In article <f1q5k2dgqsindbkfbqk37330uu4hqgarpe@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> DZ <26540@832425689.17299873.7362.26262.9238> wrote:
> >Dally <Dally@myself.com> wrote:
> >> DZ wrote:
> >>> OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> DZ wrote:
> >>>>>OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>No arguments there... but there is still the whole respect issue. I
> >>>>>>think tho' that more gay males are willing to swallow. I guess if
> >>>>>>you want someone to swallow your spooge, go find a gay partner. A
> >>>>>>cute quote I once saw: "Being bisexual doubles your chances for a
> >>>>>>date on Saturday night."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I know a gay scientist who (being a scientist and all) claims that he
> >>>>>has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the taste is very
> >>>>>individual-specific, even after adjusting for variation in the
> >>>>>diet. So he says that some individuals are easy to swallow, while
> >>>>>others are near to impossible.
> >>>>
> >>>>I've read that diet can make all the difference.....
> >>>>More fresh fruit is supposed to help iirc.
> >>>
> >>> Are you a gay scientist with the profound field experience? I didn't
> >>> think so! :-) I trust the scientist. His research correctly adjusted
> >>> for the diet.
> >>
> >> I bet he had a very high compliance rate among the subjects being
> >> tasted, er, tested.
> >
> >It was mostly an epidemiological, rather than interventional
> >study. You just need a very big sample, and lots of repeated
> >observations.
>
> Could the cohort be considered a limitation?
Ahem..... ;-)
I wondered about negative controls......
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
Re: YOU are my BITCH, i control YOU! 
Linear Mode
