary school kid and from a library
book about the Mod Squad show. Just thought it was cool, "Hey, this TV
star and I share the same birthday!"

That show was the bomb.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mod_Squad

(The 1999 movie remake was ass, however. And not in a Vida Guerra way,
either.)

--
Curt

d wells wrote:
> Curt wrote:

re Peggy Lipton of The Mod Squad

> > I think she's stuck at her 'Mod Squad age' for me, for all time.
>
> Running down alleys with cool music playing will keep you young.

No doubt. )

Anyone care to offer their favorite shows from back in the day?

No chronological order necessarily, some in reruns, and certainly not
all-inclusive, but, for me...

The Mod Squad
Julia
The Courtship of Eddie's Father
I Spy
Starsky & Hutch
Dark Shadows
Room 222
Nanny and the Professor
The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
The Adventures of Superman (in reruns)
Batman
The Incredible Hulk
Love American Style
Truth or Consequences (Bob Barker before 'The Price is Right')
The Brady Bunch
Bonanza
Gunsmoke
McCloud
Flipper
Gentle Ben
The Red Skelton Show
The Jack Benny Show

God, the list goes on and on. Check for yourself:

http://www.fiftiesweb.com/tv-ratings-50s.htm
http://www.fiftiesweb.com/tv-ratings-60s.htm
http://www.fiftiesweb.com/tv-ratings-70s.htm

--
Curt

"Curt" <> The Mod Squad
> Julia
> The Courtship of Eddie's Father
> Starsky & Hutch
> Room 222
> Nanny and the Professor
> The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
> The Adventures of Superman (in reruns)
> Batman
> The Incredible Hulk
> The Brady Bunch
> Bonanza
> Gunsmoke
> McCloud
> Gentle Ben
> The Red Skelton Show

The above would be my favorites, add in Family Affair, Green Hornet (often
typed as Green HornEY), Star Trek, Land of the Giants, Lost in Space, The
Rookies, The F.B.I., and of course Hawaii 5-0's BOOK'EM DANO!

In article <50Cgi.2619$09.897@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
"Sam Slone" <samslone@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Curt" <> The Mod Squad
> > Julia
> > The Courtship of Eddie's Father
> > Starsky & Hutch
> > Room 222
> > Nanny and the Professor
> > The Ghost and Mrs. Muir
> > The Adventures of Superman (in reruns)
> > Batman
> > The Incredible Hulk
> > The Brady Bunch
> > Bonanza
> > Gunsmoke
> > McCloud
> > Gentle Ben
> > The Red Skelton Show
>
> The above would be my favorites, add in Family Affair, Green Hornet (often
> typed as Green HornEY), Star Trek, Land of the Giants, Lost in Space, The
> Rookies, The F.B.I., and of course Hawaii 5-0's BOOK'EM DANO!

If we are talking about early TV shows, Star Trek, Lost in Space, Laugh
In, Red Skelton, Johnny Carson.

Later on, add Babylon 5, Deep Space 9 and Stargate.

I quit watching regular television about 5 years ago so I have NO idea
what is on television now...
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson